question for the Christians - immortality

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
GOD :

creates man with foreskin
commands him to cut it off

creates food
tempts us with it and commands us not to touch it

creates sin, then creates man with carnal sinful nature
but commands man not to sin

god of love
countless deaths

is powerful enough to create universe
isn't powerful enough to appear in front of me (or anyone else) with ground shaking and fire burning and proving that he's god
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,573
5,096
136
This how we know you are a credulous idiot, beyond even the constant incoherent stream-of-consciousness dribble you typically post.



I do love the way creationists say the earth is only 6K years old and attempt to completely discredit science's determination that the earth is millions of years old.

Yet, when asked to defend the assertion the earth's only 6K years old, they turn to the same science that they disdain and use science, albeit discredited and twisted science, to back up their claims.

To me, if you try to discredit science in determining earth's age or in evolution, you then cannot turn back to science to try to bolster your position. You reject science's findings completely in one aspect.....you reject science in all its aspects. Cannot just pick and choose what you want to believe is real and what is false.




And I ask again, if the earth is truly 6K years old, why does God lie to us with carbon dating and the fossil record?

Cannot be about testing faith......show me where God lied to someone to test his faith? He didn't lie to Abraham when God commanded he sacrifice his son, Isaac, to show his faith, he asked for sacrifice. That's been how God tests faith, not by lying and then hoping you "see" through the lie to show true faith. Never worked that way before.

So, when did God start lying to us? And if He lies in one aspect, how can anyone trust the rest of "His Word" isn't also just lies?
 
Last edited:

AreaCode707

Lifer
Sep 21, 2001
18,440
101
91
assuming Adam and Eve did not eat from the fruit and therefore would live eternally on earth, as would all their offspring... and God's command was to be "fruitful and multiply".

what was God's plan on overpopulation on planet Earth?
would the Earth grow in size? would people start inhabiting other planets?
They were immortal. They spent millions of years tending orchards and doing the maths before they figured out that wasn't what God meant, and by then the missed the chance to teach their kids dinosaur wrangling.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
If god created man, woman and earth; then, applying transitive property, everything man-made is made by god. That means there cannot be an unnatural death on this planet for you religious folk.

Anything made by man is made by man. God did not make cigarettes or atomic bombs, no matter what twisted logic you try to apply to it.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
Anything made by man is made by man. God did not make cigarettes or atomic bombs, no matter what twisted logic you try to apply to it.

Why'd he allow them to happen, then? Why did he allow millions of innocent civilians to die from the atomic bomb retaliations?

Why does god help a football player score a touchdown while ignoring starving kids in Africa?

Why did god create a world so fucked up?

Why does god send people to hell?

Why did god CREATE people just to go to hell?

Why did god, in his infinite wisdom, CREATE sin, create men to have an uncontrollable, unavoidable sinful nature, and then damn them to hell for it?

I am now prepared to listen to your twisted justifications for all of this. You may now reply.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Anything made by man is made by man. God did not make cigarettes or atomic bombs, no matter what twisted logic you try to apply to it.

So... God made man. Man made cigarettes and atomic bombs. So who is responsible for cancer? The cigarettes and bombs can incite it, but it's in the human body which God created and the result of processes in the human body. Even forgetting man-made causes of cancer, it can still happen. Does this mean that God created cancer when creating man (and other species) and that cancer, therefore, is "natural" and therefore would have happened even if humans remained immortal? Like, maybe we'd live forever but have giant bulbous masses all over our bodies?
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
So... God made man. Man made cigarettes and atomic bombs. So who is responsible for cancer? The cigarettes and bombs can incite it, but it's in the human body which God created and the result of processes in the human body. Even forgetting man-made causes of cancer, it can still happen. Does this mean that God created cancer when creating man (and other species) and that cancer, therefore, is "natural" and therefore would have happened even if humans remained immortal? Like, maybe we'd live forever but have giant bulbous masses all over our bodies?

You have no basis of information to determine any mutations would occur. Being immortal also does not imply you can't die, which is why I asked why the OP thought we weren't still immortal beings.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
You have no basis of information to determine any mutations would occur.

I see; so your contention is that it is possible that mutations would never have happened during reproduction if not for the shit that went down in the garden of eden, and that our original genomes were so perfect that, in eden, they would never have "gone rogue" and started forming cancer?

I assume this also implies that evolution would no longer occur in any other creature or lifeform on earth in this scenario? Otherwise there would be the eventual possibility of a retrovirus which would then taint the perfect, mutation-free, perfectly reproducing human body.
 
Jul 10, 2007
12,050
3
0
Why'd he allow them to happen, then? Why did he allow millions of innocent civilians to die from the atomic bomb retaliations?

Why does god help a football player score a touchdown while ignoring starving kids in Africa?

Why did god create a world so fucked up?

Why does god send people to hell?

Why did god CREATE people just to go to hell?

Why did god, in his infinite wisdom, CREATE sin, create men to have an uncontrollable, unavoidable sinful nature, and then damn them to hell for it?

I am now prepared to listen to your twisted justifications for all of this. You may now reply.

Because he's God and can do whatever he wants.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
I see; so your contention is that it is possible that mutations would never have happened during reproduction if not for the shit that went down in the garden of eden, and that our original genomes were so perfect that, in eden, they would never have "gone rogue" and started forming cancer?

I assume this also implies that evolution would no longer occur in any other creature or lifeform on earth in this scenario? Otherwise there would be the eventual possibility of a retrovirus which would then taint the perfect, mutation-free, perfectly reproducing human body.

He's ignoring the fact that Adam and Eve were created with a sinful nature.
 

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
<snip>
is powerful enough to create universe
isn't powerful enough to appear in front of me (or anyone else) with ground shaking and fire burning and proving that he's god

Big difference between "doesn't" and "can't"

Example: Most parents don't strangle their infant children. That does not mean that they can't.

Are you really that narcissistic that you think that if god exists that he would bend to your will to have him prove himself?
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Are you really that narcissistic that you think that if god exists that he would bend to your will to have him prove himself?

Agreed; Any "god" that is willing to condemn all humans for all of eternity to being mortals for something one human being did {thousands/millions} of years ago and thereby subject all generations to mutations and the like clearly lacks ethics and doesn't care about any human beings enough to actually interact with them.
 

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
I see; so your contention is that it is possible that mutations would never have happened during reproduction if not for the shit that went down in the garden of eden, and that our original genomes were so perfect that, in eden, they would never have "gone rogue" and started forming cancer?

I assume this also implies that evolution would no longer occur in any other creature or lifeform on earth in this scenario? Otherwise there would be the eventual possibility of a retrovirus which would then taint the perfect, mutation-free, perfectly reproducing human body.

No, he's saying that you are applying current rules to a different situation. The world where the Garden of Eden exists is essentially a competely different world than that in which we live today. Completely different. As in nothing the same. Nothing. Not the same in any regard. Different on every level. Changed in every respect that you can imagine. Why is this such a difficult concept to grasp? How many times does this have to be said for it to get through people's thick skulls?

Just because mutations would happen IN TODAY'S WORLD does not mean it would happen in the given scenario. In all liklihood, given the nature of what the Garden of Eden was supposed to be, mutations would have never happened. Diseases would have never happened. Evolution would have never happened (as evolution was need-based, which nothing was ever needed in Eden, as it was provided).

What I thought was a fun and interesting hypothetical topic turned into fruitless effort to push through a simple concept into some incredibly thick skulls. I weep for the future.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
Big difference between "doesn't" and "can't"

Example: Most parents don't strangle their infant children. That does not mean that they can't.

Are you really that narcissistic that you think that if god exists that he would bend to your will to have him prove himself?

The "god" described in the bible cares for nothing more than the love of his children. That puts my "wants" close to the top of "His" list. Next, if he's all knowing and all powerful and exists outside of space and time, why CAN'T he just appear to me, right the fuck in front of me, shake my hand, say "Hello, Nik, my son, my precious creation, whom I know better than you know yourself" and have a discussion with me?

Why can't I stand toe to toe with an all-powerful all-loving god and scream my broken hearted bullshit in his face, cry, and have him compassionately accept and forgive me?

Why won't he?

Because he doesn't exist.
 

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
Agreed; Any "god" that is willing to condemn all humans for all of eternity to being mortals for something one human being did {thousands/millions} of years ago and thereby subject all generations to mutations and the like clearly lacks ethics and doesn't care about any human beings enough to actually interact with them.

So the answer is yes, you are THAT narcissistic to think that if an omnipotent, omniscient being exists, that you deserve him to pay special attention to you.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
So the answer is yes, you are THAT narcissistic to think that if an omnipotent, omniscient being exists, that you deserve him to pay special attention to you.

You know, mentioning it once is one thing. However, I'm quickly coming to the conclusion that you only recently learned that word and are trying to inject it into any conversation where it MIGHT fit.

Stop it.
 

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
The "god" described in the bible cares for nothing more than the love of his children. That puts my "wants" close to the top of "His" list. Next, if he's all knowing and all powerful and exists outside of space and time, why CAN'T he just appear to me, right the fuck in front of me, shake my hand, say "Hello, Nik, my son, my precious creation, whom I know better than you know yourself" and have a discussion with me?

Why can't I stand toe to toe with an all-powerful all-loving god and scream my broken hearted bullshit in his face, cry, and have him compassionately accept and forgive me?

Why won't he?

Because he doesn't exist.

So your proof that god doesn't exist is because he doesn't show him/herself to you and provide absolute miracles to prove he's god?

Yeah, you are a quite full of yourself if you think that if god exists he'd bend to what you want.
 

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
You know, mentioning it once is one thing. However, I'm quickly coming to the conclusion that you only recently learned that word and are trying to inject it into any conversation where it MIGHT fit.

Stop it.

This is hardly a situation where it "might" fit.

You know what they say: If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

EDIT: If you were God, would you bother revealing yourself to some dipshit who sits around demanding your presence? No, you wouldn't. You'd tell him to fuck off, you are the one running the show.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
No, he's saying that you are applying current rules to a different situation. The world where the Garden of Eden exists is essentially a competely different world than that in which we live today. Completely different. As in nothing the same. Nothing. Not the same in any regard. Different on every level. Changed in every respect that you can imagine. Why is this such a difficult concept to grasp? How many times does this have to be said for it to get through people's thick skulls?

Just because mutations would happen IN TODAY'S WORLD does not mean it would happen in the given scenario. In all liklihood, given the nature of what the Garden of Eden was supposed to be, mutations would have never happened. Diseases would have never happened. Evolution would have never happened (as evolution was need-based, which nothing was ever needed in Eden, as it was provided).

What I thought was a fun and interesting hypothetical topic turned into fruitless effort to push through a simple concept into some incredibly thick skulls. I weep for the future.

The problem you are having, and which is interfering with your thick skull's ability to comprehend this topic, is that the foundations of biology assume and require certain things. I agree that we don't know how much mankind would actually have reproduced regardless of the "be fruitful and multiply" directive. What I don't understand is how we can live in a world where humans, trees, snakes, soil, oceans, etc. all existed at some point in a perfect state that involved no evolution, bacteria, aging, etc.

So here are these two dudes/dudettes, a snake, and an apple tree. One of them decides to screw over humankind. Then, poof, God (who is love) decides to instigate mutations and evolution, create viruses out of thin air (since there was no primeval formation of DNA/RNA), and a bunch of other tragic bullshit all in response. Is that the concept here?
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
So your proof that god doesn't exist is because he doesn't show him/herself to you and provide absolute miracles to prove he's god?

Yeah, you are a quite full of yourself if you think that if god exists he'd bend to what you want.

If.

He doesn't, so it doesn't matter.
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,125
2
56
So here are these two dudes, a snake, and an apple tree. One of them decides to screw over humankind. Then, poof, God (who is love) decides to instigate mutations and evolution, create viruses out of thin air (since there was no primeval formation of DNA/RNA), and a bunch of other tragic bullshit all in response. Is that the concept here?

Why did god, who is love, invent sin and hell and create humans with the capacity to fail? Why did he create man with the intention of sending him to hell?

Does that sound like a god of love to you?
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
If you were God, would you bother revealing yourself to some dipshit who sits around demanding your presence? No, you wouldn't. You'd tell him to fuck off, you are the one running the show.
So going to church, proselytizing, spreading the word of God and other such actions are completely meaningless. If he doesn't care what we do as individuals, why would he care about what we do as a group? The way the Bible describes him indicates that he DOES care about what individuals do (that's the whole basis of acceptance into Heaven in the afterlife), so his inattentiveness on an individual level is simply willful callousness, which is hardly what I look for in a supreme being... So he either doesn't care, in which case why live by the principles set forth in the Bible at all, or he is intentionally avoiding us, in which case why would he want to spend time with us after we die?

Nothing about your argument adds up...
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |