Uh...?
I am talking about you trying to pass off Android as "cheap, glitchy" and iPhones as "expensive, restricted" as if that's some kind of fact, when it's not. Simple as that. You then said 99% are glitchy, so I'm asking for proof.
Sorry; you're just getting really defensive, which in turn makes me really defensive. Which in turn makes me frustrated, 'cause I'm trying to take up the neutral position. I wasn't attacking your personal choice of phone, ya know?
I don't have any 'studies' or anything to show you. I'm simply going off of a wide variety of experience, general industry opinion, ect.
It's already been stated in this thread; if it wasn't by me, some others surely have chimed in...but the gist of it is:
Android is a universal OS loaded on to various models of phone made by various manufacturers utilizing tons of different hardware configurations. It is simply going to be in its nature that there will be more problems than with a manufacturer who is making their own OS for what is essentially a complete line of...one device.
That is in no way a statement that Apple is superior. Again; I fucking hate Apple with a passion that I must restrain on these forums. But I acknowledge the fundamental advantages of their products, little as they personally mean to me.
These high-end, lightning fast Android phones are (IMO) basically overpowered. They're using oodles of processing power, tons of RAM, and big batteries to overcome inefficiency. Yes, some manufacturers are doing much better at ironing the kinks out of their phones, but they can only account for the OEM software. Installing other apps that are, again, not programmed for one simplified platform, increases the probability of issues. Heck, software installed by cell carriers can often cause problems.
These are not attacks on [insert Android product of choice]. They are the inevitabilities of an open platform.