Starbuck1975
Lifer
- Jan 6, 2005
- 14,698
- 1,909
- 126
Then he should have no reservations or hesitation in stating as muchIf Republicans think only having 8 is fine for close to a year, I don't see why having 11 would be the end of the world.
Then he should have no reservations or hesitation in stating as muchIf Republicans think only having 8 is fine for close to a year, I don't see why having 11 would be the end of the world.
The man has spent four decades in politics and 8 years as VP, its a question he should be well equipped to answer with perfect clarityMaybe he doesn’t know, because he isn’t president and talking with advisors whom he’d actually listen to about what to do about that situation.
My perception is just fine, I appreciate the concernMan, you need to lay off the juice... or whatever it is that's got your perception hazy. You didn't pick up on what was really happening. Work on that.
The man has spent four decades in politics and 8 years as VP, its a question he should be well equipped to answer with perfect clarity
Well, that in itself should cement your decision. We want a trustworthy person in the White House, we need that. End of story.
He wasn't perfect, but I think it was a loaded question. He had nothing to gain by answering and I think his not answering to that was wise and canny. He did show a lot of restraint last night. I don't know how much of that was planned, but overall he did great.Then he should have no reservations or hesitation in stating as much
Don't be so sure:My perception is just fine, I appreciate the concern
Your statement paints you a cynic. Not good for you, beware.No lifer politicians are trustworthy..
They tell you what you want to hear and never keeps promises..
And yet here we are with the "successful" "businessman" "outsider" who's going to "shake things up" as President being more dishonest and untrustworthy than any "lifer politician" of my lifetime.No lifer politicians are trustworthy..
They tell you what you want to hear and never keeps promises..
And yet here we are with the "successful" "businessman" "outsider" who's going to "shake things up" as President being more dishonest and untrustworthy than any "lifer politician" of my lifetime.
...But if you can't tell by now - THAT is why Trump was elected to begin with.
They got tired of 20+ years of electing establishment plutocrats and simply said "Eh, fuck it - maybe he change something. God knows voting for the same thing won't"
But... you know... those who don't learn form the past are damned to repeat it... so keep on chugging along with the self-ignorance.
Just put everyone on ignore that disagrees with your opinion.
Then you will live in blissful harmony where everyone loves you and agrees with everything you say. No one will ever dare disagree or give you criticism on your amazing opinions that have zero factual basis.
Good ol' confirmation bias at its finest.
Hey by the way - have you considered joining the bubble?
...But if you can't tell by now - THAT is why Trump was elected to begin with.
They got tired of 20+ years of electing establishment plutocrats and simply said "Eh, fuck it - maybe he change something. God knows voting for the same thing won't"
But... you know... those who don't learn form the past are damned to repeat it... so keep on chugging along with the self-ignorance.
Yet 4 years later, Hillary still isn't locked up.No lifer politicians are trustworthy..
They tell you what you want to hear and never keeps promises..
You expect that a need to slime basis is reason for you to have an answer. It is not. He would have no trouble at all answering but you wouldn't be able to understand a word he said. You already believe you know the only answer he can give, the one that comports with low level thinking. My job is to inform you that you are not up to speed. It's not my job to bring you there. It's the last place you want to go. The truth hides itself from fools by instantly appearing to be unlikely unlikely, not conforming to a fools expectations.Then Biden should have no problem answering where he stands on packing the Supreme Court, which is a legitimate question for him to answer.
I have nobody on ignore. Anything that upsets me does so because it triggers some aspect of my own self hate. Any successful agitators are powerful learning tools. The hard part is trying to get to what it is they really might make me feel. For training in that I used to have access to a padded cell. And nobody can stand to be with me when I drive. The highways are full of people who have no right to be alive and if it weren't for window glass, car noise and distance they would all know it.Just put GotNoMindAtAll on ignore, it'll calm your nerves.
Of course not, I never suggested such a thing.You think who a President is as a person has no effect on how they uphold office?
I have nobody on ignore. Anything that upsets me does so because it triggers some aspect of my own self hate. Any successful agitators are powerful learning tools. The hard part is trying to get to what it is they really might make me feel. For training in that I used to have access to a padded cell. And nobody can stand to be with me when I drive. The highways are full of people who have no right to be alive and if it weren't for window glass, car noise and distance they would all know it.
In the sea there are treasures beyond compare but if you seek safety it is on the shore.
Not really, Democrats have dabbled with the idea since the days of FDR.stacking or expanding the court is a pretty new conversation.
Yeah, like the born with a platinum spoon in his mouth New York real estate billionaire isn't an establishment plutocrat.
Just admit that you fell for Trump's con and move on.
The man has spent four decades in politics and 8 years as VP, its a question he should be well equipped to answer with perfect clarity
Not really, Democrats have dabbled with the idea since the days of FDR.