R9 290 Price Rant

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,440
5,429
136
This is a problem AMD clearly needs to address, but has not. There are a lot of companies out there who will completely remove you as a reseller for selling above msrp. Instead AMD just sits there while gamers walk over to Nvidia because there are no false pricing with their cards. Meanwhile AMD thinks all of these cards being sold are for gamers... Wake up!

Save your speech for supply and demand because this goes far beyond that. At any rate, I'm unable to find legitimately priced 290s so I'm moving to Nvidia now. Mantle has been a pretty sketchy launch, cards are overpriced and AMD is still in this sort of limbo.

Hope they get it together but I'm done waiting.

AMD doesn't sell the completed cards directly to retailers... they sell chips and PCBs to AIB partners who manufacture them, package them, and THEN sell to distributors and retailers.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
This is a problem AMD clearly needs to address, but has not. There are a lot of companies out there who will completely remove you as a reseller for selling above msrp. Instead AMD just sits there while gamers walk over to Nvidia because there are no false pricing with their cards. Meanwhile AMD thinks all of these cards being sold are for gamers... Wake up!

Save your speech for supply and demand because this goes far beyond that. At any rate, I'm unable to find legitimately priced 290s so I'm moving to Nvidia now. Mantle has been a pretty sketchy launch, cards are overpriced and AMD is still in this sort of limbo.

Hope they get it together but I'm done waiting.

There are not a lot. There are some, yes. Those companies are either limited distribution niche products, and/or companies that wield huge marketing power. AMD is neither. They don't even sell to you. They sell to and license partners like Sapphire, MSI, etc..., who then have distributors who sell to the retailers. Completely different scenario.
 

DreamMystic

Junior Member
Jan 21, 2008
11
0
61
This is upsetting to hear, I was looking to get a Radeon 290 for my bday but I can't find any on sale that matches the msrp.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
What AMD is doing is purposeful. They could cripple their gaming cards for mining and sell an uncrippled GPGPU/Mining version if they wanted. They want the hype and sales.

I find it telling that even given the performance and mining craze that AMD felt they couldn't push the MSRP up for launch. Contrast that with Nvidia's mindshare that allows for a $750 780 TI and a $1,000 Titan.

Where would they get these additional cards/chips to cripple? If they had them they could simply increase supply to the market and sell more cards. Manufacturing at TSMC isn't something where you can simply ask for twice as many chips next month.
 

Venomous

Golden Member
Oct 18, 1999
1,180
0
76
What AMD is doing is purposeful. They could cripple their gaming cards for mining and sell an uncrippled GPGPU/Mining version if they wanted. They want the hype and sales.

I find it telling that even given the performance and mining craze that AMD felt they couldn't push the MSRP up for launch. Contrast that with Nvidia's mindshare that allows for a $750 780 TI and a $1,000 Titan.

Well the difference between the 2 is Nvidia does support gamers and builds cards for that purpose. Ever since AMD took over ATI, it's been a real disaster. They are not in touch with gamers and will always be known as the "poor mans" card.

The 290/X could of changed their place in the gaming market but again, it almost looks like their marketing dept continues to steer them in the wrong direction. AMD is in dire need of proper direction in regards to radeon gaming. Retailers should of immediately been slapped on the hands for overpricing and AMD themselves should of sold cards direct to get these things into the hands of gamers.

They should sell a mining card with more brute force at a much higher price. I could careless if they sell a crippled card that can't mine. 290M would be a good start...
 

KentState

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2001
8,397
393
126
This is a problem AMD clearly needs to address, but has not. There are a lot of companies out there who will completely remove you as a reseller for selling above msrp. Instead AMD just sits there while gamers walk over to Nvidia because there are no false pricing with their cards. Meanwhile AMD thinks all of these cards being sold are for gamers... Wake up!

Save your speech for supply and demand because this goes far beyond that. At any rate, I'm unable to find legitimately priced 290s so I'm moving to Nvidia now. Mantle has been a pretty sketchy launch, cards are overpriced and AMD is still in this sort of limbo.

Hope they get it together but I'm done waiting.

AMD provides the GPU and reference design. The manufacturers like Sapphire, MSI, Asus and so on make the cards and sell them through the channels. Would you expect Denso to step in if Nissan dealers were jacking up the price of cars across the country?

Secondly, how does this go beyond supply and demand? Putting artificial barriers on prices is not going to magically increase supply anyways.
 

Midwayman

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
5,723
325
126
Would it be an issue, even if prices are the same on ebay vs newegg etc.? Should Newegg keep tabs on going prices on ebay, and then increase their prices when people are willing to pay a lot for something? I think right now they just automatically have an algorithm to increase prices when supplies are low and people keep buying, and decrease prices when not many people are buying or stock is piling up.

For me, I definitely dislike the mining craze and hate that it raises prices all around. But for the miner sitting there pulling his hair out because he can't find a video card anywhere, I bet he wishes that Newegg would charge more so that us mere mortal gamers wouldn't buy his card and Newegg would still be in stock. He wants Newegg to outbid us for him, and he wants to pay Newegg to do that to us. So I don't really blame newegg here. They would be foolish to give away cards at a low price, because that's just throwing money away and also pissing off miners. Now, consider, who should newegg cater to here? Should they appease gamers who buy 1 card every 2-3 years, or miners who buy every single card available in stock regardless of price? Also, I don't blame newegg because surely they are sitting there thinking "Hey, this will piss off gamers if we raise prices on AMD cards!, oh wait, nevermind, we have all the Nvidia cards in stock so there is still choice, so lets just raise prices to keep more AMD cards in stock for the miners to buy"

I doubt miners are exactly jumping for joy at being price gouged either. That's a lot of extra money to make up per card. If newegg were out of stock selling them at MSRP they'd still be on ebay at inflated price. Only people would at least have a chance at buying at MSRP.

Its kinda like saying we should be happy that the box office is scalping tickets directly instead of 3rd party scalper.

Whatever though. It ups the scumbag factor of Newegg and other resellers to me. Up to them if they want to worry about it.
 

Venomous

Golden Member
Oct 18, 1999
1,180
0
76
Where would they get these additional cards/chips to cripple? If they had them they could simply increase supply to the market and sell more cards. Manufacturing at TSMC isn't something where you can simply ask for twice as many chips next month.

You don't actually believe they have a real supply issue do you?
 

Venomous

Golden Member
Oct 18, 1999
1,180
0
76
AMD provides the GPU and reference design. The manufacturers like Sapphire, MSI, Asus and so on make the cards and sell them through the channels. Would you expect Denso to step in if Nissan dealers were jacking up the price of cars across the country?

Secondly, how does this go beyond supply and demand? Putting artificial barriers on prices is not going to magically increase supply anyways.

I like how everyone automatically assumes there's a supply issue lol. The cards are overpriced and sitting on shelves. Even newegg received stock but did not sell the cards so they could create these mining bundles...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,231
5,807
126
AMD would pump more GPUs onto the Market if they could. They are limited by what Manufacturing is available.
 

Venomous

Golden Member
Oct 18, 1999
1,180
0
76
I doubt miners are exactly jumping for joy at being price gouged either. That's a lot of extra money to make up per card. If newegg were out of stock selling them at MSRP they'd still be on ebay at inflated price. Only people would at least have a chance at buying at MSRP.

Its kinda like saying we should be happy that the box office is scalping tickets directly instead of 3rd party scalper.

Whatever though. It ups the scumbag factor of Newegg and other resellers to me. Up to them if they want to worry about it.

I hear ya man.

Yeah newegg and the rest of them would learn a very valuable lesson if AMD slapped them. Newegg themselves has gotten pretty greedy over the last 4 years and I'm finding myself shopping amazon more or less first.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
You don't actually believe they have a real supply issue do you?

First, I never said they had a supply issue. I was simply stating that manufacturing on the level that TSMC does isn't fluid. You need to place your orders many months ahead of time. Likely a year at least. You can't simply ask them to make you more. You also can't simply tell them to never mind because you over estimated demand. Remember what happened to AMD with GF when their CPU/APU sales didn't hit projections? They had to pay them $320M to reduce their purchase commitment. If AMD decided to up production at TSMC, assuming they even can, it's the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with the mining market. They'd be better of to simply invest directly in BTC, than take the risk on ordering product that might not sell if the GPU mining market takes a downturn.

As far as the supply, we can only go by the evidence. You find someone, like Amazon for example, who is selling models for MSRP and they are on back order. So, are you saying that there are plenty of cards and AMD is holding them back to artificially increase demand? There's no evidence of that. I'll point to them being completely sold out on Newegg before they increased at retail. Newegg's retail is controlled by a bot that dynamically adjusts pricing with demand. It all seems pretty simple and non nefarious. Purely market driven.
 

Venomous

Golden Member
Oct 18, 1999
1,180
0
76
First, I never said they had a supply issue. I was simply stating that manufacturing on the level that TSMC does isn't fluid. You need to place your orders many months ahead of time. Likely a year at least. You can't simply ask them to make you more. You also can't simply tell them to never mind because you over estimated demand. Remember what happened to AMD with GF when their CPU/APU sales didn't hit projections? They had to pay them $320M to reduce their purchase commitment. If AMD decided to up production at TSMC, assuming they even can, it's the equivalent of playing Russian roulette with the mining market. They'd be better of to simply invest directly in BTC, than take the risk on ordering product that might not sell if the GPU mining market takes a downturn.

As far as the supply, we can only go by the evidence. You find someone, like Amazon for example, who is selling models for MSRP and they are on back order. So, are you saying that there are plenty of cards and AMD is holding them back to artificially increase demand? There's no evidence of that. I'll point to them being completely sold out on Newegg before they increased at retail. Newegg's retail is controlled by a bot that dynamically adjusts pricing with demand. It all seems pretty simple and non nefarious. Purely market driven.

If that was the case, you wouldn't be finding these cards in the masses across Europe and places like Australia and New Zealand. The cards are in stock there without the mining tax to boot. It's quite irritating to be honest.

I run across more gamers in bf4 with 7xxx cards thn actual r9s. That has to be alarming to anyone at AMD. The ones who do have r9s are the guys who got the reference cards with the bf4 bundle.
 
Last edited:

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
If that was the case, you wouldn't be finding these cards in the masses across Europe and places like Australia and New Zealand. The cards are in stock there without the mining tax to boot. It's quite irritating to be honest.

I run across more gamers in bf4 with 7xxx cards thn actual r9s. That has to be alarming to anyone at AMD. The ones who do have r9s are the guys who got the reference cards with the bf4 bundle.

If you think supply in Europe and Australasia are linked to North American supply you don't understand how it works. It would take a full blown market crisis before they would consider redistribution of product around the globe. They certainly wouldn't do it to reduce prices in a market.

I can see the board meeting now explaining why the company is going to incur the expense of global redistribution to drive their own prices down.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,440
5,429
136
Well the difference between the 2 is Nvidia does support gamers and builds cards for that purpose. Ever since AMD took over ATI, it's been a real disaster. They are not in touch with gamers and will always be known as the "poor mans" card.

The 290/X could of changed their place in the gaming market but again, it almost looks like their marketing dept continues to steer them in the wrong direction. AMD is in dire need of proper direction in regards to radeon gaming. Retailers should of immediately been slapped on the hands for overpricing and AMD themselves should of sold cards direct to get these things into the hands of gamers.

They should sell a mining card with more brute force at a much higher price. I could careless if they sell a crippled card that can't mine. 290M would be a good start...

A 290/X is a "poor mans" [sic] card? LOL. Let's be realistic: even at MSRP of $399 a 290 is a "1%er" type card, not to mention the more expensive GTX 780, 290X, 780 Ti.

I'm a gamer and I use crossfire 290s. Quite pleased with them as I max out everything I play and it runs smoothly. I was pleased with my GTX 670 as well at the time I had it. I notice exactly zero difference in my gaming "experience" as both solutions just worked for me.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,440
5,429
136
If that was the case, you wouldn't be finding these cards in the masses across Europe and places like Australia and New Zealand. The cards are in stock there without the mining tax to boot. It's quite irritating to be honest.

I run across more gamers in bf4 with 7xxx cards thn actual r9s. That has to be alarming to anyone at AMD. The ones who do have r9s are the guys who got the reference cards with the bf4 bundle.

I sincerely doubt anyone at AMD is sweating about R9 290/X sales.
 

Will Robinson

Golden Member
Dec 19, 2009
1,408
0
0
Well the difference between the 2 is Nvidia does support gamers and builds cards for that purpose. Ever since AMD took over ATI, it's been a real disaster. They are not in touch with gamers and will always be known as the "poor mans" card.

The 290/X could of changed their place in the gaming market but again, it almost looks like their marketing dept continues to steer them in the wrong direction. AMD is in dire need of proper direction in regards to radeon gaming. Retailers should of immediately been slapped on the hands for overpricing and AMD themselves should of sold cards direct to get these things into the hands of gamers.

They should sell a mining card with more brute force at a much higher price. I could careless if they sell a crippled card that can't mine. 290M would be a good start...

I can afford any video card on the market...in fact I just bought 4 x R9 290s for a fun mining rig.I also use AMD cards for gaming by choice,not by price.
I do not consider AMD cards to be a "poor man's card".
If NV cards were better at mining I would have bought them.

By your logic NV cards should be seen as "A rich man's card"
 

chihlidog

Senior member
Apr 12, 2011
884
1
81
So you would rather go to nVidia? Have you already forgotten the Titan @ $1K and what the 780 sold for before AMD forced them to reduce prices? That's was purely on nVidia too. It wasn't the market that drove the price up after they released. Sorry, but you aren't making sense, mate. :\

Titan is still $1k. It is what it is. I'm not talking about selling a unique product for whatever you want to charge for it because nobody else has the product.

When the Titan was released, it had its MSRP. That was that. I could buy a titan for a grand if wanted to then, and I can now. Can we say that for the R9s? Nope. And yes, it is more due to the resellers like Newegg, who I will not be purchasing from anymore. As I mentoned earlier, Amazon has been pretty good about keeping whatever stock they can get at or near MSRP. I respect that and I will be ordering from them when I pull the trigger next week on my new rig.

It still reflects on AMD. It's their brand. DO I even WANT to go NVidia? No, I always supported AMD as a company over intel and NVidia. My last rig, I went intel because at th time it was so far ahead of anything I could get from AMD I "went to the dark side". Thermal issues, speed, overclocking ability, my i5 was just miles ahead of anything I could get from AMD, and I was really tired of my old 6000+ running hot as the blazes of hell. I felt terrible doing it, too. I wanted to support AMD, and I continued to with my card. My 5850, 4850 before that, X1900 pro before that, my 4200+, the 5000+ still in my wife's dinosaur of a PC, my old Thunderbird, I've shown a lot of support for AMD intentionally. I fully intended with this build to keep with AMD.

But not at such an insane premium over the similar- performance NVidia card. Not a chance. Not at literally $150 or more over the MSRP. That's the real difference. If you dont feel it's shady, great, but the retailers selling them at such insanely inflated prices, and AMD doing nothing to stop it doesnt sit well with me.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
Titan is still $1k. It is what it is. I'm not talking about selling a unique product for whatever you want to charge for it because nobody else has the product.

When the Titan was released, it had its MSRP. That was that. I could buy a titan for a grand if wanted to then, and I can now. Can we say that for the R9s? Nope. And yes, it is more due to the resellers like Newegg, who I will not be purchasing from anymore. As I mentoned earlier, Amazon has been pretty good about keeping whatever stock they can get at or near MSRP. I respect that and I will be ordering from them when I pull the trigger next week on my new rig.

It still reflects on AMD. It's their brand. DO I even WANT to go NVidia? No, I always supported AMD as a company over intel and NVidia. My last rig, I went intel because at th time it was so far ahead of anything I could get from AMD I "went to the dark side". Thermal issues, speed, overclocking ability, my i5 was just miles ahead of anything I could get from AMD, and I was really tired of my old 6000+ running hot as the blazes of hell. I felt terrible doing it, too. I wanted to support AMD, and I continued to with my card. My 5850, 4850 before that, X1900 pro before that, my 4200+, the 5000+ still in my wife's dinosaur of a PC, my old Thunderbird, I've shown a lot of support for AMD intentionally. I fully intended with this build to keep with AMD.

But not at such an insane premium over the similar- performance NVidia card. Not a chance. Not at literally $150 or more over the MSRP. That's the real difference. If you dont feel it's shady, great, but the retailers selling them at such insanely inflated prices, and AMD doing nothing to stop it doesnt sit well with me.

I'm not questioning your loyalty or buying patterns. I'm just trying to tell you that your logic and understanding of the situation is flawed. When you state things on a public forum that aren't accurate, someone's going to point it out. You are free to buy whatever you want to, obviously. There's nothing wrong with nVidia cards. I'm sure you'll enjoy them. Peace.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,231
5,807
126
I'm not questioning your loyalty or buying patterns. I'm just trying to tell you that your logic and understanding of the situation is flawed. When you state things on a public forum that aren't accurate, someone's going to point it out. You are free to buy whatever you want to, obviously. There's nothing wrong with nVidia cards. I'm sure you'll enjoy them. Peace.

Indeed. Titan being $1k as dictated by Nvidia is ok, but retailers gouging the price of AMD cards due to Demand is AMDs fault?
 

chihlidog

Senior member
Apr 12, 2011
884
1
81
I'm not questioning your loyalty or buying patterns. I'm just trying to tell you that your logic and understanding of the situation is flawed. When you state things on a public forum that aren't accurate, someone's going to point it out. You are free to buy whatever you want to, obviously. There's nothing wrong with nVidia cards. I'm sure you'll enjoy them. Peace.

I dont think we disagree on the facts, I think we simply see them differently. I'm more than willing to recognize anything that I may have my facts wrong about. However, where we seem to disagree is whether it's ethical/respectable/decent business and customer service to raise the prices by such a significant amount due to high demand.

For me it comes down to that MSRP. It isnt a materials shortage, an earthquake, etc. driving the prices up. It's greed. Companies and retailers should make money. That's why they exist. But the level of greed being displayed here is extremely distasteful to me. Cards are released at MSRP. Cards are all bought up. Retailer says whoa....we can charge another 50% for these cards, woohoo...that's just pure greed. It's the American way. OK. I get it. Doesnt mean I like it, and I'll be doing the only thing a consumer can do.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
While I don't care for the inflated prices on the AMD cards I really can't blame AMD for doing nothing about it. If they were to slap retailers and force prices back down to MSRP, while some gamers might be able to grab some cards at that price they would also be competing with miners. Those two groups would be competing with the people who scarf up as many as they can to sell on ebay to both groups at highly inflated prices. Even if they put a limit on how many cards a single person could buy, there are easy ways around that too. Our daughter had to wait until Jan. 21st to get her 290 but at least she was able to grab one from TigerDirect for $29.00 over MSRP.

Unfortunately it truly is a problem with supply and demand as gamers are having to compete with miners and speculators. There's no easy answer to this problem other than for demand to subside or a radical increase in the supply. I bet AMD would love to be flooding the market with cards to sell right now as they would fly off of the shelves. I'm sure that AMD had placed their orders with TMSC with gamers in mind, not speculators and miners.
 

Venomous

Golden Member
Oct 18, 1999
1,180
0
76
I'm not questioning your loyalty or buying patterns. I'm just trying to tell you that your logic and understanding of the situation is flawed. When you state things on a public forum that aren't accurate, someone's going to point it out. You are free to buy whatever you want to, obviously. There's nothing wrong with nVidia cards. I'm sure you'll enjoy them. Peace.

Well I certainly don't agree with some of your opinions, but that's a given on public forums. Your logic at understanding OUR opinion is flawed. AMD better get it together because when this whole mining craze is over and the dust settles, they won't be the ones with the marketshare because their products being overpriced just opened the flood gates to their competitor.

It is not ok for a company who is trying to chase the leader, to sit back and allow their competitively priced msrp, become priced at the same level as their competitor. I like AMD cards for the value to performance ratio, but when priced above what I can get a 780 for, it's a no brainer to walk. This is a common occurrence, especially those who actually choose to be a supporter for AMD who are just simply frustrated with what's happening.

I think it's time for AMD to seriously look at this situation and address it. If they choose not too, well then they deserve to be in the position they are in.

I have to ask, do you think you would last in a board meeting with your responses to supply and demand when the man running the company is asking why the set price msrp isn't being met?

I'm pretty sure you will be packing up your desk and shown the exit.
 

chihlidog

Senior member
Apr 12, 2011
884
1
81
Indeed. Titan being $1k as dictated by Nvidia is ok, but retailers gouging the price of AMD cards due to Demand is AMDs fault?

I think I am still being somewhat misunderstood. Like I said in my previous post, AMD set an MSRP based on what their costs were, how much they thought the market would bear, and what would get them a profit. Awesome.

Now the demand is so high that retailers are charging every last dime they can get for the cards, the MSRP is thrown to the wind, it's the wild west, oooh look we got 20 R9s in, charge every last dime we can sell 'em for. Yes, that's capitalism, yes, capitalism is based in part on greed. I get that and I'm not going to suggest that someone should be punished for it. But we arent talking about a small premium here. We're talking charging 150% of the MSRP or more. Frankly, I'm surprised that there are people who DONT get a bad taste from this. But that's the free market.

I take issue with established retailers doing this, and I take issue with AMD not doing anything to settle it. I dont HAVE to buy the product, but it does suck feeling like all these years of supporting the underdog and this is where we are. Screw 'em.
 
Last edited:

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,231
5,807
126
I think I am still being somewhat misunderstood. Like I said in my previous post, AMD set an MSRP based on what their costs were, how much they thought the market would bear, and what would get them a profit. Awesome.

Now the demand is so high that retailers are charging every last dime they can get for the cards, the MSRP is thrown to the wind, it's the wild west, oooh look we got 20 R9s in, charge every last dime we can sell 'em for. Yes, that's capitalism, yes, capitalism is based in part on greed. I get that and I'm not going to suggest that someone should be punished for it. But we arent talking about a small premium here. We're talking charging 150% of the MSRP or more. Frankly, I'm surprised that there are people who DONT get a bad taste from this. But that's the free market.

It's the Retailers doing it, not AMD. Getting a bad taste about AMD from it, while knowing who is really to blame makes no sense.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |