Discussion RDNA4 + CDNA3 Architectures Thread

Page 393 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,762
6,682
136





With the GFX940 patches in full swing since first week of March, it is looking like MI300 is not far in the distant future!
Usually AMD takes around 3Qs to get the support in LLVM and amdgpu. Lately, since RDNA2 the window they push to add support for new devices is much reduced to prevent leaks.
But looking at the flurry of code in LLVM, it is a lot of commits. Maybe because US Govt is starting to prepare the SW environment for El Capitan (Maybe to avoid slow bring up situation like Frontier for example)

See here for the GFX940 specific commits
Or Phoronix

There is a lot more if you know whom to follow in LLVM review chains (before getting merged to github), but I am not going to link AMD employees.

I am starting to think MI300 will launch around the same time like Hopper probably only a couple of months later!
Although I believe Hopper had problems not having a host CPU capable of doing PCIe 5 in the very near future therefore it might have gotten pushed back a bit until SPR and Genoa arrives later in 2022.
If PVC slips again I believe MI300 could launch before it

This is nuts, MI100/200/300 cadence is impressive.



Previous thread on CDNA2 and RDNA3 here

 
Last edited:

HurleyBird

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2003
2,781
1,483
136
Let's hope AMD is gonna announce GDRR7 version with +15% perf

It feels like there's tension here because I can see us getting a G7 version or a 32GB version in the future, but I have a hard time seeing both. It would create a confused product stack, while the main thing G7 would do for a theoretical 32GB "ghetto prosumer" SKU is balloon cost and/or shrink margins, which doesn't make much sense when whole the whole selling point of that SKU would be capacity/$.
 
Reactions: scineram

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,581
4,066
136
www.teamjuchems.com
It feels like there's tension here because I can see us getting a G7 version or a 32GB version in the future, but I have a hard time seeing both. It would create a confused product stack, while the main thing G7 would do for a theoretical 32GB "ghetto prosumer" SKU is balloon cost and/or shrink margins, which doesn't make much sense when whole the whole selling point of that SKU would be capacity/$.
More likely a new top sku with 24GB of GDRR7 to match the Blackwell Super refresh likely to do the same. G7 has memory chips in multiples of threes coming in the pipeline so todays 16GB cards can be next years 24GB cards.
 

fastandfurious6

Senior member
Jun 1, 2024
382
528
96
View attachment 119129
Yeah they might have juuuust pushed it a lil' smidge too hard for nothing.

yeah defaults are set on safe side, can't have online posts complaining random crashes lol

this is big, 9700XT @ 260W with perf close to desktop RTX5080 @ 350-400W

top-end laptop gpu W is around 200W, total system 'thermal/W threshold' around 250-300W

so RDNA5 mobile will likely have similar perf up to desktop RTX5070 - 5080

i.e. Medusa Halo on a heavier SKU as well
 

Kronos1996

Member
Dec 28, 2022
32
63
61
My technically astute friend, who annotates die shots, thinks its unlikely Navi 48 has the PHY’s to support GDDR6 and GDDR7. If it does there should be physical evidence, which remains to be seen without better pictures. They’re very different interfaces so it could be a lot of wasted silicon to add both. Unless you had a very good reason.

I’m skeptical that was ever planned for the small monolithic Navi 44 and therefore Navi 48. Probably was for the big chiplet designs. We should get more info when high resolution die shots are available for study. Only reason I could see them doing this is for Pro cards. AMD is notoriously stingy with silicon.

Edit: Added this die annotation courtesy of High Yield. Looks like pretty standard GDDR6 PHY’s. Not sure there any evidence of GDDR7 support but I’m by no means an expert.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2549.png
    617.7 KB · Views: 28
Last edited:

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,581
4,066
136
www.teamjuchems.com
My technically astute friend, who annotates die shots, thinks its unlikely Navi 48 has the PHY’s to support GDDR6 and GDDR7. If it does there should be physical evidence, which remains to be seen without better pictures. They’re very different interfaces so it could be a lot of wasted silicon to add both. Unless you had a very good reason.

I’m skeptical that was ever planned for the small monolithic Navi 44 and therefore Navi 48. Probably was for the big chiplet designs. We should get more info when high resolution die shots are available for study. Only reason I could see them doing this is for Pro cards. AMD is notoriously stingy with silicon.

That would also make perfect sense to me… is it really impossible they wouldn’t update/change the memory controllers for a midcycle refresh?

Improbable I’ll grant for sure. But given where the market is and the likely possibility of a validated G7 memory controller for Pro cards existing, it really couldn’t happen?
 
Reactions: Tlh97

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,712
3,345
136
It’s in relation to this on an earlier post: A cube of 9070s in stock at a particular outlet.


No way an employee took the time to make a solid cube of boxes just for a pic. That cube wasn't a cube, but a wall. Just ain't no way. Besides, we saw there wasn't enough stock for people to be making solid cubes anyway. This was a wall launch, not a cube launch.
 

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,983
6,497
136
No way an employee took the time to make a solid cube of boxes just for a pic. That cube wasn't a cube, but a wall. Just ain't no way. Besides, we saw there wasn't enough stock for people to be making solid cubes anyway. This was a wall launch, not a cube launch.
The overachieving marketing employee constructed a hypercube of graphics cards. Imagine all the n-dimensional Navi 48s.
 

marees

Senior member
Apr 28, 2024
880
1,151
96
No way an employee took the time to make a solid cube of boxes just for a pic. That cube wasn't a cube, but a wall. Just ain't no way. Besides, we saw there wasn't enough stock for people to be making solid cubes anyway. This was a wall launch, not a cube launch.
It was a solid cube. The store spent hours arranging a cube.

All stores were asked by AMD to post stock pics & upload to social media

Demand went thru the roof because nv was MIA
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |