I don't think that is a real Radeon card either, but it has nothing to do with the pic, but rather with the marketing strategy. WHy would ATI make a card (theoretically) this late in the game when they are coming out with the Radeon2 in about 2 months? If they really are coming out with this card, then I think it is a poorly executed move on management's part. By the way, who cares who is fake? End the threadcrapping now and it won't make any difference. I don't know if it counts as a qualified opinion since I don't have some sort of benchmark to rely on (which people are putting too much credence into, IMHO), but I had a 32MB DDR, a Visiontek 64MB GTS (currently), and I just bought a Elsa Gladiac 64MB Ultra (for a power system I'm building now), and to be honest I son't see any difference in 2d quality on a trintron monitor, they are both pretty damn good. Basically the reason I've started moving towards Nvidia is because 1) I use Win2k, and 2) I had the money to afford an Ultra. If I were on a tighter budget, and wasn't using Win2k, I would definitely consider the 64MB Radeon.