What is a credible source?I actually asked you repeatedly what you meant but you refused to answer. Funny how you refused to specify and then start whining about people making shit up. You're just flailing now.
What is this bizarre ranting? Are you drunk already? If you can't see why Breitbart is a non-credible source nothing anyone is going to say to you will change that.
I'll take the guardian for one. NPR for another.What is a credible source?
Because it couldn't be used to further their agendas. That is to destroy Republicans.While everyone is talking about Trump's *ussy talk from 11 years ago... this didn't seem to bother anyone.
One that doesn't routinely contradict itself without apology or retraction, and can be confirmed through other, independent sources.What is a credible source?
More like, if Breitbart put up an article saying that water is dry, would you and LK believe it?If Breitbart puts up an article saying water is wet, is it wet?
I wouldn't.More like, if Breitbart put up an article saying that water is dry, would you and LK believe it?
Yes, because the Republican agenda is to help Democrats.Because it couldn't be used to further their agendas. That is to destroy Republicans.
I'm not so sure of that. Given enough partisan incentive, I believe your ego would find a way to convince itself.I wouldn't.
Better! Breitbart reports Obama/Hillary/Dems/Libtards/etc. saying water is wet. Now would LK insist water is dry?More like, if Breitbart put up an article saying that water is dry, would you and LK believe it?
That would make me start to wonder.Better! Breitbart reports Obama/Hillary/Dems/Libtards/etc. saying water is wet. Now would LK insist water is dry?
Yeah, choosing illegals over Americans. Great job!
I mourn for our media sources, the Wikileaks emails showed collusion, and I hate the Breitbart/Drudge stuff, it's spun just as bad from the other end of the spectrum.
I know the whole "equal time" law i grew up with was unworkable, but I really wish the media would be more neutral.
So cnn and nbc doesn't apply. Next?One that doesn't routinely contradict itself without apology or retraction, and can be confirmed through other, independent sources.
I said all along that QE/monetary flows is keeping yields down. This is 100% provable by negative yields across the globe in QE heavy areas and funds chasing yields in areas where there is no QE. Ask any fixed income fund manager whether they see this, every single one will tell you they do. Go ahead, ask Gross, Gundlach, Fink, Black, anybody.
You weren't just wrong, you were horribly wrong. What I said all along, happened, and you are fucking wrong again. You're an arrogant putrid pile of shit. And instead of learning from it, you double down. Sad.
I've been pestering Nilay Patel The Verge editor about trying to be more neutral, he lives in this bubble, and can't see it, and claims they're not biased, and didn't endorse anyone, despite Vox media mentioned repeatedly as an ally in the Wikileaks dump, and dozens of references to The Verge articles supporting Hillary in the "Daily Briefing" emails the campaign sent out, then I see an article about "Perfect music to Protest With". Sigh...
I guess their demographics are more geared towards more younger and liberal readers, so I just gave up.
I'd prefer the russians stop more than Soros.https://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=George soros
Soros needs to quit screwing around in US politics.
I'd prefer the russians stop more than Soros.
Where did I defend CNN or NBC? Your arguments are always just a race to the bottom. That's why I stopped taking you seriously.So cnn and nbc doesn't apply. Next?
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=George soros
Soros needs to quit screwing around in US politics.
alexsoros The question is, which of these flags will fall first?