Radeon review inconsistancy

[dave5317]

From what I read,Radeon is great and able to beat GF.I have never try ATI card and dun really know.I changed 3 cards b4 and all of them are GF(GTS,Pro and ultra).I m happy with the performance with my wins98 and also win2k.I'm lookin fwd to give readeon a try for my next pc.What I can say is....there's great and can't afford to be miss for hardcore gamers like me.

 

[SpeedTrap]

if you want fast games get a geforce if you want a little better quality and slower framerates get a radeon

 

[TableSalt]

I am running a 64MB Radeon DDR with the latest special purpose drivers from ATI's site (7115's). When compared to a 32MB Geforce GTS on a friends PC with the 12.90's the Geforce does achieve an overal higher frame rate. Both machines are running an Asus A7V133 with Athlon-C 1GHz CPU's and VIA 4.32 drivers on WinME. The Radeon how ever looks much better image wise and has less artifacting. I have my Radeon oc'ed from 183MHz to 205MHz and it works great. Get the Radeon!

 

[EdipisReks]

i think that i probbaly will get the radeon, especially as the SE version is starting to become more prevalent. thanks for your help, everybody! i really appreciate it.

--jacob

 

[BFG10K]

i think that i probbaly will get the radeon, especially as the SE version is starting to become more prevalent

If you can find one of the damn things. ATi seems to enjoy hiding them.