I wish, then maybe your posts wouldn’t be so fucking stupid.
Serious question. Are you drunk?
edit: anyway Im not going to continue with this stupid dialogue. Final point is, we partially agree. Did Fox put the hearing in a box with no sound? Yes. Did they they do it for the majority of the house panel's arguments? No. Did they air less of the hearing than other networks? Yes.
Not sure how more clear I can be. I sure seemed to trigger you though.
Well back to the original question then, did the fox stream differ from the other networks?
___________
'._==_==_=_.'
.-\: /-.
| (|:. |) |
'-|:. |-'
\::. /
'::. .'
) (
_.' '._
`"""""""`Read my edit.
Oh, and you can always ignore me. *shrug*
I think the house should start impeaching Trump a second time with an extensive list of charges and go to court to bring in the witnesses. Take it to the ends of the earth even if it means destroying the integrity, the little of it that remains, of the Supreme Court. It's revolution time, seems to me, if we really mean to save our country from a Mafia Dictatorship.
Republican senators have already stated this was met. Rubio and Alexander both have directly stated that. However they came up with other reasons not to impeach. Rubio claimed it would further divide the country and Alexander said election interference and politically motivated investigations for personal benefit wasn't impeachable in and of itself.Meet the burden of proof and we''ll talk.
Yes, this latest failed "gotcha" and all the ones before it were just a disagreement on policy!
/faceplam
I think the house should start impeaching Trump a second time with an extensive list of charges and go to court to bring in the witnesses. Take it to the ends of the earth even if it means destroying the integrity, the little of it that remains, of the Supreme Court. It's revolution time, seems to me, if we really mean to save our country from a Mafia Dictatorship.
Integrity?
/shrug
A good start would be accepting Trump's presidency instead of constantly trying, and failing, to oust him.
I know: it'll never happen. That's been made very clear.
Democrats have a brain defect and this is exactly where it reveals itself to those not similarly infected.Democrats don't have it in them to stand up the way they need to. We have one crazy party abetted by Fox News which is willing to tear down everything to achieve their goals (lining their own pockets) and another which is too weak to stop them. We are truly f'd as a country.
The only time they can face their shame is when it's time to gloat.A whole lot of Republican fonts have shown up in this thread since the actual portion of the trial where evidence was presented has concluded.
Sure have. It's a fairly common phenomenon, they only show up to "gloat."A whole lot of Republican fonts have shown up in this thread since the actual portion of the trial where evidence was presented has concluded.
Discussions based on the merits are far beyond their limited capabilities.Sure have. It's a fairly common phenomenon, they only show up to "gloat."
Remember when she said that impeachment was a bad idea? I do.
Maybe she should've stuck with that.
As I've already stated, my bad for not remembering a political anecdote that I learned 30 years ago.
I guess you don't read, either.
Hunter was making a reported $80K a month, not $500. A named board member for Co looking for recognition, that's about it. Oh, lets not forget that Dump put Ivanka and Kushner into positions for which they had not one speck of relevant experience. As for outing the wistleblower, Dump nut-jobs actually fell for the "Hillary is running a child sex-slave ring" and shot the hell out of a DC pizza shop. Only the best people.Hey, you forgot to post the CNN article criticizing Trump for having an all-white legal team (not a joke by the way).
Let me know when Sekulow's son is getting paid $500,000 a month working in the Ukraine because of his daddy.
Remember guys, Trump and Republicans really care about corruption and nepotism.Hunter was making a reported $80K a month, not $500. A named board member for Co looking for recognition, that's about it. Oh, lets not forget that Dump put Ivanka and Kushner into positions for which they had not one speck of relevant experience. As for outing the wistleblower, Dump nut-jobs actually fell for the "Hillary is running a child sex-slave ring" and shot the hell out of a DC pizza shop. Only the best people.
Remember guys, Trump and Republicans really care about corruption and nepotism.
Hunter was making a reported $80K a month, not $500. A named board member for Co looking for recognition, that's about it. Oh, lets not forget that Dump put Ivanka and Kushner into positions for which they had not one speck of relevant experience. As for outing the wistleblower, Dump nut-jobs actually fell for the "Hillary is running a child sex-slave ring" and shot the hell out of a DC pizza shop. Only the best people.
In all fairness that was what taj and qliveur sent elected them to the senate to do.You mean like the hundreds of laws the House did pass that aresitting in Moscow Mitch's wastebasketunder consideration by the Senate. Reality is that the House has been very productive, doing the job Americans sent them to Washington to do. The Senate Republicans, on the other hand, have been stacking the courts, appeasing Putin, and pocketing money from their oligarch masters.
Maybe in another lifetime however I think it's belly up time for the Dems but maybe we'll win in November. What you mention should have been done in this attempt, but as I suppose we're not to let mediocrity stand in the way of ineptitude. Remember when we were talking about citing witnesses with contempt and arresting people? Well that's just bluster it seems.
It seems we'll declare victory and nothing of consequence happen, although it's fun to tag Trump with impeachment. At least history can say that happened.
Maybe in another lifetime however I think it's belly up time for the Dems but maybe we'll win in November. What you mention should have been done in this attempt, but as I suppose we're not to let mediocrity stand in the way of ineptitude. Remember when we were talking about citing witnesses with contempt and arresting people? Well that's just bluster it seems.
It seems we'll declare victory and nothing of consequence happen, although it's fun to tag Trump with impeachment. At least history can say that happened.
Here's the thing. They knew there was a risk of public seeing something actually easy to digest among the testimony and documents that were withheld. They knew there was a chance of him losing the base or else they wouldn't have pulled out all the stops to prevent that. And the insane thing is that they'd still have Pence, so it's the precedent they needed to prevent, because once one R politician is actually held accountable, it'd just be a matter of minutes before they all were.It was never going to be any more than that, no matter how it was played. If you thought otherwise, you were naive.