I went from a 955 @ 3.7 (2400 NB) to a 2500K.
With the 955 I was getting drops into the low 40's in certain area's on 64 player maps. GPU (GTX 470 825/1650/1900) 60% usage or below at those times.
The 2500K, even at stock, pegs the the 470 at 99% usage 90% of the time. At 4.3GHz, 99% usage almost solidly. The 40FPS dips turned into 55FPS, GPU bottlenecking 99% of the time.
If I had been able to take the 955 to 4.2GHz, I'm sure the 40FPS could have been turned into 45FPS but I'd never be able to go SLi/XF and see any benefit or fully utilize my current GPU.
LSS, I'm glad I purchased the 2500K. Such a good little power house of a CPU.
On the flip side, I think my 470 has become exhausted with the new CPU and might be dying... lol.
Enjoy the Sandy Bridge!
With the 955 I was getting drops into the low 40's in certain area's on 64 player maps. GPU (GTX 470 825/1650/1900) 60% usage or below at those times.
The 2500K, even at stock, pegs the the 470 at 99% usage 90% of the time. At 4.3GHz, 99% usage almost solidly. The 40FPS dips turned into 55FPS, GPU bottlenecking 99% of the time.
If I had been able to take the 955 to 4.2GHz, I'm sure the 40FPS could have been turned into 45FPS but I'd never be able to go SLi/XF and see any benefit or fully utilize my current GPU.
LSS, I'm glad I purchased the 2500K. Such a good little power house of a CPU.
On the flip side, I think my 470 has become exhausted with the new CPU and might be dying... lol.
Enjoy the Sandy Bridge!
Last edited: