RBG dead

[snoopy7548]

It's more like:

Democrats are in power
Republicans, "We will not appoint a new Supreme Court justice in an election year."

Republicans are in power
Republicans, "We will appoint a new Supreme Court justice in an election year."

Republicans, as blankslate said, have been the ones taking these actions, not Democrats. It doesn't matter what anyone says, it matters what they do.

 

[blankslate]

Ah got it - so they WOULD have considered it the rule of law if they had the chance. Sure. Right. Oh yeah, totally.

Even though there is ZERO records - recordings - or any admittance from the left saying that they now accept this as a rule - but there is TONS of documented footage of tons (if not 50+) of high-up democrats saying that a SCOTUS should always be appointed ASAP.

Do you tell yourself shit like that in the mirror and honestly believe yourself for half a second?

Quit implying that I said things I didn't

I specifically said that the Dems haven't had a chance to honor or reject the precedent set by the repubs in 2016
Now maybe if given the chance they would ignore it.

We know this though...

The Repubs have ignored the precedent they set as soon as following it would disadvantage them.
And then the Repubs did mental gymnastic backtracking in a brazenly dishonest (that only the most gullible or partisan would accept) way to attempt to deny the fact that they are being hypocrites.

If you want to defend that then I am definitely not the one who needs to look deeply into a mirror.


_____
*edited for corrections to glaring spelling & grammatical errors (some probably still exist)

 

[nickqt]

Quit implying that I said things I didn't

I specifically said that the Dems haven't had a chance to honor or reject the precedent set by the repubs in 2016
Now maybe if given the chance they would ignore it.

We know this though...

The Repubs have ignored the precedent they set as soon as following it would disadvantage them.
And then the Repubs did mental gymnastic backtracking in a brazenly dishonest (that only the most gullible or partisan would accept) way to attempt to deny the fact that they are being hypocrites.

If you want to defend that then I am definitely not the one who needs to look deeply into a mirror.


_____
*edited for corrections to glaring spelling & grammatical errors (some probably still exist)

Nobody typically screams hysterically at a mirror and posts it here for us to laugh about. I wouldn't take anything he screams at himself personally.

 

[zinfamous]

Republicans are just the slimiest of the slime
Ted Cruz blocks resolution honoring Ginsburg after Tucker Carlson pushes conspiracy theory about her

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ted-cruz-blocks-resolution-honoring-165439573.html

so like, only a day after Fox was forced to admit in court that Tucker was a clown liar?

That's just, well, precious.

 

[SMOGZINN]

Ah got it - so they WOULD have considered it the rule of law if they had the chance. Sure. Right. Oh yeah, totally.

Even though there is ZERO records - recordings - or any admittance from the left saying that they now accept this as a rule - but there is TONS of documented footage of tons (if not 50+) of high-up democrats saying that a SCOTUS should always be appointed ASAP.

Do you tell yourself shit like that in the mirror and honestly believe yourself for half a second? It's quite comical that you guys have your heads that far up.

So, a preemptive bothsides?
If you don't even live by the rules you set yourself, then what do you live by?
Are you really saying that the Republicans should ditch their own rules because they think that if the tables were reversed that the Democrats would not live by the rules that Republicans set for themselves?

Answer one question for me: Under that argument is there ANYTHING that they won't do? Is there any bar to low that they can't just say 'Well given the chance someone else would do it, so we should first!'

Whatever happened to personal responsibility? What ever happened to 'two wrongs don't make a right'? Is this what sort of politics we really want?

 

[nickqt]

So, a preemptive bothsides?
If you don't even live by the rules you set yourself, then what do you live by?
Are you really saying that the Republicans should ditch their own rules because they think that if the tables were reversed that the Democrats would not live by the rules that Republicans set for themselves?

Answer one question for me: Under that argument is there ANYTHING that they won't do? Is there any bar to low that they can't just say 'Well given the chance someone else would do it, so we should first!'

Whatever happened to personal responsibility? What ever happened to 'two wrongs don't make a right'? Is this what sort of politics we really want?

I mean...do you expect Nobody to come back and respond with some thought out, reasonable answer?

Nobody's schtick is to stare menacingly into a mirror, call it a fucking moron, and then type LOL in victory.