Originally posted by: rh71
Oh please. In the majority of tailgaiting cases, the driver who's in the way shouldn't be there in the first place. If you were any kind of courteous/anticipatory driver, you'd be out of their way when you see a car fly up/into the left lane behind you... what did you think their next move was ?
Right. In the majority of cases the tailgater is speeding over the limit on a highway full of traffic. Otherwise he would not be hanging on the rear, but passed you in another lane. So, let's get the facts straight: someone is braking the law here making the road unsafe for everyone. Mmmkay? Now, we can proceed to the next portion:
Why would you move out of the way as soon as you see some @sshole hanging on your rear breaking the law? It could be unsafe both for you and the other people around you. I've been almost hit when I decided to let some idiot go at the closest turnout and started pulling to the right when the lane split. guess what? This shmuck saw my turn signal, so me trying to get out of the way, and yet his reflexes were already lcoked onto passing me _on the right_. So, he almost slammed inb my rear.
I do agree with you that a courteous driver could pull to the right (if he can and is safe to do so), but he does not have to, so that the idiot behind could save his precious 2 seconds.
Why should they hit you ? They'd be 100% at fault.
You know, you make an impression of an intelligent person, yet this remark is lamest ever. Why would they hit you? Mmm, let me guess - you see the road hazard which they can't because their eyes are fvcking glued to your rear? Because they do not possess F1 pilot's reflexes?
It's nice to know they were 100% at fault when you are wedged in the car and paramedics extract your body with jaws of life. 'Wake the fvck up'. Right.