Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
Originally posted by: Michael1897
i agree that since it is public schools and they fall under the gov't and the gov't has drug laws that the schools follow. then it ok. but still you will need probable cause and it better be good.
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
then dont go to public schools. It's a free education(not considering taxes). If you so adament against it, send your kids to private schools.
That's not in place yet - come on up Lucky.Originally posted by: Lucky
hey canada, you still forcing newcomers to live in antartica?
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
then dont go to public schools. It's a free education(not considering taxes). If you so adament against it, send your kids to private schools.
most people dont have the luxury of being able to afford private schools
Originally posted by: Lucky
hey canada, you still forcing newcomers to live in antartica?
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
then dont go to public schools. It's a free education(not considering taxes). If you so adament against it, send your kids to private schools.
most people dont have the luxury of being able to afford private schools
then they should not have the luxury of being able to afford drugs, yeah? Obviously they are paying for them somehow.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
then dont go to public schools. It's a free education(not considering taxes). If you so adament against it, send your kids to private schools.
most people dont have the luxury of being able to afford private schools
then they should not have the luxury of being able to afford drugs, yeah? Obviously they are paying for them somehow.
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
then dont go to public schools. It's a free education(not considering taxes). If you so adament against it, send your kids to private schools.
most people dont have the luxury of being able to afford private schools
then they should not have the luxury of being able to afford drugs, yeah? Obviously they are paying for them somehow.
you make no sense
I said that the same people who cant afford private school are the ones who are afraid of drug test because they fear being caught.
Originally posted by: Lucky
I said that the same people who cant afford private school are the ones who are afraid of drug test because they fear being caught.
From the article:
The court ruled against a former Oklahoma high school honor student who competed on an academic quiz team and sang in the choir. Lindsay Earls, a self-described ?goodie two-shoes,? tested negative but sued over what she called a humiliating and accusatory policy.
then they should not have the luxury of being able to afford drugs, yeah? Obviously they are paying for them somehow.
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
I dont understand why people would be humiliated over taking a drug test. I have taken a few mostly for jobs, and never once did i feel that the policy was humiliating or accusatory.
Originally posted by: gigapet
even more rediculous is the idea that these drug tests cant even detect certain drugs......special k , lsd .......its so pointless
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: gigapet
invasion of privacy ..............f that ish total bullsh!t
glad i'm not in highschool
so i wuoldnt be subjected to such humiliation
then dont go to public schools. It's a free education(not considering taxes). If you so adament against it, send your kids to private schools.
most people dont have the luxury of being able to afford private schools
then they should not have the luxury of being able to afford drugs, yeah? Obviously they are paying for them somehow.
ok you need to start thinking befor you post: 1) families dont supply there kids with drugs or drug money 2) high schoolers usually dont have habits that are equivalent to the cost of private school (up to 20,000 a year for some schools)