Clearly our neighbors should have invited that violent problem into their homes, by the tens of millions. Oh right, they never had to do that, because a third (and counting) of all Americans didn't need to flee the country.
I'm not actually sure what point you're getting across here, but I think it sounds like you're trying to look out for the welfare of those Americans that live on the border. Which is all well and good, but I think they feel more threatened than they actually are.
We have nations, borders, a rule of law, for a reason.
That people cannot respect that is a sign of the times we live in. "We're all human" is not enough.
A sign of the times? People have been coming to America from foreign countries since day one. And I mean human in the sense that all humans are vulnerable to the same flaws everyone is so quick to point out in immigrants. They are no better, no worse.
You'll have a nice field of crops with that strawman. Go find someone it applies to. If you're so keen to fill in the blanks, to reply to me with what you THINK I think, let me fill it in for you. Saves you the trouble of making shit up next time.
When the only thought you express, in so many words, is "They are different because they are violent" one can only gather so much information. It's an inference at worst, no need to be so hostile.
Mexico's problems are with its people. A third of its population moved up here, and many counties in our nation are teeming full of poverty stricken violence ridden illegals from south of the border. Most importantly, there's a very real segregation and alienation between them and US citizens. They are not treated as equals, they are an abused underclass akin to slave labor and this scenario is going to explode some day.
Maybe you'll notice it the first time this alienated population assumes majority control of a state, such as California. An impoverished and alienated population within the United States, numbering in the tens of millions (and growing to become a hundred million within our life time) whose national and cultural identity remain with their former home is the biggest domestic crisis we have faced since the civil war.
Every countries problem's lie with it's people. And I agree their treatment is very poor, I grew up alongside some of them and have worked with them as an adult. You are entirely correct saying that there is a cultural disconnect between much of the Hispanic population and the white (and black) populations. And the abuse of their willingness to work is dangerous for both sides.
But I don't understand the implication or connection between saying "they are violent" and "they are mistreated". It's almost paradoxical because, while it of course exists, I can't say I've heard much about Pro-Hispanic [hate] crimes. But there could be a lot of reasons for that (it's easier to sell the big guy beating up the little guy than vice versa).
I also don't see the fault with them wanting to retain their heritage. There's some degree of integration expected but most of the Hispanics I've ever dealt with have at least known enough English to function or had a family member or friend to speak through. Painting them holding onto what they feel makes them "them" as a problem is, I think, intolerant. If you move to another country are you going to learn their national anthem, adopt all their nuances, behaviors, tendencies and just let go of your own traditions and ideas? I doubt it and I wouldn't ask you to at any rate.
Additionally, to say a third of their population just up and walked across the border is misleading. True Mexico has about ~110M people and true the Hispanic-Mexican population in the US is about ~30M, but that's not accounting at all for the fact that some Mexican families have been here for generations, had children here, grown the population. They didn't simply have some mass exodus.
Albeit dated and since the 1980 census the Hispanic population has grown 3-4x (So the numbers I found seemed to indicate) so while it's probably shifted, I would think the native born percent of Mexican-Americans to be very substantial, if not still the majority.