I think it may be wise to note your non-affiliation with Guru3d (you are certainly not Hilbert H the admin), since they are a reputable site whose views/words often carry weight in GPU related topics. A disclaimer in your sig would be nice.
I think it may be wise to note your non-affiliation with Guru3d (you are certainly not Hilbert H the admin), since they are a reputable site whose views/words often carry weight in GPU related topics. A disclaimer in your sig would be nice.There is no issue with the new drivers, its an issue with game mode on windows with the new creators update. If they disable the stupid feature, it won't cause stutters.
Its a problem in several games. Its useless regardless as the gains are like 1-2fps, literally worthless.
Its a lot more effective to get a light and lean antivirus for example, than use game mode. Also remove needless background applications and you would easily gain 3-4fps no game mode needed.
It seems to run prey just fine, the purpose of this thread. So why did you bring this up cause it has nothing to do with prey?Yes big sites are worst.Btw who do you think find out about GTX970 3,5GB?It was people on our little czech forum then we report it to bigger forums and rest story you already know.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=thread...gtx-970-update-pcper-nvidia-response.2416150/
Yeah its funny read it now
It was in reference to larger sites missing the stuttering from the Nvidia game ready driver for Prey compared to the smaller sites that caught it. Was roughly the same with the 970 and its memory configuration. While larger sites are great for large amounts of data for day one releases, not all the large sites perform in depth analysis of what is actually going on as they should. The majority are driven by page views and the first to release benches get the page views. The relation was not about how the 970 performed in Prey but about methodology and thoroughness in data analysis.It seems to run prey just fine, the purpose of this thread. So why did you bring this up cause it has nothing to do with prey?
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. While I do share the sentiment that those hardly qualify as scandals (970 VRAM marketing being the exception) the context in which the poster brought it up was correct. AS for having nothing to talk about that entirely depends on the type of conversation you wish to have about the hardware. Look at the differences between here and Beyond3d. Same hardware, vastly different conversations. Both have their place.Watching "Archer" on Netflix - Funny.
Re-hashing a company's years old issues that were discussed ad nauseum when they were actually issues - Not funny.
Personally I could live without hearing about the great FCAT, FX5800, Quack, Fury X fan, 970 VRAM, etc "scandals" ever again for the rest of my days.
That's about where the PC gaming market has declined to though, with only two companies in GPUs and CPUs launching parts every couple years we're left talking about stuff that was news years ago.
Would be nice if SOC companies like Samsung and Qualcomm could enter these markets (x86) and give us some choices and things to talk about other than ancient history we don't have much reason to care about. :-|
It seems to run prey just fine, the purpose of this thread.
Not sure why this vid is getting all this attention. Its one small youtuber with 386 subscribers doing 1 vs 1 cards. You want something more substantive or 'professional' see the TPU review.
That kind of logic might work if there were 5 brands of CPUs and GPUs to choose from and some of them had never done anything sketchy.Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. While I do share the sentiment that those hardly qualify as scandals (970 VRAM marketing being the exception) the context in which the poster brought it up was correct. AS for having nothing to talk about that entirely depends on the type of conversation you wish to have about the hardware. Look at the differences between here and Beyond3d. Same hardware, vastly different conversations. Both have their place.
As for the game itself - I am glad to see a game run so fantastically out of the box with little to no issues from the developer side. It's been a while since we've had one of these and it makes it a simple joy to play when we don't have to fiddle with this or that to get things running. To top it off the game is fantastic.
So a company that boasts of getting the fastest support for newly launched games has their driver behaving sub-optimally but it's wrong to point it out?Some people are getting desperate to defend "their" brand. To the point of spending hours scouring the Internet for any piece of information that makes the competition look bad.
I m not sure what the stutter is that people are referring to. Ive played about 2 hours on my 1060 at 1440 and havent noticed any stutter at all.
I am glad I got this game from cdkeys for nearly half price as it isnt my kind of game.
I agree, its a good titleThere is the occasional stutter, few and far between. But is 'minor' stutter compared to some other recent titles. Flawless compared to something like the PC port of RE7.
As far as day and night cycles, the game takes place on a space station...
Might not be the best looking game out there, but damn is it hard to put down. It's been a long time since a game has come along that feels fresh, totally immersive, and meaningful. And is a welcome relief from games/studios who attempt to achieve substance with open-world staples (fetch-quests, meaningless characters, breathless story). I would definitely recommend giving it a try.
Or you could have bought it from Steam at its normal price where the money would actually go to the developer and find you didn't like the game in the 2 hours you get to play it then get a full refund.I am glad I got this game from cdkeys for nearly half price as it isnt my kind of game.
Or you could have bought it from Steam at its normal price where the money would actually go to the developer and find you didn't like the game in the 2 hours you get to play it then get a full refund.
Your rant being OT notwithstanding, I buy a ton from CDKeys. Did the Steam key I got from them not come from the developer, even if it was supposed to be sold in another country? If you're all about paying full price for games, the console forum is <---- that way.
Maybe the driver issue is user-specific. Funny how they talk about "locked 60fps" but all throughout the video the are running with uncapped FPS.Sorry for OT regarding CDKeys, back on topic.
DF seem to have a smoother experience with the 1060 on Prey?
When they refer to locked 60fps, they mean that when you're actually running the game on your system with comparable hardware, and you're capping to 60fps, you'll get 60fps constantly. They uncap it to show it never dips below 60fps therefore it will be locked in actual gameplay.Funny how they talk about "locked 60fps" but all throughout the video the are running with uncapped FPS.
Sorry for OT regarding CDKeys, back on topic.
DF seem to have a smoother experience with the 1060 on Prey?
At no point in the video did I see the RX 580 dipping below 60FPS at 1080p and only once to 54fps at 1440p. It's basically a tie if you want 1440p at 60fps.When they refer to locked 60fps, they mean that when you're actually running the game on your system with comparable hardware, and you're capping to 60fps, you'll get 60fps constantly. They uncap it to show it never dips below 60fps therefore it will be locked in actual gameplay.
Not sure if CDKeys is as bad, but G2A and many others are CD Keys paid for with stolen CC's which are often charged back thus costing the developers money due to fees. So instead of giving them money, you are actually costing them money.
I'm not sure what your point is sorry.At no point in the video did I see the RX 580 dipping below 60FPS at 1080p and only once to 54fps at 1440p. It's basically a tie if you want 1440p at 60fps.
The point is that the GTX 1060 having more 'headroom' to maintain a 60fps lock at 1440p, like they talk about in the video, isn't something you can claim without locking the fps in the first place and measuring the %tage of time spent below 60fps.I'm not sure what your point is sorry.