I went to the Microsoft store last Sunday to play with Surface and see the other touch ultrabooks and the VivoTab. The store was packed, which I was happy to see.
While waiting for line of people to dissipate so I could actually play with a Surface device, I played with a Sony touchscreen ultrabook, which I thought was very nice, and the VivoTab, which I thought was outstanding. Super light and a nice keyboard dock.
My favorite part of Windows RT is that I was able to pull up Hulu.com and nbc.com/snl and play any video / show I wanted without the website telling me that "this video is not available for your device."
I'm still waiting on Surface Pro and right now am looking at that versus the Samsung Ativ Smart PC Pro, but I could probably coexist pretty nicely with Windows RT as my laptop and android tablet replacements.
Rights agreements.This actually pisses me off that Hulu doesn't let you watch on your mobile device. What's the difference other than the device?
I'm not a Hulu user...Never tried it, never used it.This actually pisses me off that Hulu doesn't let you watch on your mobile device. What's the difference other than the device? I suppose they want to charge because being able to watch on your mobile device is supposedly a luxury. But from a technological standpoint who cares? Maybe someone should make a desktop browser spoofer on an Android phone....
This actually pisses me off that Hulu doesn't let you watch on your mobile device. What's the difference other than the device? I suppose they want to charge because being able to watch on your mobile device is supposedly a luxury. But from a technological standpoint who cares? Maybe someone should make a desktop browser spoofer on an Android phone....
I'm not a Hulu user...Never tried it, never used it.
But can't someone just request the Hulu.com desktop site to bypass that? Many Android browsers have that feature nowadays?
we should start a countdown...
For somebody who hates Microsoft with a passion, you sure as hell manage to post multiple times in every single Windows 8/Surface/WP8 thread you can find.
Yes, but what's stopping someone from using Chrome or Dolphin browser on Android and requesting the desktop site of Hulu.com?You can on Windows RT. It's just a regular web browser to Hulu.
Yes, but what's stopping someone from using Chrome or Dolphin browser on Android and requesting the desktop site of Hulu.com?
By requesting the desktop site, you're spoofing the user agent. Hulu shouldn't be able to stop that.
Hulu can tell from the mobile Flash. You could patch Flash to make it work but I don't know if there's current working one. I'm stopped fooling around with it since I rarely watch Hulu.
I expect Hulu to block Windows 8 RT soon. HP Touchpad worked with Hulu in the beginning before Hulu to a stop to it.
But should they? It isn't clear to me that the Surface isn't a PC.
Integrating the touch ui with the desktop makes perfect sense. You can choose to ignore it and use only the classic desktop. The only thing missing is the start button and IMO Ms should have kept that as an option, but you really don't need it and there are 3rd party apparently for that. Right clicking on the bottom left corner gives you a menu with a lot of the options you had in the start menu.
Soon there will be no such thing as a laptop without a touchscreen and it's great to have the choice between a touch interface and a traditional desktop interface.
As a touch ui it's very good. I especially like it's use of swiping from the edge of the screen to alt tab or bring up overlay toolbars. Ms's biggest problem is their reputation. People just don't like them as much as they like Google or apple.
It may be a niche market, but I definitely think there is a market for Windows 8 pro tablets.Windows RT will fail. Windows 8 pro tablets will probably fail, too.
I'm on the Word team in Office and I'm coming into this thread incredibly late, but FWIW the slow typing on ARM was something we couldn't fully address in time for the preview release. Word RTM (ARM and x86/x64) has much better performance.
One of the challenges we had was that for a large majority of the product cycle we didn't even know about the Surface. We were looking at ARM early on, but the hardware we had was prerelease hardware from MSFT partners that had varying levels of performance.
Even now we don't know a whole lot about the Surface. It's a little frustrating, since we (Office) hit RTM we're eagerly awaiting the point at which new Surface RTs will have Office RTM baked into them. The preview release is seriously many many months old from the RTM release, and it's painful to think that this is what customers are going to see from Office when they turn on their shiny new device.
This issue is known, intermittent and dependent on a number of factors. It has been addressed and an update is forthcoming.
This type of issue would be identical across NVIDIA based ARM PCs and large numbers of the reference platforms were available at the same time they have been available to external developers.
Developers on the Office team (and Word team) that needed to contribute to the ARM focused work had access to the tools and hardware needed, including Surface specific hardware. There was no shortage of knowledge, hardware, or communication.
With regard to WinRT Office:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4708274
And a response from..
Are these real MS folks? And this dude (stevesi) is the one who recently resigned?