Is that an insult or an observation?
Right... If you're going to insult someone you should at least be man enough to own it.
Those who can't refute the central point resort to refuting technicalities in order to avoid altering their world view to match reality.I do understand hyperbole...
It was a stupid comment, I just pointed it out.
As when I make a statement such as he did you would be one of the ringleaders pointing out how stupid you think it is.
Those who can't refute the central point resort to refuting technicalities in order to avoid altering their world view to match reality.
If the Republicans do manage to create a 6-3 majority, it will not in any way reflect public opinion.
The House should just shut up and let the Senate do this already. A quick pre-election confirmation likely helps both Biden and the Dems’ Senate chances. Let the Republicans perform their skulduggery now, make them pay out the ass after January.
Ignore is your friend.Can we have a sticky at the top of the forum for all posters who should be on ignore when you come to this forum? I have at least 4 id like to nominate. That way they will just leave when no one ever responds or see's their messages. Seriously, their responses are not even worthy of being read because they lack reading comprehension, information retention, logic, reason, etc.
If not a sticky can we all just agree to do it?
It is called sarcasm. Your meter broken?
Sportage called her a demon. I made fun of him with sarcasm. Having issues with your languaging? LOL
She has the freedom of religion. She doesn't have to meet your standard.
Right... If you're going to insult someone you should at least be man enough to own it.
If the Republicans do manage to create a 6-3 majority, it will not in any way reflect public opinion.
The House should just shut up and let the Senate do this already. A quick pre-election confirmation likely helps both Biden and the Dems’ Senate chances. Let the Republicans perform their skulduggery now, make them pay out the ass after January.
Ignore is your friend.
It's what jesus would doTexas Pastor says his prayers were responsible for RBG dying.
'No Accident': Conservative Pastor Says His Prayer Was Cause of RBG's Death
"President Trump will establish a new Supreme Court justice," Pastor Robert Henderson said. "That's no accident."www.newsweek.com
Lol ... Todays Republican base
The republicans are going against precedent they set just over 4 years ago...I'm simply saying that is by definition also hypocrisy. It's a classic "Do as I say, not as I do"
This is probably my fault - I was thinking "surely there's no way this year can get any worse" - which clearly angered the Gods.
What happened was Romney realized that Trump's nominee list mirrored Romney's own nominee list. Remember who Mitt Romney is and how religion is everything to Mitt Romney. Mitt couldn't be happier with the possibility of Amy Coney Barrett on the high court. Just look into her eyes, the eyes of total religious insanity. Just imagine this flaming haired demon deciding laws that affect YOU.
View attachment 30405
The republicans are going against precedent they set just over 4 years ago...
the Democratic party has not had an opportunity to get control of the Senate and deny a Republican president a nomination to SCotUS in the last year of his term yet (Obama's nominee who wasn't even very leftist mostly a bit more left of center than radical iirc; didn't even get a hearing)...
So you're charge of hypocrisy by the Democrats has to be for something not even closely similar to the specific hypocrisy that the republicans are engaging in currently in relation to SCotUS picks
and I don't believe the crap that you weren't defending their hypocrisy.... you replied to my post didn't you?
_______________
*edited to add words in parenthesis in 2nd paragraph.
Seems pretty clear the new "law of the land" is FYGM. Go for it Dem's!So tell me where Democrats stated that they now accept this rule as the new law of the land and that they would abide by this precedent for any future similar situations that they come across.
Can you explain to me please, how the Senate Majority Leader, Denying a sitting president, that President's Constitutional RIGHT, to appoint AND for the Senate to hold a hearing and vote yes or no on that appointment. 9 months before the election, and almost 12 months before inauguration.How is it willful ignorance when we all know an appointment of a SCOTUS Justice is perfectly legal. It doesn't matter if you like it or not. I don't think he should at this point either.
I'm not going to play what if with the Hillary Game. No point in it.