- Jul 7, 2006
- 447
- 0
- 76
I'm having a lot of trouble finding good articles about why a Quadro should be purchased for video editing over a Geforce... especially considering that NVIDIA's Quadro vs. Geforce document is almost entirely about 3d and CAD optimizations, not video.
Has anyone seen any good write ups by folks other than fanboys or marketing nerds for why (or if) the Quadro has a significant performance gain in video rendering that can justify it's price point?
I'm looking to make a dedicated video (and possibly audio) editing workstation that will be primarily doing Premiere and some After Effects. I don't care about 3D performance for this build. Thus far, I've really only heard parroting of what sounded like marketing hype with things like "more precise" and "professional" when it comes to Quadro.
I could really use help cutting through the B.S. Any help appreciated.
Has anyone seen any good write ups by folks other than fanboys or marketing nerds for why (or if) the Quadro has a significant performance gain in video rendering that can justify it's price point?
I'm looking to make a dedicated video (and possibly audio) editing workstation that will be primarily doing Premiere and some After Effects. I don't care about 3D performance for this build. Thus far, I've really only heard parroting of what sounded like marketing hype with things like "more precise" and "professional" when it comes to Quadro.
I could really use help cutting through the B.S. Any help appreciated.