At one time, microdrive based portable storage (a microdrive in a small enclosure with a USB dongle) was the only reasonable way to get significant (4GB+) portable storage. But flash based portable storgage is now dropping like a stone. Most of these flash based units use a proprietary all-in-one system board with controllers and memory, with a case and a USB dongle.
OK, so my question is: If the cost is similiar, is there any reason to opt for the microdrive based storage?
From what I understand, flash based media has a limited number of read/write cycles. This not something that would ever bother the average user, but could easily be approached if/when someone decides to use flash memory to launch a portable operating system.
How about I/O? Can the flash based units come close? Does it matter?
Are flash memory based units poised to overtake microdrives in terms of capacities offered at a reasonable price?
Obviously, microdrives are more susceptable to physical disruption--a strong point for flash media.
Kwad
OK, so my question is: If the cost is similiar, is there any reason to opt for the microdrive based storage?
From what I understand, flash based media has a limited number of read/write cycles. This not something that would ever bother the average user, but could easily be approached if/when someone decides to use flash memory to launch a portable operating system.
How about I/O? Can the flash based units come close? Does it matter?
Are flash memory based units poised to overtake microdrives in terms of capacities offered at a reasonable price?
Obviously, microdrives are more susceptable to physical disruption--a strong point for flash media.
Kwad