SOSTrooper
Platinum Member
- Dec 27, 2001
- 2,552
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Let another 67% roll in!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is absolutely ridiculous. I followed the instructions to the T and never once did it mention the stuff she has written on this one:
Apparently, I didn't define all the terms (Yet there are only two and they definitely have definitions next to them from the book). That is -5.
Despite that the book says to use the table on this page, for the experimental data table, apparently that is wrong and im not supposed to have one of the columns. -5.
Although the book does not ANYWHERE list the need for a table in results and conclusions apparently she had different ideas. -8.
And finally to top this whole damn thing off: INCORRECT CALCULATIONS!!!!! I copied the equation from the book and got the exact same number she did!!! EXACT SAME!!! Yet her equation went about it differently so i get another -5!!!!!
Then on the next page i have a minor error that the Stoichiometric Coefficient definition isn't good enough for her...thats right, the definition out of the book is not good enough: -1.
Then on the pre-lab questions this is a real joke. I forgot to, IN MY CALCULATIONS, write a subscript 2 for Na(2)SO(4)....-2.
Then I dont have a clue why but i got -1 for the result. No explanation, all work is shown, but there is a nice -1 sitting next to it (Yes it is the right answer).
On the reverse side I didn't answer a question..-2 acceptable. I didn't know how to do it so i gave up.
The next questions i answered fully and correctly yet i have -2 written next to them with no explanation!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a joke. The class average was a 72; I received a 67.
Guys what do i do? I am follow the instructions, i am explaining needless amounts of information and yet im getting counted off for apparently nothing at all!!
-Kevin
If you scan in your lab report, then maybe we can have a better understanding on whether or not you wrote sufficiently enough. One thing you'll learn in chemistry labs is that you need to be very meticulous. Wrong subscripts, wrong charge, wrong sig figs, and sloppy calculator can really get you down.