Discussion Qualcomm Snapdragon Thread

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
3,689
3,026
136
Do you mean the one about ARMv8 vs ARMv9? Isn't the main selling point of ARMv9, SVE2? If yes, losing it is no big deal in the current situation given that Qualcomm has disabled it in the current generation of chips
They did WAHT?!!

Sheesh, that's almost as bad as Samsung gimping the A57 to a 32 bit only chip in its first Exynos implementation 😅

That being said tho, SVE2 designs in mobile so far really take advantage of the higher vector width capacity.

X2 did have 256 bit units I think, but then X3 went back to multiple 128 bit units instead for some reason - possibly the same reason AMD are sticking with 256 bit instead of upgrading to 512 bit units in Zen4.
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,756
106
X2 did have 256 bit units I think, but then X3 went back to multiple 128 bit units instead for some reason - possibly the same reason AMD are sticking with 256 bit instead of upgrading to 512 bit units in Zen4.
This is very interesting. We talk about vector units for x86 cores all the time, but rarerly so for ARM cores.

What is the vector width of Cortex X4? What about Apple's P cores?
 
Last edited:

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,756
106
Doesn't concern me at all.

It's an interesting thing to measure with Geekbench, but in reality smartphones really don't see much benefit from better CPUs anymore, even with Android's less than efficient system architecture.
ST performance absolutely matters, and it is what determines how 'smooth' and 'snappy' a phone is.

We thought with Qualcomm making their custom cores, they will finally topple Apple's ST performance crown. But if this leak is true, that is not happening.

And that- is rather disappointing.
 
Last edited:

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
3,689
3,026
136
Ooo. What about Mediatek/Exynos/Tensor?
Problem is, I'm not even sure at this point what the average user would test it with.

Currently NEON seems to still be the main optimisation target for OSS like dav1d (AV1 software decoder), which given its much greater marketshare is understandable as only 2 generations of v9-A/SVE2 hw are out in the wild at the moment with a 3rd in rollout this quarter.
 

SarahKerrigan

Senior member
Oct 12, 2014
735
2,035
136
They did WAHT?!!

Sheesh, that's almost as bad as Samsung gimping the A57 to a 32 bit only chip in its first Exynos implementation 😅

That being said tho, SVE2 designs in mobile so far really take advantage of the higher vector width capacity.

X2 did have 256 bit units I think, but then X3 went back to multiple 128 bit units instead for some reason - possibly the same reason AMD are sticking with 256 bit instead of upgrading to 512 bit units in Zen4.

This is not the case. No Cortex-X or Cortex-A core has ever had SVE beyond 128b, probably to avoid issues when migrating threads between smaller and larger cores. The only devices with greater-than-128b SVE have been server silicon.
 

Nothingness

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2013
3,278
2,329
136
This is not the case. No Cortex-X or Cortex-A core has ever had SVE beyond 128b, probably to avoid issues when migrating threads between smaller and larger cores. The only devices with greater-than-128b SVE have been server silicon.
As far as I remember that's correct: Fugaku has SVE with 512-bit registers and Neoverse V1 has SVE with 256-bit registers. Both of these chips also are SVE only, not SVE2.
 

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
3,689
3,026
136
This is not the case. No Cortex-X or Cortex-A core has ever had SVE beyond 128b, probably to avoid issues when migrating threads between smaller and larger cores. The only devices with greater-than-128b SVE have been server silicon.
Ah therein was my confusion, I was equating V1 to X2 😅

I still don't get the whole migrating limits malarky tho.

Why not just finish the code currently running with larger vectors and then start running the rest with smaller vectors if the situation demands it?
 

SarahKerrigan

Senior member
Oct 12, 2014
735
2,035
136
Ah therein was my confusion, I was equating V1 to X2 😅

I still don't get the whole migrating limits malarky tho.

Why not just finish the code currently running with larger vectors and then start running the rest with smaller vectors if the situation demands it?

As far as I know, processes are architecturally permitted to be migrated at any time. There's no concept of a privileged SVE block during which migration is forbidden.

So does SVE2 not solve that issue?

SVE2 primarily adds to SVE. The basic mechanics have not changed.
 
Reactions: Viknet and soresu

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,756
106
Question: it is said that tile memory architecture which is used by smartphone GPUs (including Qualcomm Adreno), demands less memory bandwidth. In this case, is it the bandwidth of the RAM? Or the internal caches? Or both?
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,086
5,324
136
Found some numbers from 2017 to compare to. Interesting definition of "semiconductor company" in the above numbers. Companies that make chips using IP they own like Intel are included. Companies that don't make their own chips but own the IP like AMD are included. Companies that only make chips for others but don't own the IP like TSMC are included. And companies that make the equipment that makes the chips like ASML are included. That's about as wide of a net as you could cast without catching Apple, I suppose.


 
Reactions: moinmoin

qmech

Member
Jan 29, 2022
82
179
66
Very good catch that the omission of Apple seems to be an oddly specific one.

The source is the key to understanding this. When investing, one of the traditional key concepts is *industry* (not quite the same as *sector*, which is more encompassing). Companies in the same industry operate in the same sphere of business and often behave similarly and share underlying risks and cyclical trends.

The fact that Apple designs chips is wholly secondary in terms of its trends and underlying risks. It might well be critical to those of us here in a very technical forum and it does expose that these industries are somewhat arbitrary and some companies can be lopped into different ones by different investment firms or even into multiple ones. The larger a company gets and the more industries, the more nebulous the concept becomes.

Apple, for reference, is usually lopped into the big bucket industry of Information Technology.
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,756
106
The Snapdragon X Elite is not DOA. It will have a small time period to shine, before it's competitors arrive.

We know it's coming to laptops in mid-2024.

MTL is launching soon but it will stand no chance against X Elite. X Elite has better performance and efficiency. And also better AI performance (45 TOPS vs 10 TOPS for MTL per the latest leak).

X Elite's biggest threat is Strix Point. Strix Point will supposedly also launch in mid-2024, but as we all know it takes a few months for laptops with AMD APUs to show up.

If this holds, X Elite has a short time window to shine as the king of laptop performance, efficiency and AI performance, before Strix Point arrives.
 
Last edited:

soresu

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2014
3,689
3,026
136
And also better AI performance (45 TOPS vs 10 TOPS for MTL per the latest leak)
ODM's are playing a numbers game with this statistic hoping that the average consumer gets blinded by it into oooooooh reactions without actually researching whether it actually benefits them.

While the software possibilities show promise, much of the actual software that people associate with AI at the moment is server side.

Until a non dev oriented slate of applications (relevant to mobile/laptop power constraints) start showing minimum + recommended TOPS figures I would just take the AI penis measuring with a grain of salt.

On the consumer side AI/ML feels much like the early days of RTX right now.
 
Reactions: Thibsie

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,203
8,365
136
On the consumer side AI/ML feels much like the early days of RTX right now.
Is RTX actually beyond early days now? I don't think an average consumer is intending to look at the price class of GPUs necessary to make today's RTX run smoothly.

Locally accelerated AI/ML is looking to be available much more quickly in the hands of average consumers (if it isn't already through mobile phones). Software support should pick up accordingly.
 

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,756
106
🔥 Breaking News! 🔥

New report about Windows 12 has this to say about the Snapdragon X Elite:

Getting ready for the Snapdragon X Elite
One thing that's interesting is that Hudson Valley will be based on the Germanium platform release, and that platform update is set to hit RTM in April. However, Hudson Valley itself won't RTM until August, with a general release in September or October. The platform changes have more to do with the underlying tech, and it looks like Microsoft wants to have it ready earlier so that Arm devices powered by the Snapdragon X Elite can ship with it preinstalled.

Indeed, it's said that the Germanium platform has important changes for the Snapdragon X Elite and these PCs can't be shipped with the current version of Windows 11, but manufacturers want to ship them in June 2024. As such, these Arm-based PCs will ship with the Germanium platform release, but they won't have all the Hudson Valley features out of the box. They'll have to wait for the update coming a few months later, but it will simply be a cumulative update. For everyone else, Hudson Valley will release alongside the Germanium platform release as one big feature update, like Windows 11 was to Windows 10.
Source: https://www.xda-developers.com/windows-hudson-valley-update/

So I was right in guessing that PCs with the X Elite will be shipping with Windows 12. However the interesting thing this report mentions in that the full fat version of W12 won't be ready till August, so PCs with the X Elite debuting in June 2024 will be using an earlier "Germanium" build.
 
Last edited:

FlameTail

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2021
4,384
2,756
106
Snapdragon 8gen4 leak:


DCS: 8G4 is codenamed SUN, adopts 2+6 structure, and the production process is TSMC 3nm.

Furthermore, he made an interesting statement, saying, "The design performance of Qualcomm's Oryon architecture has significantly improved, posing a threat to Apple."


We constantly keep hearing about Phoenix-L and Phoenix-M. Does no one want to about these?
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |