LinuxIdiot
Golden Member
- May 20, 2002
- 1,209
- 0
- 0
Firefox for greasemonkey scripts ftw.
Good thing chrome can run those scripts natively
Firefox for greasemonkey scripts ftw.
Good thing chrome can run those scripts natively
SAFARI is the worst browser I have ever come across. It's slow, freezes up all the time, has horrible plugin support, heavier than chrome/ie/firefox, etc... even Mac users hate it... how can anyone say it's good?
SAFARI is the worst browser I have ever come across. It's slow, freezes up all the time, has horrible plugin support, heavier than chrome/ie/firefox, etc... even Mac users hate it... how can anyone say it's good?
Never liked her show, never thought she was a good actress.
...
You guys keep saying battery life... the only battery in my DESKTOP is the RTC battery. That little CR2032 lasts for YEARS. :hmm:
yeah, but who uses a mac desktop? 0.o
i kid... the imac is kinda sexy if you don't need a good graphics card and have a NAS.
This, holy hell Safari sucks balls. Why must Apple keep working on it?
Maybe they should hand it off to someone who knows how to make a good browser and only handle the UI end of it themselves. At this point IE is better than Safari, even though it's ugly.
As a former Mac user it seems Apple's best apps are their Mac-only ones. iPhoto, Garage Band, iWork, I don't know what else but they all seem better than the likes of iTunes, Safari, and QuickTime.
Have we not gotten past the browser wars yet? Why do people still care to argue over their preferred browser?
It's not great in Windows but in OSX it's perfect, I love it and it's the browser for me.
SAFARI is the worst browser I have ever come across. It's slow, freezes up all the time, has horrible plugin support, heavier than chrome/ie/firefox, etc... even Mac users hate it... how can anyone say it's good?