...
Toward the end of the hearing, Feinstein turned to Senator Ron Wyden, of Oregon, also a Democrat, who had a final question. The two senators have been friends. Feinstein held a baby shower for Wyden and his wife, Nancy Bass, before the birth of twins, in 2007. But, since then, their increasingly divergent views on intelligence policy have strained the relationship. This is an issue where we just have a difference of opinion, Wyden told me. Feinstein often uses the committee to bolster the tools that spy agencies say they need to protect the country, and Wyden has been increasingly concerned about privacy rights. For almost a decade, he has been trying to force intelligence officials like Clapper to be more forthcoming about spy programs that gather information about Americans who have no connection to terrorism.
Wyden had an uneasy kind of vindication in June, three months after Clappers appearance, when Edward Snowden, a former contractor at the N.S.A., leaked pages and pages of classified N.S.A. documents. They showed that, for the past twelve years, the agency has been running programs that secretly collect detailed information about the phone and Internet usage of Americans.
The programs have been plagued by compliance issues, and the legal arguments justifying the surveillance regime have been kept from view. Wyden has long been aware of the programs and of the agencys appalling compliance record, and has tried everything short of disclosing classified information to warn the public. At the March panel, he looked down at Clapper as if he were about to eat a long-delayed meal.
Wyden estimates that he gets about fifteen minutes a year to ask questions of top intelligence officials at open hearings. With the help of his intelligence staffer, John Dickas, a thirty-five-year-old from Beaverton, Oregon, whom Wyden calls the hero of the intelligence-reform movement, Wyden often spends weeks preparing his questions. He and Dickas look for opportunities to interrogate officials on the gaps between what they say in public and what they say in classified briefings.
At a technology conference in Nevada the previous summer, General Keith Alexander, the director of the N.S.A., had said that the story that we have millions or hundreds of millions of dossiers on people is absolutely false. Wyden told me recently, It sure didnt sound like the world I heard about in private. For months, he tried to get a clarification from the N.S.A. about exactly what Alexander had meant. Now he had the opportunity to ask Clapper in public. As a courtesy, he had sent him the question the day before.
Wyden leaned forward and read Alexanders comment. Then he asked, What I wanted to see is if you could give me a yes or no answer to the question Does the N.S.A. collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?
Clapper slouched in his chair. He touched the fingertips of his right hand to his forehead and made a fist with his left hand.
No, sir, he said. He gave a quick shake of his head and looked down at the table.
It does not? Wyden asked, with exaggerated surprise.
Not wittingly, Clapper replied. He started scratching his forehead and looked away from Wyden. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly.
Wyden told me, The answer was obviously misleading, false. Feinstein said, I was startled by the answer.
...