Mac Mini's are aawesome little machines. I have mine in a rack mount. It's very easy to upgrade the RAM.
Man has a point. If it's going to be a shiny pretty pile of junk for housewife-grade computing, it might as well be a fast-ish one.
It was immensely annoying though that with the new iMacs I can no longer order a non-Fusion HDD + SSD option. I don't need a 768Gb start SSD, so I went for 512's (with a 256/256 OS split) and had to buy external TB drives even just for a couple of Tb.
That makes 0 sense...
Clearly you have plenty of money if your going to buy the Haswell model after JUST BUYING the 2012 iMac.
Why would you settle for a 5400 rpm drive and complain about it when you HAVE money and are buying an overpriced Mac in the first place?
So what exactly are you going to do with this iMac when you get the new one? Sell it?
Oh people will buy it. Many are obsessed with Mac's and they will pay high price, I know. They will not however pay close to what you paid because it's still 'used' and it's lost value the minute you unboxed it.
Let this be a lesson.
If your going to spend thousands on a Mac you go all out on nearly everything.
Mac's are only getting thinner, which means they solder parts to the logic board and you cannot swap things out. They use mobile chips so there is little to no chance of upgrading.
You have money, clearly... You could have gotten even a small SSD and the machine would be good for a few years. Then you could use an external as media storage.
Big mistake.
It makes no sense you got a worse drive and are complaining about it.
Yeah that's a problem on both fronts.
1. SSD is essential in any high end/expensive computer.
2. I strongly prefer SSD + HDD over Fusion drive.
With #2, out of curiosity, why? Just minute control of the situation?
My experience with fusion drive so far (granted, it's been 3 days ) is that OS X seems to manage prioritizing writes, frequently read data, etc very efficiently.
Welp the new models were released this past week. I'm seriously debating whether or not I want to buy the new one like I had originally planned, or not. :hmm:
That makes 0 sense...
Clearly you have plenty of money if your going to buy the Haswell model after JUST BUYING the 2012 iMac.
Why would you settle for a 5400 rpm drive and complain about it when you HAVE money and are buying an overpriced Mac in the first place?
So what exactly are you going to do with this iMac when you get the new one? Sell it?
Oh people will buy it. Many are obsessed with Mac's and they will pay high price, I know. They will not however pay close to what you paid because it's still 'used' and it's lost value the minute you unboxed it.
Let this be a lesson.
If your going to spend thousands on a Mac you go all out on nearly everything.
Mac's are only getting thinner, which means they solder parts to the logic board and you cannot swap things out. They use mobile chips so there is little to no chance of upgrading.
You have money, clearly... You could have gotten even a small SSD and the machine would be good for a few years. Then you could use an external as media storage.
Big mistake.
Yes, you do
Congrats. Not a fan of the iMac as I like to hook up my laptop to my monitor if I need to.
Congrats. Not a fan of the iMac as I like to hook up my laptop to my monitor if I need to. However there are times I wish I had more storage space than the 512GB SSD I have. 768GB was insanely expensive. Now that you're looking to upgrade again, why not consider something like a rMBP?
My stance has not changed.Hey, relax guy.
edit: just realized it was an old post. Hopefully that guy relaxed.
My stance has not changed.
If your going to spend money on an iMac, why would you settle for weak internal components? 5400rpm drive, really...? You think it's convenient to replace it down the road?
Your already paying for overpriced hardware. Might as well pay a little more.
I have to say it's amazing to me that Apple still brazenly uses 5400rpm hard drives. I mean, I totally get that they use it to steer people into their even higher-profit options, but still, it's kinda shady. These days, even a $300 budget box from just about anyone else has at least a 7200rpm hard drive.
But see, this is exactly the thinking that to me shouldn't be part of Apple's business practices, which is why I find it kind of underhanded.5400 vs 7200 rpm, does the average user notice any difference. if not, who cares?