This is entire incident happening at all is 100% the fault of the police chief there. This innocent and falsely accused mans repeated anal sexual assault and raping would not have happened at all if the police chief had not thought it was a perfectly acceptable police practice to do it, even with absolutely no credible evidence what so ever to even justify it in the first place.
So just because an irrational and unthinking drug dog smells some guys dirty butt on the car seat and gets all excited over it is now grounds to search a mans rectum repeatedly for supposedly hiding drugs so far up in his intestines they need a colonoscopy to find it after he failed to completely stop at a stop sign?
Don't all dogs tend to get excited over sniffing some nasty butt hole? Because that's pretty much what dogs enjoy doing, anyhow. Just because they pin a phony cracker jack tin badge on rovers collar does not magically make the dog a thinking and rational creature, which we would normally assume the cops are supposed to be. If the cops can't figure out that a drug dog naturally likes to sniff a dirty crack and always gets excited while doing it, then they sure don't need to be pretending to use drug dogs for their questionable probable cause drug searches in the first place.
So called "DRUG DOGS" used for questionable "probable cause" searches that have to be lead around and directed and even forced by the officers to "find the drugs" all based on a promise of a tasty treat if they do, is the biggest farce being legally accepted as a fact in the phony "war on drugs".
And the laughable video statement the chief made about following all the rules and procedures has already proven to be false just based on the documents, and he is now publicly on record being deceitful about the case to try to justify it and cover it all up because he authorized the repeated anal sexual assault and raping for absolutely no reason in the first place.
Essentially the cops were basically treating this completely innocent person the same exact way they would treat a CONVICTED PRISONER IN JAIL who was suspected of having drugs shoved up his rear end. Which is why the screwed up chief there felt completely justified for his actions.
Maybe the whole police force there deserves to be anally raped for hours too, since their drug dog who enjoys sniffing dirty ass is their flimsy and pathetic excuse for torturing and raping someones rectum just for kicks without a shred of tangible proof otherwise.
And the worst part of all this is, the Supreme Court last year rubber stamped this kind of sick, perverted and sadistic behavior on the part of law enforcement not that long ago, just in case some of you brainwashed conservative police apologists missed that important civil rights case.
How the US Uses Sexual Humiliation as a Political Tool to Control the Masses
by Naomi Wolf
In a five-four ruling this week, the supreme court decided that anyone can be strip-searched upon arrest for any offense, however minor, at any time. This horror show ruling joins two recent horror show laws: the NDAA, which lets anyone be arrested forever at any time, and HR 347, the "trespass bill", which gives you a 10-year sentence for protesting anywhere near someone with secret service protection. These criminalizations of being human follow, of course, the mini-uprising of the Occupy movement.
Is American strip-searching benign? The man who had brought the initial suit, Albert Florence, described having been told to "turn around. Squat and cough. Spread your cheeks." He said he felt humiliated: "It made me feel like less of a man."
In surreal reasoning, justice Anthony Kennedy explained that this ruling is necessary because the 9/11 bomber could have been stopped for speeding. How would strip searching him have prevented the attack? Did justice Kennedy imagine that plans to blow up the twin towers had been concealed in a body cavity? In still more bizarre non-logic, his and the other justices' decision rests on concerns about weapons and contraband in prison systems. But people under arrest that is, who are not yet convicted haven't been introduced into a prison population.
Read MORE HERE:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/04/06-8
(reposted my comment here for relevancy since multiple similar topics are allowed in different areas then.)