Pruitt resigns!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,135
2,445
126
"Both sides" right? If they take corporate money, obviously they are corrupt, right? Its not like we could actually look at a politicians actions or a party's actions as a whole and determine who/where their priorities are, right? Its not like we have clear cut examples of one party enabling consumer protections and bank regulations, when they have control of government and another party doing the exact opposite when they have control.

We deserve the government we get and we get a shitty government because there are more idiots like you, who resort to intellectual laziness, who claim "both sides" are the same.

You have a really strange way of trying to bring people over to your side. If anything, I probably would have voted for Bernie Sanders if given the chance during the last election, because I actually believed the words that he said. I didn't agree with all of them, but at least he seemed sincere. With Clinton, it always felt like she was telling me what she thought we wanted to hear just to get elected, only to end up with another 4 or 8 years of corporate overlords pulling the strings behind the scenes.

I hope that moderate Democrats learned the lesson from 2016... it's going to take more than "Vote for us, she's at least 25% less crooked than Trump!" to win the next election.
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,446
106
Well... sure, why not? Since we're already talking about corporate shills, why not throw in the Clinton campaign as well? Democrats shouldn't pretend that her campaign wasn't also bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists... they just worked in different industries than the folks supporting the people with the red MAGA hats did.
Because why not both sides this bitch?
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,446
106
Hard to imagine what a bigger swamp creature could possible look like for this job.

Apart from being happy he is going, I can't help but wonder about it. Why now? He's already waded through so much shit without anyone at the WH even acknowledging it. Why stop? It makes me think there is something even bigger he's trying to prevent from coming to light.
Agreed. I think something came up that he wasn't going to be able to ignore.
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,446
106
You have a really strange way of trying to bring people over to your side. If anything, I probably would have voted for Bernie Sanders if given the chance during the last election, because I actually believed the words that he said. I didn't agree with all of them, but at least he seemed sincere. With Clinton, it always felt like she was telling me what she thought we wanted to hear just to get elected, only to end up with another 4 or 8 years of corporate overlords pulling the strings behind the scenes.

I hope that moderate Democrats learned the lesson from 2016... it's going to take more than "Vote for us, she's at least 25% less crooked than Trump!" to win the next election.
I don't think he's trying to bring you over to his side. Lost causes are a drain, ya know? I don't blame him for not trying.

25%? Please! She wouldn't have jeopardized the country, its allies, the environment, health, education, people of color, women 75% of what Trump has done. And if you're honest with yourself you know that's true. Very few people thought Hillary was without flaw and that is absolutely a realistic way to elect an official. What the Cultists have done has endangered not only the people they want to hurt but also themselves. I preferred Bernie myself but when the options were Trump or Hillary... Hands down Hillary! Status quo would have been a hell of a lot better than the misery Trump and Putin are visiting upon us. But by all means stay on your side of the fence, the extreme wedgie must be exhilarating... stimulating?
 
Last edited:

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,446
106
Hope everyone loves #2 in charge. A known climate denier. LMAO
What a weird thing to laugh about. So you're the "it's just a flesh wound" kind of guy? Funny on Monty Python, pathetic in reality.

If the new guy is worse, I'm sure everything will work out just fine for you specifically. Dumbass!
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
What a weird thing to laugh about. So you're the "it's just a flesh wound" kind of guy? Funny on Monty Python, pathetic in reality.

If the new guy is worse, I'm sure everything will work out just fine for you specifically. Dumbass!

Youre the dumbass if you think he'll make any significant changes.

LOL
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,493
3,159
136
Pruitt's gone?
Well.... NOW we can all breathe a sigh of Relief.
Just not Trump's EPA air.
That air still stinks to high heaven.
Trump has already appointed a replacement to make sure of THAT.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Most corrupt official in the EPA's history, clearly taking kickbacks from the fossil fuel industry and abusing his position for creature comforts and nepotism, but okay, "great job." I wonder what it would take you to actually condemn a Republican official or politician for criminal action... watching them shoot someone on camera? Even then, you'd probably cheer them on.
He only cares if a Democrat does it. Republicans automatically get a free pass on corruption in his book.
 

Phenzyn

Member
Mar 18, 2018
137
72
61
I don't think he's trying to bring you over to his side. Lost causes are a drain, ya know? I don't blame him for not trying.

25%? Please! She wouldn't have jeopardized the country, its allies, the environment, health, education, people of color, women 75% of what Trump has done. And if you're honest with yourself you know that's true. Very few people thought Hillary was without flaw and that is absolutely a realistic way to elect an official. What the Cultists have done has endangered not only the people they want to hurt but also themselves. I preferred Bernie myself but when the options were Trump or Hillary... Hands down Hillary! Status quo would have been a hell of a lot better than the misery Trump and Putin are visiting upon us. But by all means stay on your side of the fence, the extreme wedgie must be exhilarating... stimulating?
I completely understand and agree with your point, but I understand Bob's point as well.

He said "I hope that moderate Democrats learned the lesson from 2016... it's going to take more than "Vote for us, she's at least 25% less crooked than Trump!" to win the next election."

And this echo's my feelings exactly. The big thing many democrats on this board seem to keep forgetting is that people don't vote. This country is a liberal country, and all things being equal, the democrats should be winning most of the time. I can go through issue by issue and show where studies have absolutely shown most of the US is on the same page, whether it's abortion, health care, etc etc.

Since I was born, 7 of the 8 elections that have taken place have had more votes for the democratic nominee (popular vote), including this last one and the one in 2000 when W was elected. Only in 2004 did a republican win the popular vote. That means most people are voting for the democrats.

The issue lies in the 3rd party voters (Jill Stein, libertarian, etc) which become wasted votes along with the millions upon millions of people who didn't vote at all. With the latter obviously being a much larger problem.

How are the democrats going to affect change if the best they can offer is the 2nd most hated candidate in the history of this country? Sure, Trump just happened to be the 1st most hated candidate in the history of this country, so it made sense that the democrats should match that up against the 2nd most hated, and roll the dice. Right?

The DNC should be winning almost all the time, if they weren't so ignorant of the people who don't votte. They would have won with Hillary any way, if they weren't so stupid. We can go over the numerous mistakes she made, some of which were blatantly stupid to anyone with a brain, its not important, but the facts should always be known. The people who don't vote, don't vote for a reason, and Hillary made voting for a lot of people seem irrelevant.

If we isolate ourselves, as liberals, as democrats, as whatever you ascribe to be, away from the faults of the DNC, the democratic party and the democratic nominations, we simply look like cultists like the GOP undoubtedly is. That's not who we are. We won't be winning votes from those people who aren't voting (namely people my age). We are about the facts, even if they are facts we don't like. Hillary was as corrupt a politician as we've ever seen, with 2 decades of it to back up anyone who looks at her record. She was not the person America wanted and now we are all paying the price because of their hubris. They didn't think they could lose. They were wrong.

What is it about other people on the left that can't see the criticism with the dems and Hillary and simply admit that its true? You can both hate Hillary, and have voted for her - and wish she was president. While also hate the DNC and the democrats for putting you in that situation to begin with, and hate them even more for helping to elect Trump. Because make no mistake, the DNC and the democrats are, even in some small part, responsible for Trump winning by putting up Hillary against him, or at the very least for not campaigning more in the states that would have made it harder to lose.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: MrSquished

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,140
2,176
136
Good. A big stinky turd flushed down the toilet.

Can I have his used Trump hotel mattress?
 

Phenzyn

Member
Mar 18, 2018
137
72
61
Concern trolls always go for the crooked Hillary angle.
Yes, you just keep believing that everyone who didn't like Hillary, and still doesn't - are "concern trolling".

It's clear to me that you don't care at all about anyone else's POV that doesn't 100% align with your own, even if they 98% align with you.

Your last post I saw was about as trump humper as it gets BTW, arguing that Hillary was only given one question in that debate??? instead of an email with EVERY single question from the debate. You basically have the same small mind you hate the trump supporters for.

And clearly must be in love with Hillary
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,447
15,262
136
You have a really strange way of trying to bring people over to your side. If anything, I probably would have voted for Bernie Sanders if given the chance during the last election, because I actually believed the words that he said. I didn't agree with all of them, but at least he seemed sincere. With Clinton, it always felt like she was telling me what she thought we wanted to hear just to get elected, only to end up with another 4 or 8 years of corporate overlords pulling the strings behind the scenes.

I hope that moderate Democrats learned the lesson from 2016... it's going to take more than "Vote for us, she's at least 25% less crooked than Trump!" to win the next election.

Lol my side? You mean the side of logic, facts and reasoning?

The lesson learned from 2016 is for Democrats to keep doing what they've been doing, except do it in even more areas.

As far as Clinton goes, yeah, she's horrible at politicking. Bernie on the other hand is great at it, its who he's a career politician with zero legislative accomplishments of any importance.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Yes, you just keep believing that everyone who didn't like Hillary, and still doesn't - are "concern trolling".

It's clear to me that you don't care at all about anyone else's POV that doesn't 100% align with your own, even if they 98% align with you.

Your last post I saw was about as trump humper as it gets BTW, arguing that Hillary was only given one question in that debate??? instead of an email with EVERY single question from the debate. You basically have the same small mind you hate the trump supporters for.

And clearly must be in love with Hillary

Yep. Going on about the evil Hillary in a thread about Scott Pruitt & then doubling down on the trollery with false accusations & personal attack as well.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,447
15,262
136
I completely understand and agree with your point, but I understand Bob's point as well.

He said "I hope that moderate Democrats learned the lesson from 2016... it's going to take more than "Vote for us, she's at least 25% less crooked than Trump!" to win the next election."

And this echo's my feelings exactly. The big thing many democrats on this board seem to keep forgetting is that people don't vote. This country is a liberal country, and all things being equal, the democrats should be winning most of the time. I can go through issue by issue and show where studies have absolutely shown most of the US is on the same page, whether it's abortion, health care, etc etc.

Since I was born, 7 of the 8 elections that have taken place have had more votes for the democratic nominee (popular vote), including this last one and the one in 2000 when W was elected. Only in 2004 did a republican win the popular vote. That means most people are voting for the democrats.

The issue lies in the 3rd party voters (Jill Stein, libertarian, etc) which become wasted votes along with the millions upon millions of people who didn't vote at all. With the latter obviously being a much larger problem.

How are the democrats going to affect change if the best they can offer is the 2nd most hated candidate in the history of this country? Sure, Trump just happened to be the 1st most hated candidate in the history of this country, so it made sense that the democrats should match that up against the 2nd most hated, and roll the dice. Right?

The DNC should be winning almost all the time, if they weren't so ignorant of the people who don't votte. They would have won with Hillary any way, if they weren't so stupid. We can go over the numerous mistakes she made, some of which were blatantly stupid to anyone with a brain, its not important, but the facts should always be known. The people who don't vote, don't vote for a reason, and Hillary made voting for a lot of people seem irrelevant.

If we isolate ourselves, as liberals, as democrats, as whatever you ascribe to be, away from the faults of the DNC, the democratic party and the democratic nominations, we simply look like cultists like the GOP undoubtedly is. That's not who we are. We won't be winning votes from those people who aren't voting (namely people my age). We are about the facts, even if they are facts we don't like. Hillary was as corrupt a politician as we've ever seen, with 2 decades of it to back up anyone who looks at her record. She was not the person America wanted and now we are all paying the price because of their hubris. They didn't think they could lose. They were wrong.

What is it about other people on the left that can't see the criticism with the dems and Hillary and simply admit that its true? You can both hate Hillary, and have voted for her - and wish she was president. While also hate the DNC and the democrats for putting you in that situation to begin with, and hate them even more for helping to elect Trump. Because make no mistake, the DNC and the democrats are, even in some small part, responsible for Trump winning by putting up Hillary against him, or at the very least for not campaigning more in the states that would have made it harder to lose.

The data doesn't agree with your findings.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,447
15,262
136
Which findings are those?

That people don't vote? Or didn't want to vote in 2016? Or that we are a liberal country?

Your conclusion was that Democrats aren't winning because of who they pick to run for office. That is wrong. The evidence shows, when Democrats decide to actually run, they win.

The Democrats biggest issue, isn't their message, it isn't who they choose to run, its that they don't bother running anyone in the first place. Its why Democrats are winning races they thought were previously pure red strongholds.

That's the lesson to be learned.
 

Phenzyn

Member
Mar 18, 2018
137
72
61
Your conclusion was that Democrats aren't winning because of who they pick to run for office. That is wrong. The evidence shows, when Democrats decide to actually run, they win.

The Democrats biggest issue, isn't their message, it isn't who they choose to run, its that they don't bother running anyone in the first place. Its why Democrats are winning races they thought were previously pure red strongholds.

That's the lesson to be learned.
First off your conclusion was wrong. You are seemingly taking this one example of the 2016 election and act like I am applying that to every election for every seat in government.

The issue I highlighted is that people don't vote. Namely young people.

The first result on google shows "57.6 million people, or 28.5% of estimated eligible voters" voted in the 2016 election. I have also seen other numbers that say up to 50% of eligible voters voted. Either way, its too small a number.

I am speaking of personal experience, but I fail to see how you all don't know at least some people in my boat. Perhaps you two (you and john) are simply much older then I am, and your circle all agree to vote for the democrat regardless of that candidates positions. But most people don't care about the side, they care about the person. Those are the people the democrats have to win over, and they can do so with the right person. Obama was the right person. Hillary was not.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,726
2,073
136
Most corrupt official in the EPA's history, clearly taking kickbacks from the fossil fuel industry and abusing his position for creature comforts and nepotism, but okay, "great job." I wonder what it would take you to actually condemn a Republican official or politician for criminal action... watching them shoot someone on camera? Even then, you'd probably cheer them on.
Become a Democrat?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,859
25,347
136
Good. A big stinky turd flushed down the toilet.

Can I have his used Trump hotel mattress?

Unfortunately replaced by another stinky turd who will call a bit less attention to himself but still do everything he can to crash the EPA.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |