Yes, this latest failed "gotcha" and all the ones before it were just a disagreement on policy!
/faceplam
Yes, this latest failed "gotcha" and all the ones before it were just a disagreement on policy!This is classic Republican logic. Any disagreement means trying to overturn the election.
Trump I disagree with your trade policy. "Stop trying to overturn the election".
Trump you should be less racist and better behaved. "Stop trying to overturn the election".
We are like 6 months away from the next one. Let's give it a rest already with the overturning elections stuff particularly as the last one shows the will of the people is clearly not in his favor anyway.
I want to hear more about your pro-crime agenda.Yes, this latest failed "gotcha" and all the ones before it were just a disagreement on policy!
/faceplam
Meet the burden of proof and we''ll talk.I want to hear more about your pro-crime agenda.
I feel like this is the next piece of the strategy for the House. Continue to investigate, and allow information to continuously drip out. Republicans have no idea what they are covering up, and make them pay for their votes.Lastly, there is nothing stopping the house from continuing with the investigations you mentioned. In fact I’m very confident we’ll be hearing from Bolton and Parnas very soon.
Republicans don't have a burden of proof to meet. To paraphrase popehat, their standard isn't "just one more document", it's "go fuck yourself".Meet the burden of proof and we''ll talk.
Show us proof that his job and salary where because of his "Daddy". Just because that is what you have been lead to believe without proof doesn't make it fact. Also, while you are at it, show us where it is $500,000.. I believe you meant $50,000. I grantee you that Trump's kids are making millions, not thousands because of Daddy's Presidency. Only a blind buffoon would dispute that.Hey, you forgot to post the CNN article criticizing Trump for having an all-white legal team (not a joke by the way).
Let me know when Sekulow's son is getting paid $500,000 a month working in the Ukraine because of his daddy.
as usual you show your ignorance! You don`t know what voter suppression is....now that is classic!! hahaaaAren't you from California? You haven't even had the opportunity to vote for a Republican for US Senate in 6/8/10 years due to the gerrymandering of the State and yet somehow it's the Republicans who are suppressing the vote ?
Dude,l what are you concderned about? I said it won`t happen!! You know why? Because i also watched the coverage! Not on FOX like you probably did!!If you had watched the coverage a bit more closely you would have seen where Chief Justice Roberts answered that exact question. In case of a tie, it would not pass.
John Roberts, as Senate trial nears end, finally says he won't break ties
Chief Justice John Roberts made crystal clear Friday night that he has no intention of intervening in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump by casting a tie-breaking vote.www.cnn.com
"
Here's the exchange:
Schumer: "Is the chief justice aware that in the impeachment trial of President Johnson, Chief Justice Chase, as presiding officer, cast tie-breaking votes on both March 31 and April 2, 1868?"
Roberts: "I am, Mr. Leader. The one concerned a motion to adjourn; the other concerned a motion to close deliberations. I do not regard those isolated episodes 150 years ago as sufficient to support a general authority to break ties. If the members of this body elected by the people and accountable to them divide equally on a motion, the normal rule is that the motion fails. I think it would be inappropriate for me, an unelected official from a different branch of government, to assert the power to change that result so that the motion would succeed."
So, embrace corruption you say? It's obvious that the Republican party, or at least those that still support Trump have done just that. We just witnessed it first hand with the Impeachment. I think you have made it clear where the problem is, and it isn't the democrats. The sad part, is some day, you and many other's will realize your mistake. I just hope that it's before we are no long a democratic society, if that hasn't already been completely destroyed already due to the actions of the Current Senate.Integrity?
/shrug
A good start would be accepting Trump's presidency instead of constantly trying, and failing, to oust him.
I know: it'll never happen. That's been made very clear.
Was met. Did you miss it? Many R senators confirmed it in their statements even saying that they will vote to acquit not because he's innocent, but because they don't think the offense meets the level of the punishment.Meet the burden of proof and we''ll talk.
Republicans don't have a burden of proof to meet. To paraphrase popehat, their standard isn't "just one more document", it's "go fuck yourself".
Dude,l what are you concderned about? I said it won`t happen!! You know why? Because i also watched the coverage! Not on FOX like you probably did!!
Yes because Fox shows a different live stream than everyone else.
Thats not entirely true.Actually they did. During the house managers three days they had the hearing on in a little window with no sound.
Pedantry is a wonderful ethos.
Thanks for proving my point.
Pedantry is a wonderful ethos.
You said Fox didnt air the house managers with sound, except they put it in a little window. Yep they did that, but they DID air the house managers with sound also. The biggest difference is they didnt air much in the evening. But your statement is patently false.
During commercial breaks, the live coverage would air in a little box next to ads, just as it would sit in a little box in the corner at some points during the shows themselves.
I watched them do it myself. Had you read the fucking article you linked to you would see that they backed up my claim.
Fuck! I hate stupid people!
Fuck I do too! I guess you didnt read when I said "Yep they did that " and I guess youre blind as fuck since you didnt see the pics of Adam, full screen. You implied the only coverage they had was soundless in a corner. But then, maybe youre not good at formulating sentences. Either way, your implied statement is false.
You said Fox didnt air the house managers with sound, except they put it in a little window. Yep they did that, but they DID air the house managers with sound also. The biggest difference is they didnt air much in the evening. But your statement is patently false.
So now you are a fucking liar as well?
From your own fucking post:
What’s worse than stupid people? A fucking dumb ass liar.
Serious question. Are you drunk?