No one has.
This whole ML boom is dumb.
Given the number of openbox returns, I don't think it's selling all that well.
This is a messier launch than MTL and PHX combined.
No one has.They have no AI feature to sell.
Given the number of openbox returns, I don't think it's selling all that well.Battery life is the selling feature
I agree. Though I was expecting at least Recall to be a launch feature for Copilot+ PCs.No one has.
This whole ML boom is dumb.
Do you have an idea of percentage?Given the number of openbox returns, I don't think it's selling all that well.
MS would hype literally anything that saves the Windows BU from complete total stagnation.Six months ago, Microsoft was hyping the "Windows AI"
Hard to grasp, we'll have to wait until esteemed analysts™ do a q3 PC TAM report.Do you have an idea of percentage?
It's fine, but it's a macbook expensive facebook machine while also being inferior to said macbooks at facebook machining.It looks like the Surface Laptop is the only competitive Copilot+ PC.
Wait, so Mali is leading against Adreno and ASi on an inferior fab node????We have 3DMark Steel Nomad Light power curves for 8 Gen 3 for the first time!
View attachment 102710View attachment 102711
As you can see, the 8 Gen 3 does well in the ancient GFXBench, but gets clobbered in the modern Steel Nomad Light.
Aah wait for the next gen.Wait, so Mali is leading against Adreno
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 = N4PASi on an inferior fab node????
I hope Geekerwan tests the Snapdragon X Elite using Liquid Nitrogen, like they did for the M4 iPad.
It seems every single laptop that has been released so far cannot really sustain the peak clockspeeds, within their thermal/power limitations.
I guess the Qualcomm dev kit would be the best platform to check sustained clock speeds. Alas I've not seen any review of that device.It seems every single laptop that has been released so far cannot really sustain the peak clockspeeds, within their thermal/power lilimitations.
ARM got AMD FSR2 and tweaked it to create it's "own" solution ASR.
With traditional LOD methodology, the example package size is 1.8 GB, and now it only takes 557 MB on disk with NanoMesh. This means 70 percent smaller and 70 percent faster for downloading. If we look at the size of pure mesh data, NanoMesh only uses roughly 16 percent of the total storage to achieve the same visual quality.
ARM thread existsNot directly related but still ARM, missed this back in May, seems like I should pay more attention to their various company blogs.....
NanoMesh On Mobile: Delivering Great Beauty In Simplicity
From the GDC24 tech talk “SmartGI Evolution: Adaptive NanoMesh on Mobile”. SmartGI and NanoMesh are cutting-edge rendering solutions aiming to enable the best possible graphics on all platforms.community.arm.com
Qualcomm has their own one in the kitchen:It seems that this tech will become more important and has a solid use case. Most phones are configured in the 1080p range natively, and the strategies that work well for 1440 and 4k don't necessarily give great results at lower resolutions as the base rendering resolution doesn't provide sufficient information for a decent product image. I wonder if there will be a move to get this tech moved to WoA for the Qualcomm laptops...
Yeah, hopefully a800 bootlegs GCN like the rest of the industry did (not like they have much of a choice anyhow).Sebastian Aaltonen's remarka about the Adreno GPU (multiple tweet threads):
Oooof, that's UE5 down for the count.Qualcomm has to go though the same process as Nvidia did back in the day to get competitive in modern compute heavy gaming workloads
Why no choice?Yeah, hopefully a800 bootlegs GCN like the rest of the industry did (not like they have much of a choice anyhow).