Originally posted by: VAIN
Link
All I have to say about this is: Gabe Newell is a D|ck.
Possibly ATI too.
Originally posted by: VIAN
Link
All I have to say about this is: Gabe Newell is a D|ck.
Possibly ATI too.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Lying about a game being released and including a voucher to sell people ATi cards and generate revenue to keep Valve's ship afloat, while slandering the competition in the same breath is worse than cheating on a synthetic bench IMO. I've posted before I believe they scammed people for those very purposes, so I'm not at all surprised they lied and cheated the public and their faithful customers. I hope the wheel of Karma kicks 'em right in the nuts.
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Lying about a game being released and including a voucher to sell people ATi cards and generate revenue to keep Valve's ship afloat, while slandering the competition in the same breath is worse than cheating on a synthetic bench IMO. I've posted before I believe they scammed people for those very purposes, so I'm not at all surprised they lied and cheated the public and their faithful customers. I hope the wheel of Karma kicks 'em right in the nuts.
when people bought those cards that included the voucher they knew that there was a wait period of unknown time until they got the game
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Lying about a game being released and including a voucher to sell people ATi cards and generate revenue to keep Valve's ship afloat, while slandering the competition in the same breath is worse than cheating on a synthetic bench IMO. I've posted before I believe they scammed people for those very purposes, so I'm not at all surprised they lied and cheated the public and their faithful customers. I hope the wheel of Karma kicks 'em right in the nuts.
Valve kicked off quite a scandal last Fall when they chose ATI over NVIDIA for sponsorship of their upcoming guaranteed-hit, Half-Life 2. Such choices are made all the time, of course, but this instance was a little different. Valve's honcho programmer, Gabe Newell, publicly shamed NVIDIA and their then-current products at the time, saying that they weren't up to snuff for the new DirectX 9 code in beta (or alpha?) builds of Half-Life 2 (and technically, they weren't). NVIDIA was caught with its pants down for basically cheating at Pixel Shader performance, but the company also said that Valve had failed to ask them about the matter. ATI then enjoyed the perception that buying ATI meant you were guaranteed a better Half Life 2 experience, but then, that was ages ago back when some people expected to see the game even before Halloween. Now the scene is a little different. Was Valve out of line by publicly panning the compatibility of an NVIDIA product with its own game when its own game wasn't even finished? "No," most people thought, because it was almost ready. Right? Wrong. The famous source code leak gunked up the whole works, right? Wrong. At least, not according to a print interview covered by Games Fusion.
But was the leak the main reason behind the game's delay? "No, the fundamental reason was because we underestimated the amount of work left to do and how long it was going to take, especially when the team were so demoralised after the leak." And what's still left to do on the game? "Tuning, tuning and more tuning," comes Gabe's reply.
The situation is made worse by the fact that Valve routinely made it sound as if the game was just inches away from being finished, and then consistently blamed the source code leak for further delays. While one could just chalk that up to product hype, the curious mix of a hardware partner and a public shaming of that partner's competitor leave a bitter taste in some mouths, especially since Newell could have just admitted that the game wasn't going to be ready for quite some time. Currently people expect to see the game this Summer, but it may be well into the Fall when it finally arrives.
Dude, most believed they would be playing HL2 on the card they bought the voucher with. At the very least a playable demo by Sept. of '03 it may be a full year from that date before they see the game. I noticed you are selling a 9800pro, upgrading to a r420 card are we? I fear many who believed they would be playing HL2 on thier 9600XT w/voucher won't have that card by the time the game gets here Worse yet, it'll probably run craptacular on a 9600XT*just a guess* thanks to the tweaking they are doing to the game now.Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Lying about a game being released and including a voucher to sell people ATi cards and generate revenue to keep Valve's ship afloat, while slandering the competition in the same breath is worse than cheating on a synthetic bench IMO. I've posted before I believe they scammed people for those very purposes, so I'm not at all surprised they lied and cheated the public and their faithful customers. I hope the wheel of Karma kicks 'em right in the nuts.
when people bought those cards that included the voucher they knew that there was a wait period of unknown time until they got the game
1.The voucher didn't come with those cards so what's your point agian?Originally posted by: PointlesS
if it doesn't run well on a 9600XT then how will it run on a fx5200 or mx400 which is what the vast majority of people (sadly) have? I doubt you'll be running full details with everything on at a high (1024x768+) resolution...but I would expect the game to run pretty smooth in 1024x768 medium to high details...even the hl2 leak ran relatively decent on a lot of computers...
id Software's long-awaited Doom 3 ($55), which comes out next month
Originally posted by: EarthwormJim
Originally posted by: VIAN
Link
All I have to say about this is: Gabe Newell is a D|ck.
Possibly ATI too.
Thanks for letting us know Captain Obvious.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
...I fear many who believed they would be playing HL2 on thier 9600XT w/voucher won't have that card by the time the game gets here Worse yet, it'll probably run craptacular on a 9600XT*just a guess* thanks to the tweaking they are doing to the game now...
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: PointlesS
if it doesn't run well on a 9600XT then how will it run on a fx5200 or mx400 which is what the vast majority of people (sadly) have? I doubt you'll be running full details with everything on at a high (1024x768+) resolution...but I would expect the game to run pretty smooth in 1024x768 medium to high details...even the hl2 leak ran relatively decent on a lot of computers...
...1.The voucher didn't come with those cards so what's your point agian?...
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Bring on the flames, I'm Johnny Storm:The Human Torch baby! :sun:
So initially the leak was the problem but things changed, mainly as a result of the leak. So what? Release dates change all the time. The voucher thing probably was a little over the top but fundamentally this isn't all that strange.But was the leak the main reason behind the game's delay? "No, the fundamental reason was because we underestimated the amount of work left to do and how long it was going to take, especially when the team were so demoralised after the leak." And what's still left to do on the game? "Tuning, tuning and more tuning," comes Gabe's reply.
I was referring to the nV cards he was comparing the 9600XT too :roll: </clarification>Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
...I fear many who believed they would be playing HL2 on thier 9600XT w/voucher won't have that card by the time the game gets here Worse yet, it'll probably run craptacular on a 9600XT*just a guess* thanks to the tweaking they are doing to the game now...
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: PointlesS
if it doesn't run well on a 9600XT then how will it run on a fx5200 or mx400 which is what the vast majority of people (sadly) have? I doubt you'll be running full details with everything on at a high (1024x768+) resolution...but I would expect the game to run pretty smooth in 1024x768 medium to high details...even the hl2 leak ran relatively decent on a lot of computers...
...1.The voucher didn't come with those cards so what's your point agian?...
Did the voucher come with the 9600XT or not?
I don't know what you just read but quote unquoteOriginally posted by: BFG10K
So initially the leak was the problem but things changed, mainly as a result of the leak. So what? Release dates change all the time. The voucher thing probably was a little over the top but fundamentally this isn't all that strange.But was the leak the main reason behind the game's delay? "No, the fundamental reason was because we underestimated the amount of work left to do and how long it was going to take, especially when the team were so demoralised after the leak." And what's still left to do on the game? "Tuning, tuning and more tuning," comes Gabe's reply.
In any case I love it how nVidia fanboys are now using this to discredit Gabe and call him a liar about his anti-nVidia comments. Make no mistake, nVidia was cheating at the time (and are possible doing so today as well) and ATi's SM 2.0 performance was superior across the board. The fact that the game slipped makes no difference to the fact that Gabe knows what he's talking about when it comes to 3D coding.
And finally, this topic should be in software since it has absolutely nothing to do with video. Yet again VIAN is using the forum as his personal dumping ground.
quite distinctly says it wasn't ready anyways and the leak only exacerbated things.But was the leak the main reason behind the game's delay? "No, the fundamental reason was because we underestimated the amount of work left to do and how long it was going to take, especially when the team were so demoralised after the leak." And what's still left to do on the game? "Tuning, tuning and more tuning," comes Gabe's reply.