No one. I can admit that. But there was a claim that masks protects others. So naturally, it can be assumed that those who died were around people who didn't wear masks.
It's hard to engage with you because your arguments are so conrfused and incoherent. How is it 'natural' to assume that, based on the claim made?
Masks protect those around you. It's not an absolute, it's a probabilistic thing. The most one can say is it can be assumed that those who died were a bit more likely to have had non-mask wearers around them. That seems to be what we see when comparing countries and cultures where mask-wearing is a norm with those where there is resistance to the practice.
In any case that's not even what you just said - you said
We have over 200k COVID deaths. OK. To assume they all didn't wear masks is extremely naïve
Which doesn't even relate to your subsequent posts. Who assumed all the dead 'didn't wear masks'? That seems to be going back to the idea that masks protect the wearer, which was never the point under discussion.
(And, as an aside, how is 'naive' even the right word even on your own terms? You might say such an assumption is 'unwarrrented' or 'questionable', but how is it 'naive'?)
Your arguments are so incoherent that it's hard to work out what you are trying to say, other than 'liberals bad, Trump good'.
I don't _like_ wearing a mask, myself - it makes my glasses steam up, for one thing. But it's just basic consideration for others, it seems to me, especially in indoor shared spaces like shops.