5150Joker
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
jsut have to say this,
no flames! sign of this place returning to normal? they shouldnt lock the AEG thread...its keeping the usual fanboys busy
Wait till the G71 is released...
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
jsut have to say this,
no flames! sign of this place returning to normal? they shouldnt lock the AEG thread...its keeping the usual fanboys busy
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
jsut have to say this,
no flames! sign of this place returning to normal? they shouldnt lock the AEG thread...its keeping the usual fanboys busy
Wait till the G71 is released...
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
80nm R600
im all for progress but 90 -> 80nm seems abit, well, pointless
My limited understanding is that it will be cheaper to make and likely use less power. So I guess it is one way to pay for a respin? I am surprised so quick though. Hopefully this means the 7900 is coming along nicely and ati needs more to compete.
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
80nm R600
im all for progress but 90 -> 80nm seems abit, well, pointless
My limited understanding is that it will be cheaper to make and likely use less power. So I guess it is one way to pay for a respin? I am surprised so quick though. Hopefully this means the 7900 is coming along nicely and ati needs more to compete.
i know, but will 10nm drop, make all that much of a difference? i would of thought they'd drop to 65nm next, then 45nm or something.
if it makes a good difference then, they should go for it, but retooling a fab for minimal gains seems odd
Originally posted by: yacoub
I'm sure this won't be the ONLY card using the R590 core.
I'm betting X1800GTO, X1950XT, maybe another card as well.
Also, regarding the drop to 80nm, think about it from the end user perspective. Benefits:
Less power consumption
Runs cooler (overclocking, hello! :] )
More per wafer means slightly cheaper production cost, could be passed on to consumer
Originally posted by: Drayvn
Originally posted by: yacoub
I'm sure this won't be the ONLY card using the R590 core.
I'm betting X1800GTO, X1950XT, maybe another card as well.
Also, regarding the drop to 80nm, think about it from the end user perspective. Benefits:
Less power consumption
Runs cooler (overclocking, hello! :] )
More per wafer means slightly cheaper production cost, could be passed on to consumer
Or most obviously bigger profits for ATi....
Originally posted by: yacoub
I'm sure this won't be the ONLY card using the R590 core.
I'm betting X1800GTO, X1950XT, maybe another card as well.
Also, regarding the drop to 80nm, think about it from the end user perspective. Benefits:
Less power consumption
Runs cooler (overclocking, hello! :] )
More per wafer means slightly cheaper production cost, could be passed on to consumer.
Originally posted by: Steelski
This is a big suprise. Most people thought the R590 was going to be fully featured. Maybee it still will be????? My guess for next ATI top card is still a R580 with higher clock and gddr4.