Hayabusa Rider
Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,266
- 126
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: kogase
Didn't read the article. It's a waste of time until the validity of his research and prototype have been verified.
Then you missed the part where it said he had 50 independent validation reports...
I have a hundred independent validation reports that says he doesn't.
Let's see MIT or a similar institution perform a rigorous and published trial. If it bears out, then I'll get excited.
100 you say? Please give some links.
Why does MIT or a similar institution have to do it? MIT and other major institutions are politically affiliated and influenced. Personally, I trust independant scientists more than major ones.
I would like to see that guy in the article provide links as well. Can you provide them for me or can you contact him and have them fowarded to this site and post them ? Untill I see a working model that can be prodded, poked, broken down and rebuilt I'll have to pass on believing that guy's claims.
Some people are so naive it's not even funny.
Look at the title of my post. IT ENDS WITH A QUESTION MARK! I'm not drawing conclusions. Other people in this thread are just like the majority of Americans and Scientists in the world. Closed minded and ignore evidence that contradicts what might make them look bad. It's all politics.
What is the evidence? Where is it published? Materials? Methods? Statistical analysis? What IS the evidence. Let's see it! No?
That's the problem. I have no way to know the truth of the matter.