R260/270/280/290/290x Review thread

Page 32 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
But it is, lets just take a look at Hardwarecanucks vs Anandtech.

Even while hardwarecanucks is still not perfect. It already shows the 290X losing 10-15% performance.

Maybe you did not notice the 7970 and R280X results? Its much lower on HWC for what reason? Mayhaps its a system setup, drivers.. or possibly.. ingame settings?
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,058
410
126

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
Maybe you did not notice the 7970 and R280X results? Its much lower on HWC for what reason? Mayhaps its a system setup, drivers.. or possibly.. ingame settings?

Or different drivers. Anandtech uses 2 different catalyst.
 
Last edited:

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
5 months?

Probably the same ones that put warranty void if removed stickers on their cooler but still take the RMA.

Or the ones who will not accept a video card with a different cooler on it such as a water block, but will take it after you say this if you put the stock cooler back on it.

So I would say, so long as you can reflash the stock bios back, every company that isn't terrible to start with will honor your warranty if you flash the bios.

No, don't try that. There are companies who specifically state they will honor their warranty as long as you return the card with the original cooler. "Probably" doesn't cut it. Just like 6-8 months is supposed to be the same as 5 months. 6-8 months ago you would have had to have bought Titan at $1000 for this type of performance. Which is exactly what I said. Just like you never counted the cost of water cooling when you were bragging about all the perf/$ your 470's offered. Posting FUD after FUD doesn't make your arguments correct. You're just typing one BS post after the other.

Also, in case you didn't notice, you are preaching to the choir about the ineffectiveness of the 290X's cooler. There isn't anyone here defending it. Everyone is waiting for the aftermarket cooled versions. Just like they would have even if AMD put an engineering masterpiece on it like nVidia did with Titan. In the end the only way nVidia sells the Titan cooler is by locking out the AIBs from releasing their own designs.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Anandtech uses a factory OC aftermarket 280X. Thats why.

The 7970GE just doesnt make sense.

Because its different setups.. i thought one should realize by now, comparing benches across multiple review sites yield +/- deltas.

As to the card itself, no doubt, the reference card is le-suck. Cannot justify it at all for anyone not going on water.

As its been said, after market coolers that keep this card in the 80C range, would allow for full-time 1ghz boost. If it already beats Titan with ~850mhz..

As it is, it's a good prelude for whats to come with all the AIBs great cooling designs. Would definitely not buy AMD reference again, ever. Their blower coolers... blow.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
We still have to see if an aftermarket can keep it cool without water. The 7990 is also notorious known for its overheating.

But so far, the 290X is nothing but a benchmark card that cant keep up performance in prolonged gaming.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
Also, in case you didn't notice, you are preaching to the choir about the ineffectiveness of the 290X's cooler. There isn't anyone here defending it. Everyone is waiting for the aftermarket cooled versions.

So the question is, AMD obviously knew their coolers stunk hard.. they even made some BS about "95C is safe"..

WHY? Why not folk out $10 extra on BOM for a better cooling design?

Either a) their margins are horrible as is (unlikely!) OR b) don't care, cos they see massive sales from AIB designs and not reference (as is the case for many generations)..
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Its a fast card, there's no doubt, but given what's happening it is clear AMD is lacking confidence. Not in their ability to produce a competitive card, but rather their ability to sell it. This is the only reason to gimp your own product to this extent, in the name of cost cutting.

Tahiti was a more robust design than GK104. I'm sure it was also more expensive to produce. Where did that get AMD? At least AMD didn't gimp the card itself and have to resort to locking down the voltage and threaten to drop warranty support for the GPU's if voltage control was enabled. But they did take a page out of nVidia's book and reduce the cost of the card and undercut their competitor's price and increased performance.

It's just the reference cooler. I keep saying it, but Titan's cooler is not a high demand item.
 

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,726
1,342
136


Even the Uber mode starts to throttle badly. It cant even keep its baseclocks! This is a (short) benchmark only card. Outside that its performance dissolves.

I agree that the 290X needs a better cooler, but that graph is misleading. The spike at the end of the uber mode graph is explained in the article as the reviewer blocking the fan with his hand to see how powertune reacted. That's why you don't see the nice curve one would expect at the end of the graph.
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
No, don't try that. There are companies who specifically state they will honor their warranty as long as you return the card with the original cooler. "Probably" doesn't cut it. Just like 6-8 months is supposed to be the same as 5 months. 6-8 months ago you would have had to have bought Titan at $1000 for this type of performance. Which is exactly what I said. Just like you never counted the cost of water cooling when you were bragging about all the perf/$ your 470's offered. Posting FUD after FUD doesn't make your arguments correct. You're just typing one BS post after the other.

Also, in case you didn't notice, you are preaching to the choir about the ineffectiveness of the 290X's cooler. There isn't anyone here defending it. Everyone is waiting for the aftermarket cooled versions. Just like they would have even if AMD put an engineering masterpiece on it like nVidia did with Titan. In the end the only way nVidia sells the Titan cooler is by locking out the AIBs from releasing their own designs.

I didn't care enough to double check the exact date and figure out the exact duration down to the exact second which we both know would be the only possible way to satisfy you.

Well I haven't seen a single company state they wouldn't honor their warranty with the original bios on the card, nor anything that says flashing voids the warranty since most if not all offer programs on their websites to flash the bios.

I always counted out the cost of my water cooling parts to include the cost of my cards. Don't make things up, you didn't suddenly become smarter than everyone else, it was brought up at the time and the cost was still below the 550-600 cost of the 7970.

Seems you're the one posting fud to back your fud up :\

Obviously there is more to it otherwise you wouldn't be acting the way you are.

Balls in your court though, should be pretty easy for you to find the vendors that void warranty for bios flashing, most of them have special flashing programs on their websites.
 
Last edited:

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
So the question is, AMD obviously knew their coolers stunk hard.. they even made some BS about "95C is safe"..

WHY? Why not folk out $10 extra on BOM for a better cooling design?

Either a) their margins are horrible as is (unlikely!) OR b) don't care, cos they see massive sales from AIB designs and not reference (as is the case for many generations)..

Well, we don't know that 95° safe is BS. I also think that designing a hotcrap reference cooler like Titan's adds more than $10 to the BOM (You have to take the cost of engineering into account.). I've already posted that my view is the latter, they just figured it wasn't worth it because everyone wants the AIB custom designs anyway.
 

psolord

Platinum Member
Sep 16, 2009
2,015
1,225
136
If the OP wants, he can add these to the op. No point of them being lost inside pages and pages of posts.

AMD Radeon R9 290X reviews

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/10/23/amd_radeon_r9_290x_video_card_review/16#.UmifAel3tsc

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review

http://www.hardware.fr/articles/910-1/amd-radeon-r9-290x-test-hawaii-sors-ses-watts.html

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_r9_290x_review_benchmarks,1.html

http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/2013/amd-radeon-r9-290x-im-test/

http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-radeon-r9-290x-video-card-review_126806

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290x-hawaii-review,3650.html

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Radeon-R9-290X-Hawaii-Review-Taking-TITANs

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...iews/63742-amd-radeon-r9-290x-4gb-review.html

http://www.techspot.com/review/727-radeon-r9-290x/

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Gefor...-257241/Tests/Radeon-R9-290X-im-Test-1093796/

http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/5823/amd-radeon-r9-290x-4gb-reference-video-card-review/index.html

http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/amd-r9-290x-review-part-1/

http://techreport.com/review/25509/amd-radeon-r9-290x-graphics-card-reviewed

http://www.hardwareheaven.com/revie...9-290x-graphics-card-review-introduction.html

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_290X/


crossfire

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...deon-R9-290X-CrossFire-and-4K-Preview-Testing (preview)

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_r9_290x_crossfire_vs_sli_review_benchmarks,1.html

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_290X_CrossFire/
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Because 3DVagabond says so, nobody wants reference.

Well I guess that is half right, nobody wants AMD 290X reference that is pretty clear at this point.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Not all of them.

I actually went reference because all but one was purchased used, and the easiest example of people wanting reference, is the used market.

Many cards are reference on the used market, more than aftermarket in fact.

Kind of goes against the ideology that because the 290X reference cooler is pretty bad now "nobody wants reference".
 

Imouto

Golden Member
Jul 6, 2011
1,241
2
81
Because 3DVagabond says so, nobody wants reference.

Well I guess that is half right, nobody wants AMD 290X reference that is pretty clear at this point.

Happens with the GTX 780. Happens with the 290X. Would happen with the GTX Titan if allowed.

When aftermarket coolers start to pop in the complaint will change to...

I can't wait to know.
 
Last edited:

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
Not all of them.

I actually went reference because all but one was purchased used, and the easiest example of people wanting reference, is the used market.

Many cards are reference on the used market, more than aftermarket in fact.

Kind of goes against the ideology that because the 290X reference cooler is pretty bad now "nobody wants reference".

Sure some people will want reference for different reasons.

People not planning on overclocking and that just want great performance out of the box, the R9 290X delivers while saving some money. It has more memory than the 780 and it has more horsepower for higher resolutions, with higher bandwidth and ROPs.

People wanting to WC them.

And was it a case of people wanting reference or a case of reference cards being offered the most and/or cheapest?
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Sure some people will want reference for different reasons.

People not planning on overclocking and that just want great performance out of the box, the R9 290X delivers while saving some money. It has more memory than the 780 and it has more horsepower for higher resolutions, with higher bandwidth and ROPs.

People wanting to WC them.

Yes generally reference is good for water coolers because it is normally a long wait for non reference blocks, and it's generally limited to only a few non reference models.

There are also people who don't like the case heat dump, or prefer the sleek look of reference. People who are form factor limited as well as people who go MGPU.

There are lots of people who go reference for many reasons, making the statement that nobody wants reference is just pure fud.

And was it a case of people wanting reference or a case of reference cards being offered the most and/or cheapest?

Could be this too, like I said reference is fairly popular for many reasons.


Next ask me why I didn't go reference with my 7950s
 
Last edited:

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,601
2
81
But it is, lets just take a look at Hardwarecanucks vs Anandtech.




Even while hardwarecanucks is still not perfect. It already shows the 290X losing 10-15% performance.

I see virtually the same performance at HWC and less than 10% difference at AT in the benchmarks you posted. That is not 30%.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
That's not what I asked. I asked when was the last time you used reference cooling. Not even a good effort on your part. Stooping pretty low to try and sneak that through. You were busted on the very next post.

I love your nitpicking.

http://alienbabeltech.com/abt/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=28818

March 04, 2013 was the last time I used reference cooling.

I had been using reference for awhile at that point. I was using it to beat up on BoFox'es 5870, why don't you ask him about it? :awe:
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,573
5,096
136
Well, now we may be able to really see the answer to this thread:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2348743

Or, better known by its title. "Get to know Viral Marketers through Hardware History," except it isn't by hardware buying history but by the insane FUD flowing throughout this thread.

"43dB will cause hearing damage."
(No it won't, even long term. And since a gpu's fan creates steady state sound vs. impulse sound, it's much easier for the ear to compensate. Steady state sound is sound that is constant, like a lawn mower or fan spinning. Impulse sound is like a gun shot or explosion. The human ear, or more specifically, the cilia in the cochlea, can much easier deal with steady state sound by "laying down" to reduce the effects of increased sound levels presented to them, something they can't do with impulse noise. The ringing in the ears that people have after exposure to steady state noise, say after going to a rock concert, is from the cilia attempting to "stand" back up. But it takes much higher levels of sound pressure over long term exposure to even elicit any sort of hearing impairment, such as ringing in the ears, much less long term damage.)

"3dB is twice as loud..."
(No, it's not. 3dB is generally accepted as the smallest increase in sound pressure/intensity that humans can perceive. It takes a 10dB increase in sound pressure/intensity for humans to perceive a doubling in "loudness.")

"engineering trainwreck"
No, only the cooler is not great, but at the price point AMD hit with this card, it's darned acceptable. The engineering that went actually into the card is damned impressive.

Sheesh. The FUD and damage control is outa control in here. And I'm currently running a GTX 780 in the computer I'm using as I type this, so certainly no AMD acolyte .... nor am I an Nvidiot.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |