Grey_Beard
Golden Member
- Sep 23, 2014
- 1,825
- 2,007
- 136
U mad?
No, just feel your not receptive to, as you say FACTS. If you cannot handle the temps, get out of the kitchen.
U mad?
Sure. Thanks for that. I agree that the response wasn't good in the US. But I think there was a shortage of masks. Which is why Fauci told us NOT to get masks or wear them.
I really do not know what the FED could have done here. Our States are regulated locally as well, so they can DENY Fed help too.
I really don't know how to address that, but its a fair point.
I am saying that that expected response of the FEDS were unrealistic. Cuomo for example, seemed to want relief almost the second he asked for it.
I am opposed to NARRATIVES but will accept proven FACTS.
It was more than Cuomo. He was the most vocal, but he was spot on with what was happening. Nothing to do with immediate relief, we all want a process, but there was only chaos. Imagine that.
I don't think this is true.
Trump downplayed it for sure. But I cannot recall a governor not getting what the needed (PPE, ventilators, etc).
If you can find me one who didn't get what they needed from the FED, I'll listen.
Prove it
Yes, the guy who presided over one of the worst death rates in the world blaming Trump. Go figure.
I've read your comments. You say things, you don't ask questions that seek data.
You don't present any.
You don't care.
Larry Hogan (MD) had to get his shit (early test kits) from Korea, then re-routed to BWI where he had jurisdiction (away from Dulles), at the last minute, because Trump fucking stole NJ's shit the week before.
That is a fact.
Why don't you accept facts over feels?
Circular.Where's your evidence?
Do you understand what was going on? Clearly not. The steps he took have them way under other States. Yes,he made a bad decision with the nursing homes, but the administrators had the responsibility that if they did not have the beds or did not have the ability to quarantine, they could have said no. He was not responsible for the VA fiasco either, that was their mismanagement.
Circular.
Your posts are all the evidence required, based on the simple laziness of your asking nothing.
History.Link?
Nope.Translation: I have no evidence.
No, the CDC specifically said there was no benefit for asymptomatic people to wear masks. This was very early in the epidemic, and they changed this recommendation after more information became available on asymptomatic and aerosol transmission. I remember this specifically because, intuitively it made no sense to me at the time. Not wearing masks to save them for frontline workers was mainly in regard to N95 respirators.Wrong. At the beginning fauci wanted the ppe for front line workers and he admitted they did not understand the virus enough to warrant masks and etc to be used by everyone
So basically you've ignored everything that has happened in the country since January, then come shit posting here, refusing to believe recent history and demanding links to widespread knowledge.Link?
History.
Life. This shit is easy, and that, in particular, has been posted in AT dozens of times in teh last months.
I'm not about to go do that shit for the dozenth lazy asshole that shows up from some long hiatus, pretending that he hasn't lived in the world that the rest of us have, blissfully uninformed, all the while demanding to be informed, when he has made clear that he gives no shits about such, by the simple fact that it takes him 2 seconds to ask a simple question that has been answered for months.
That’s an interesting narrative you are creating.I am saying that that expected response of the FEDS were unrealistic. Cuomo for example, seemed to want relief almost the second he asked for it.