(The vid uploader) BoostClock: "Just double-checked the differences I reported above: the dull room lighting with the GTX1060 is definitely caused by the orbit of the space station and the sun position. Sorry about the confusion!"Looks like at 1:37 Nvidia is not rendring most of the lighting in the room (table, floor,..). Bug or cheating?
New video from BoostClock confirms that missing lighting is day/night difference
https://youtu.be/r5jmvavX7xI?t=78
(The vid uploader) BoostClock: "Just double-checked the differences I reported above: the dull room lighting with the GTX1060 is definitely caused by the orbit of the space station and the sun position. Sorry about the confusion!"
giantmonkey101: the game uses day and night cycles ........so the lighting can change
That is an interesting read, even on a gtx1080 there is stutter. That the driver specially for the game causes more stutter than the old one is strange. Use the Geforce driver 381.89 WHQL is the advice.
New video from BoostClock confirms that missing lighting is day/night difference
https://youtu.be/r5jmvavX7xI?t=78
And maybe that explains the huge variation int eh benches where the RX 580 clearly beats the GTX 1060 from clearly losing to it.
There difference was caused by a spacecraft orbiting externally occluding the light source, not due to a day/night cycle.Should probably ask the reviewer why all benchmarks weren't run at the same time of day since there is so much less lighting to render/calculate. You have to ask yourself how they didn't notice this while benchmarking or how they failed to consider it might make a difference in the results.
Not sure why this vid is getting all this attention. Its one small youtuber with 386 subscribers doing 1 vs 1 cards. You want something more substantive or 'professional' see the TPU review.Should probably ask the reviewer why all benchmarks weren't run at the same time of day since there is so much less lighting to render/calculate. You have to ask yourself how they didn't notice this while benchmarking or how they failed to consider it might make a difference in the results.
Because this 'small' reviewer replicated the findings of a professional website like PCGH.de regarding stuttering and frame time issues on the NVIDIA 382.05 driver?Not sure why this vid is getting all this attention. Its one small youtuber with 386 subscribers doing 1 vs 1 cards. You want something more substantive or 'professional' see the TPU review.
Because this 'small' reviewer replicated the findings of a professional website like PCGH.de regarding stuttering and frame time issues on the NVIDIA 382.05 driver?
So reverting to 381.89 resolves this. OK. Usually guru3d do performance reviews for big games with FCAT charts. Was wondering why they havent done one for Prey yet. Probably know its driver related and are waiting for new driver. Whatever, since its driver related, looks like a very temporary issue with an immediate work-around for time being. Wow, what a scandal.
Yes big sites are worst.Btw who do you think find out about GTX970 3,5GB?It was people on our little czech forum then we report it to bigger forums and rest story you already know.Not to mention sites like Computerbase / PCGH constantly find IQ issues and report on them while I don't think I've ever seen sites like TPU report on those issues let alone notice them during testing. Feel like they don't even watch their own benchmarks running or play the game but just script it.
Yes big sites are worst.Btw who do you think find out about GTX970 3,5GB?It was people on our little czech forum then we report it to bigger forums and rest story you already know.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...gtx-970-update-pcper-nvidia-response.2416150/
Yeah its funny read it now Point is big sites usually run 30s benchmark and dont care about anything.Some youtubers or sites like pcgameshardware have much better in depth reviews.Thats why they found stuttering.Yikes, that thread. So much denial in the face of data
Yeah, a thread closed by mod for beating dead horse. An issue that, again, resolved by driver updates and no repeat of the memory problem beyond what would affect the GPU power of similar tier/vram cards. You would think the 970 never would have went on to be NVs biggest seller well after the initial reports had the issue continued afterwards. Nevertheless, interesting that what again appears to be a temporary minor driver issue (with easy workaround) is blown out of proportion.Yikes, that thread. So much denial in the face of data
Yikes, that thread. So much denial in the face of data
Nowhere in the article does it say that the frame time spikes are due to game mode.There is no issue with the new drivers, its an issue with game mode on windows with the new creators update. If they disable the stupid feature, it won't cause stutters.
Its a problem in several games. Its useless regardless as the gains are like 1-2fps, literally worthless.
Its a lot more effective to get a light and lean antivirus for example, than use game mode. Also remove needless background applications and you would easily gain 3-4fps no game mode needed.