R260/270/280/290/290x Review thread

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,227
36
91
A refresh two years later is not going to open my wallet......290 is where the meat is at.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
From looking at the 280X reviews I haven't been impressed with their overclocks (XFX and ASUS). I know the XFX is voltage locked and the Asus is not, but it would think one the Asus would be capable of hitting 1200Mhz. Maybe this is why AMD chose to go with a lower boost frequency on the 280X? Maybe most of the chips they are using and just not up to par with the 7970 chips? Who knows.. I guess we will have to wait...

From Hardware Canucks -

With more time and access to the necessary tools, this will likely be improved but judging by our conversations with board partners, the R9 280X hasn’t been a great overclocker for their teams either. That doesn’t bode well for enthusiasts but only quality time in the hands of the public will tell if these initial impressions are correct.
 
Last edited:

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I really hope the 290 overclocks well. I think it will be the star on this release. Matches 780 performance for under $500 and overclocks well, it will do good I think.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
I really hope the 290 overclocks well. I think it will be the star on this release. Matches 780 performance for under $500 and overclocks well, it will do good I think.

Me too! Per the rumors it looks like it comes with a boost clock of 1Ghz, so I wouldn't expect + 300-350Mhz average overclocks on the core like the reference 7950. I hope I am wrong though
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
From looking at the 280X reviews I haven't been impressed with their overclocks (XFX and ASUS). I know the XFX is voltage locked and the Asus is not, but it would think one the Asus would be capable of hitting 1200Mhz. Maybe this is why AMD chose to go with a lower boost frequency on the 280X? Maybe most of the chips they are using and just not up to par with the 7970 chips? Who knows.. I guess we will have to wait...

From Hardware Canucks -

With more time and access to the necessary tools, this will likely be improved but judging by our conversations with board partners, the R9 280X hasn’t been a great overclocker for their teams either. That doesn’t bode well for enthusiasts but only quality time in the hands of the public will tell if these initial impressions are correct.

From hardwarehaven-
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/revie...card-review-power-temps-and-overclocking.html

We found our 280X DirectCU 2 Top hit a maximum overclock of 1250/1650


So at least one did hit 1200.

Although if these cards are consuming less power, they might not overclock as high.
 
Last edited:

SlickR12345

Senior member
Jan 9, 2010
542
44
91
www.clubvalenciacf.com
I'm really disapointed and I don't get it why other people aren't as disapointed as I am. I mean what this is, is basically the same graphic cards from two years ago at 10% to 20% cheaper prices and with new names. I mean big deal, two years and no performance increases.

The middle of the range is still nowhere near the top of the line 7970GE is, in the past the new generation middle card selling for about $200 will have the same performance as the previous generation top of the line card that sold for $400/500.

Now the middle of the range card has the same performance that the last generation middle of the range card had at about $20 to $30 dollard cheaper, this is pretty much almost a fraud.

The new GPU's from AMD are a farce, just absolute crap, repackaged as something new. Its pretty much the same price and same performance as two years old cards.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
I'm really disapointed and I don't get it why other people aren't as disapointed as I am. I mean what this is, is basically the same graphic cards from two years ago at 10% to 20% cheaper prices and with new names. I mean big deal, two years and no performance increases.

The middle of the range is still nowhere near the top of the line 7970GE is, in the past the new generation middle card selling for about $200 will have the same performance as the previous generation top of the line card that sold for $400/500.

Now the middle of the range card has the same performance that the last generation middle of the range card had at about $20 to $30 dollard cheaper, this is pretty much almost a fraud.

The new GPU's from AMD are a farce, just absolute crap, repackaged as something new. Its pretty much the same price and same performance as two years old cards.

You do know the R9 290 and R9 290X haven't been released yet right? It's the only new GPU this series and same goes for the GTX 700 series.
 

LegSWAT

Member
Jul 8, 2013
75
0
0
I'm really disapointed and I don't get it why other people aren't as disapointed as I am. I mean what this is, is basically the same graphic cards from two years ago at 10% to 20% cheaper prices and with new names. I mean big deal, two years and no performance increases.

The middle of the range is still nowhere near the top of the line 7970GE is, in the past the new generation middle card selling for about $200 will have the same performance as the previous generation top of the line card that sold for $400/500.

Now the middle of the range card has the same performance that the last generation middle of the range card had at about $20 to $30 dollard cheaper, this is pretty much almost a fraud.

Welcome to rebrand land! GPU-designers, OEMs and customers worldwide are happy about it. (I'm not, btw.)
The new GPU's from AMD are a farce, just absolute crap, repackaged as something new. Its pretty much the same price and same performance as two years old cards.
I wouldn't call Hawaii a farce but the R-rest a pity.
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
I'm really disapointed and I don't get it why other people aren't as disapointed as I am. I mean what this is, is basically the same graphic cards from two years ago at 10% to 20% cheaper prices and with new names. I mean big deal, two years and no performance increases.

The middle of the range is still nowhere near the top of the line 7970GE is, in the past the new generation middle card selling for about $200 will have the same performance as the previous generation top of the line card that sold for $400/500.

Now the middle of the range card has the same performance that the last generation middle of the range card had at about $20 to $30 dollard cheaper, this is pretty much almost a fraud.

The new GPU's from AMD are a farce, just absolute crap, repackaged as something new. Its pretty much the same price and same performance as two years old cards.

Well just go buy a 770 and pay 100usd or 30% more for same performance. Its a free country.

"Based on the real world gameplay experience, the ASUS R9 280X DC2T is a massive value. For a price that is only $10 more than a "reference" Radeon R9 280X (Available on October 11th.) we get the same performance as the GeForce GTX 770 that is $90 more expensive. In fact, in some cases, the ASUS R9 280X DC2T was even faster than the GTX 770"
Hardocp

"Owing to Asus’s over-the-top design it’s absurdly quiet under load while delivering performance 7% better than a stock clocked R9 280X, and in fact is powerful enough to edge out a GTX 770. And did we mention it’s $309?"
Anandtech
 
Last edited:

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
I guess the rebadge is a nice way of getting new positive reviews based on price/performance for an old product.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I guess the rebadge is a nice way of getting new positive reviews based on price/performance for an old product.

Except, in this case, the price isn't different. If the 280x was cheaper than the 7970, it would be great, but it isn't.

At least the 770 came as basically a 680 rebadge, but was $100 cheaper.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Except, in this case, the price isn't different. If the 280x was cheaper than the 7970, it would be great, but it isn't.

At least the 770 came as basically a 680 rebadge, but was $100 cheaper.

So, the 770 @ $400 is good value because the 680 was more expensive, but the 280X is poor value because the 7970 was already better value than the 680? The logic escapes me. :\
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
So, the 770 @ $400 is good value because the 680 was more expensive, but the 280X is poor value because the 7970 was already better value than the 680? The logic escapes me. :\

At release, the 770 was a good value in the $400 price point. It offered previously $500 performance for a $400 price.

The 280x offers $300 performance for a $300 price point. It isn't a bad card, but it doesn't have the value that should be associated with a rebadge. It should be cheaper than the card it is rebranding. Another issue is the 7970 is a good value already, so the 280X has to be a better value (which it isn't).
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
At release, the 770 was a good value in the $400 price point. It offered previously $500 performance for a $400 price.

The 280x offers $300 performance for a $300 price point. It isn't a bad card, but it doesn't have the value that should be associated with a rebadge. It should be cheaper than the card it is rebranding. Another issue is the 7970 is a good value already, so the 280X has to be a better value (which it isn't).

The 280X competes with the 770, not the 7970. This just shows how poor of a value the 680 was before the 770 and how poor of a value the 770 is now.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
At release, the 770 was a good value in the $400 price point. It offered previously $500 performance for a $400 price.

The 280x offers $300 performance for a $300 price point. It isn't a bad card, but it doesn't have the value that should be associated with a rebadge. It should be cheaper than the card it is rebranding. Another issue is the 7970 is a good value already, so the 280X has to be a better value (which it isn't).

One quick point - The 300$ 7970GE only happened within the past two weeks, it is a recent development to clear out inventory for the newer R200 SKUs. Prior to the GPU14 event, I regularly saw 7970GEs for their 400$+ pricepoint continually on newegg *and amazon. Only recently did *all* of them go down to 300$, it is simply to clear inventory. Basically, the 7970GE is on par with the 280X pricepoint but I would imagine the 7970GE is an EOL product.

In terms of performance you get for the buck, the 280X is just better than the GTX 770, period. Hopefully nvidia will lower the 770 price a tad to better solidify the value proposition - when the 770 was initially released, it was a great value proposition. Now? Not so much. If it were adjusted down to 350$, it becomes a great value once again, IMHO. It comes with a free game and offers a heck of a lot of performance - which would be fantastic for a 350$ pricepoint. At a 100$ price premium over the 280X, I think that is a bit much.

The bottom line is the performance you get for the dollar, and right now the 280X is just better than the 770. I would like that to change, I want the 770 to be better positioned against it. Don't you? The main qualm I have with the 280X is that it isn't exactly a performance progression, but that isn't a big deal considering most 280X cards are clocked higher than 7970GE speeds anyway and have an attractive price. The other qualm is whether the 280X comes with Never Settle. If they do not, I would chalk that up as another negative against it - but not in terms of value which remains high.
 
Last edited:

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
Except, in this case, the price isn't different. If the 280x was cheaper than the 7970, it would be great, but it isn't.

At least the 770 came as basically a 680 rebadge, but was $100 cheaper.

It is different from the 7970 release price or from the price from the GTX680 release.

if it is true people that go shop for PC parts only read launch reviews, getting a rebadge reviewed at a later date, with more competitive prices, driver performance improved resulting on better benches and a "newer" release date, will might make it more attractive for that type of consumers.

For consumers that keep on par with tech, these rebadges are meaningless at best and at worse you will have to convince your uncle or cousin that it is the same card he already owns with a different name and same performance.
 

Chumster

Senior member
Apr 29, 2001
496
0
0
Prior to the GPU14 event, I regularly saw 7970GEs for their 400$+ pricepoint continually on newegg *and amazon.

Isn't that still the case? Just eyeballing Newegg shows the lowest price @ $349. Or am I missing something?
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Isn't that still the case? Just eyeballing Newegg shows the lowest price @ $349. Or am I missing something?

It looks like about half of them are 300-310$ and the other half are...priced very oddly. Not sure what's up with that.
 

Chumster

Senior member
Apr 29, 2001
496
0
0
It looks like about half of them are 300-310$ and the other half are...priced very oddly. Not sure what's up with that.

I'm confused (nVidia user here ) - but I see standard 7970 in that range but all the 7970GE are $350 or above.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
I'm confused (nVidia user here ) - but I see standard 7970 in that range but all the 7970GE are $350 or above.

I think the issue is Amazon messing things up. If you search Amazon for "7970 Ghz", you get cheaper ~$300 models, but they don't actually state that they are the Ghz Edition in the title... because they aren't. They're factory-overclocked vanilla 7970s.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |