Long before he began to project that he was told that about himself, that he's worthless and without character. What is telling is that in fact he is miserable. The damage is done and only he can undo it.
Long before he began to project that he was told that about himself, that he's worthless and without character. What is telling is that in fact he is miserable. The damage is done and only he can undo it.The projection here is really hard core.
It is very telling that you think other people would only think multiple felonies committed to win an election should have consequences out of partisanship. Sad to see you have such a diseased view of the world.
Again if you want to argue that lying about campaign expenditures is worse than lying under oath to a grand jury (about the same subject mind you) then be my guest.
Vs. lying under oath to a grand jury, you say toe-may-toe and I say toe-mah-toe. It's lying about sex, the pearl clutching about "well it was BEFORE the election" is completely insincere.
Which is why my initial response directly spoke to the possibility (if not probability) there would be more to come which would make a stronger case for impeachment than currently exists. Considering the rate at which Trump says stupid things the projected timeframe for him saying something which is unequivocably impeachable is probably a few months but could be weeks or even days seeing how clueless the man is. With what we know *now* the consistent and correct answer is a Congressional censure. The better answer would have been for both Clinton and Trump to resign but Clinton already set that precedent of not resigning with the enthusiastic support of Democrats.
I forget so maybe you would help me. What was the timeframe where Clinton illegally paid money to subvert an election?
Oh, he didn't. Thanks.
Clinton did one thing that cost him, lie to the government about him having sex with Monica. It was enough to get him impeached. Yes the Dems stood by him for what was an impeachable offense.
Now we have a person who is lied and criminally conspired to influence an election in his favor. Perhaps you think Clinton getting a pass means Trump should because there was sex involved. I don't. I think Trump should pay the penalty for the attempted manipulation for the Office of the President of the United States, with a margin close enough that his opponent won the popular vote but won the EC. Would knowing the truth have cost him the election? We'll never know because we were all deceived by his illegal actions.
For all Clinton was factually found to have done wrong, he didn't win with the aid of intentional election fraud of his own doing.
If we removed the party labels and decided proper justice with no knowledge of the defendant you'd likely be arguing vehemently against the very position you're taking. Hell your side who spent Clinton's 1992 election effort defending him against sexual misconduct charges. And if you want to use the "well he did so to get fraudulently elected" then so did Clinton as his grand jury lie under oath was in 1994, thus influencing the course of his 1996 election. But spin away on that one too and imagine reasons why that's somehow different and what Trump did was a trillion times worse.
I suppose the one thing that's not surprising in all this is that your side is still choosing to defend Clinton over the women even after all this time however, I guess they're just the acceptable collateral damage of keeping a Democratic president in power. Maybe one day the "Me Too" movement might even make you reconsider throwing your support behind sexual predators just because you expect some political gain from it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html
I have changed my vote from "impeachment" to "crucifiction"
no fair! you can do that?
Revelation 19:20
The false prophet of the end times is described in Revelation 13:11-15. He is also referred to as the “second beast” (Revelation 16:13, 19:20, 20:10). Together with the Antichrist and Satan, who empowers both of them, the false prophet is the third party in the unholy trinity.
His name is Donald Trump
I thought it was the Muslim black guy with the forged birth certificate?
Yeah wait, whatever happened with that? It was somewhere around 15% of evangelicals were SURE Obama was the antichrist and about another 15% were concerned he was. Did they change their minds?
I believe that is usually done on a table, no?So "drawn and quartered" is off the table?
I believe that is usually done on a table, no?
I thought it was the Muslim black guy with the forged birth certificate?
Right, but, part of it happens .... "on a table. Still alive, the victim was cut open in the abdomen and his intestines and sex organs removed"No, being drawn and quartered is traditionally done in a street at a crossroads.
Right, but, part of it happens .... "on a table. Still alive, the victim was cut open in the abdomen and his intestines and sex organs removed"
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanged,_drawn_and_quartered
Yeah wait, whatever happened with that? It was somewhere around 15% of evangelicals were SURE Obama was the antichrist and about another 15% were concerned he was. Did they change their minds?
What he did was far more direct actually if you remember the history of it.
In 1996 Chinese Intelligence Agents paid for Clinton's legal defense, and campaign, and offered direct money for influence in the WH, as well as agreeing to aid in future DNC media campaigns--which they all confessed openly before Congress (Confessions here). The FBI began investigating, not over "collusion" (no one was dumb enough back then to believe you could Collude.)--but due to campaign finance.
Reno then removed the FBI's normal DOJ liason leading the investigation under orders of Bill Clinton (Rahm Emanuel was openly saying he was telling Reno what to do for Clinton)-why? Because the FBI agent was questioning people in the Clinton Campaign, and Ms Ingersoll (The DoJ lawyer) was allowing it to spread too much. So Reno appointed someone hand picked by her and Bill Clinton. Charles La Belle, specifically to kill the case.
One problem. Labelle found so much dirty money, and literally video evidence of Gore and Clinton fund raising illegally ( the tapes were shown to the public at one point), that La Belle had no choice but to file a 17 page report stated unequivocally the Clintons had brazenly and wantonly violated campaign finance law, and that special counsel was needed due to the overwhelming interference by the WH, the Director of the FBI also said this. (Page 1376)
''It is difficult to imagine a more compelling situation for appointing an independent counsel,'' the Director, Louis J. Freeh
Reno's response? Lol. No.
"I am trying to follow the independent counsel statute as it has been framed by Congress," she said. "If you had a lower threshold, then any time somebody said 'boo' about a covered person, you'd trigger the independent counsel statute.
Reno closed down the investigation without prosecuting anyone in the WH, or even questioning anyone. The evidence was so overwhelming, that just a couple months of Congressional investigations found millions...MILLIONS in illegal fund raising, from foreign accounts, and payments to advertisers, and other entities.
If he had done anything remotely that bad, yes. Right now it looks like the reasons for the special council are nothing and nothing they have found so far has made it seem like Trump did anything illegal with the Russia thing(incoming wave of OMG TDS). List a crime related to Russia that anyone has been convicted of breaking in this investigation.
What the investigation has shown is that Clinton gave China access to her server, likely leading to many agent deaths and that she paid for the dossier and that she took many millions from foreign governments, likely breaking the same laws? that Trump is accused of (collusion isn't illegal, not that he did that). Keep calling names and bringing up the same old divisive arguments though.
I have no clue if Trump will be considered a good President (30 years from now) and I'm not sure if his policies are going to lead to anything other than a good economy. What I do know is that we will all find that out in the next 6 months.
If he had done anything remotely that bad, yes. Right now it looks like the reasons for the special council are nothing and nothing they have found so far has made it seem like Trump did anything illegal with the Russia thing(incoming wave of OMG TDS). List a crime related to Russia that anyone has been convicted of breaking in this investigation. What the investigation has shown is that Clinton gave China access to her server, likely leading to many agent deaths and that she paid for the dossier and that she took many millions from foreign governments, likely breaking the same laws? that Trump is accused of (collusion isn't illegal, not that he did that). Keep calling names and bringing up the same old divisive arguments though.
I have no clue if Trump will be considered a good President (30 years from now) and I'm not sure if his policies are going to lead to anything other than a good economy. What I do know is that we will all find that out in the next 6 months.
Well that escalated rapidly...Right, but, part of it happens .... "on a table. Still alive, the victim was cut open in the abdomen and his intestines and sex organs removed"
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanged,_drawn_and_quartered
Go ahead and write your congressmen then. There is a GOP president, house, and senate. They could completely go ahead and destroy the democratic party with this information especially after as you stated just 2 months of congressional investigations found "MILLIONS in illegal fund raising, from foreign accounts, and payments to advertisers, and other entities". What congressman or reporter or attorney general or journalist or people aspiring to any of these positions doesn't want to make a name for himself by destroying the opposing party by clearly standing for good and justice, this imprinting their name in the history books for eternity?The evidence was so overwhelming, that just a couple months of Congressional investigations found millions...MILLIONS in illegal fund raising, from foreign accounts, and payments to advertisers, and other entities.