Originally posted by: berserker
Still refusing to deny he used coke. :roll:
You people really elected yourselves a winner. An alcoholic, pothead, cokehead. A multi-drug abuser.
Is there nothing this doper can do that you people won't defend?
Apparently, there is NO educating you. But just for a reference take a trip to Texas and talk to any of the thousands of prisoners who are doing years of hard time for having ONE JOINT in their possession, then tell me again about your lack of education and your putrid refusal to hold King Georgie to the same, or for that matter, ANY standard.Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: berserker
Still refusing to deny he used coke. :roll:
You people really elected yourselves a winner. An alcoholic, pothead, cokehead. A multi-drug abuser.
Is there nothing this doper can do that you people won't defend?
I missed the part where he or anyone else stated that he abused pot and cocaine. Please educate me.
Originally posted by: BBond
Judging from the past four years the drugged out alchie freak is ruling by flashback. But he probably thinks they're divine visions.
:roll:
::snicker::Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
You've got a serious problem little man. Seek help.Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Ah, such absolute cluelessness from BBond. I see you believe Bush is my own druggie, when I've stated for a fact I don't care for him and didn't vote for him.Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Like ex-cigarette smokers, former-drug users can often become the most vehemently anti-drug.
And if the Republicans DID re-elect a "druggie," maybe they were just trying to keep up with the Jonesers.
Erm, I meant the Democrats.
:laugh:
"IF" they elected a druggie? :laugh:
You're so delusional you won't accept a confession right from the druggies mouth.
What a bunch of hypocrites. Just IMAGINE what you'd be saying if a Democratic president admitted ON TAPE that he abused alcohol, pot, and COCAINE.
Yet when it's your own druggie you defend him. You people are pathetic.
I hope they call you for a PIPA study real soon. :laugh:
Your ridiculous non-partisan charade is clearly exposed in each of your posts.
You're as transparent as your president.
Seriously.
I'm a big man.
Seriously.
You're Saran Wrap. See a see through neoCON.
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: BBond
Judging from the past four years the drugged out alchie freak is ruling by flashback. But he probably thinks they're divine visions.
:roll:
And this kind of judgement by the public is why people don't come out and advertise that they have abuse problems. If we only elected people to office who never "got high" or drunk in their lifetimes, we'd have a very slim pool of candidates. Maybe people who judge Bush should remember that every time you point your finger at somebody else, there are 3 fingers pointing back at you. If a person uses alcohol or drugs with the express intent of becoming innebriated or "high" then that person just abused a drug. There are far more people out there who do this kind of thing on a regular basis yet don't think of themselves as "addicts" or "abusers" than we'd care to think of. And few of them ever have the wisdom or insight to see the problem for what it really is let alone the wherewithall to look at themselves in the mirror and recognize their flaws and do something about it. Now. . .I am not standing up for Bush, I think he is a terrible president. But the fact that he did choose to recognize when he was out of line with his substance abuse and chose to change his ways says that maybe there is still hope for him. Nobody is perfect but when we are able to see when we are wrong and change ourselves for the better, it brings us a little closer to perfection. He turned his life around and like it or not, he's the President of the USA now. You have to at least admire that a little.
Originally posted by: berserker
BBond, just because you say he is those things doesn't make it so. Don't you realize that?
Originally posted by: Phokus
Let me be the first to put down $1000 and bet the moral outrage of the religious right will fail to materialize.
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
A druggy? Jesus, the man smoked pot. Hell he possible snorted a line or two. So what? I'm no Bush fan, but this is ridiculous (other than him having a hypocritical stance on drug use which is not cool imo). Smoking pot does not make you a druggy. I have plenty of friends who have completely fvcked up there lives over drugs, I know all too well what it can do, but I'm sorry smoking pot is a complete non issue imo. OMG, I bet ol Bushy boy has drank a beer or two in his life as well! The horror!
:roll:
There's a HUGE difference between pot and coke. Don't you agree?
Originally posted by: judasmachine
so just freakin legalize it already. two presidents in a row admit it, and prolly ten times that many have done it. why not? george and bill apparently don't mind.
Where is it now? Your do as I say but not as I do, broken record routine has aged well beyond senility, dude.Originally posted by: BBond
This nation used to have standards for its highest office. Drug abusers and alcoholics need not apply.
Those standards have been forever rescinded with the arrival of George W. Bush.
Where was all of this forgiveness and understanding from 1992 through 2000, you festering abyssmal hypocrites?
Originally posted by: BBond
This nation used to have standards for its highest office. Drug abusers and alcoholics need not apply.
Those standards have been forever rescinded with the arrival of George W. Bush.
Where was all of this forgiveness and understanding from 1992 through 2000, you festering abyssmal hypocrites?
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
i was refering to the "Oh and if you live in Illinois like you state in your profile G.W.Bush is your President.:laugh: Deal with it! :laugh:" part.Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
REPOSTRepost
Oh and if you live in Illinois like you state in your profile G.W.Bush is your President.:laugh: Deal with it! :laugh:
CsG
what does this have to do with proof that GWB was a druggie?
Besides the fact that it's a REPOST?
CsG
I was commenting on his sig - deal with it. I just think it's hilarious that people like him think Bush isn't their President. whatever feeds the rabid leftist's hate I guess.
Oh, did I mention that this thread is a repost?
CsG
almost every reply you make is a repost - I think you should try using the word "rabid" less. it's like listening to a broken record.
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: BBond
This nation used to have standards for its highest office. Drug abusers and alcoholics need not apply.
Those standards have been forever rescinded with the arrival of George W. Bush.
Where was all of this forgiveness and understanding from 1992 through 2000, you festering abyssmal hypocrites?
But those standards were still in place with Clinton, even though he smoked? You people are making a mountain out of a molehill. The man smoked pot and possibly snorted coke. I'm sorry but that does not make someone a druggie, perhaps a little more human but not a fvcking druggie.
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: BBond
This nation used to have standards for its highest office. Drug abusers and alcoholics need not apply.
Those standards have been forever rescinded with the arrival of George W. Bush.
Where was all of this forgiveness and understanding from 1992 through 2000, you festering abyssmal hypocrites?
But those standards were still in place with Clinton, even though he smoked? You people are making a mountain out of a molehill. The man smoked pot and possibly snorted coke. I'm sorry but that does not make someone a druggie, perhaps a little more human but not a fvcking druggie.
So let me get this straight. Using drugs no longer constitutes a druggie???
How times have changed.
We should really release all the thousands of "a little more human" folks doing hard time in federal pens on minor drug charges then, don't you think?
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: BBond
This nation used to have standards for its highest office. Drug abusers and alcoholics need not apply.
Those standards have been forever rescinded with the arrival of George W. Bush.
Where was all of this forgiveness and understanding from 1992 through 2000, you festering abyssmal hypocrites?
But those standards were still in place with Clinton, even though he smoked? You people are making a mountain out of a molehill. The man smoked pot and possibly snorted coke. I'm sorry but that does not make someone a druggie, perhaps a little more human but not a fvcking druggie.
So let me get this straight. Using drugs no longer constitutes a druggie???
How times have changed.
We should really release all the thousands of "a little more human" folks doing hard time in federal pens on minor drug charges then, don't you think?
Yes I do think. There is no reason for those people to be locked up, at all. And smoking pot and dabbling in coke does not constitute a druggie, so I guess you got it straight. I've been around numerous druggies, I'm assuming you haven't. Just because you've done drugs does not make you a junkie.
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: BBond
This nation used to have standards for its highest office. Drug abusers and alcoholics need not apply.
Those standards have been forever rescinded with the arrival of George W. Bush.
Where was all of this forgiveness and understanding from 1992 through 2000, you festering abyssmal hypocrites?
But those standards were still in place with Clinton, even though he smoked? You people are making a mountain out of a molehill. The man smoked pot and possibly snorted coke. I'm sorry but that does not make someone a druggie, perhaps a little more human but not a fvcking druggie.
So let me get this straight. Using drugs no longer constitutes a druggie???
How times have changed.
We should really release all the thousands of "a little more human" folks doing hard time in federal pens on minor drug charges then, don't you think?
Yes I do think. There is no reason for those people to be locked up, at all. And smoking pot and dabbling in coke does not constitute a druggie, so I guess you got it straight. I've been around numerous druggies, I'm assuming you haven't. Just because you've done drugs does not make you a junkie.