Okay, so we've heard some people say its for oil.
Here's what Pres. Bush and his Aides have said about the war to this point:
1. We want war because we have proof that Iraq is hiding Chemical and Biological Weapons.
2. Okay, since we can't really prove point 1, we want war because we feel they are in violation of UN Resolution 1441. No matter what they do, they'll still be in violation of Resolution 1441.
3. Hmm, since we don't have enough evidence to support reasons 1 and 2, we now want war because Saddam is helping terrorists. Yeah, that's right, he's on the Terrorists side.
4. Well, since the rest of the UN members don't seem to agree with us on whether Saddam is hiding these weapons, in compliance to article 1441 or helping terrorists, we want war because we have exhausted all diplomacy and war is the only thing left.
5. Wait, we want war because Saddam is a really bad guy and we want to liberate his people.
No, it has nothing to do with oil nor the fact that our economy is going down the toilet and we want to distract the jobless people from protesting our governments lame attempts to unsuccessfully restore the economy. We want war because Saddam is a really bad guy and his people need to be liberated. They will be free when their country is under our control. Yes, under our control equals freedom. That should convince anyone that war is the only solution.
SUMMARY and my point:
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for the war. I think it will help our economy because history has shown that war brings up the economy. I'm sure, the Pres knows this too. I just think Pres. Bush needs to get a better speech writer and stick to one reason because changing stories in the middle just makes his argument weaker!
Here's another thought:
So, this war is to free the people of Iraq from Saddam. Since we're helping people get freedom from dictatorships, does this mean that after this war we will go around to other countries and free those people too? And why not?
Here's what Pres. Bush and his Aides have said about the war to this point:
1. We want war because we have proof that Iraq is hiding Chemical and Biological Weapons.
2. Okay, since we can't really prove point 1, we want war because we feel they are in violation of UN Resolution 1441. No matter what they do, they'll still be in violation of Resolution 1441.
3. Hmm, since we don't have enough evidence to support reasons 1 and 2, we now want war because Saddam is helping terrorists. Yeah, that's right, he's on the Terrorists side.
4. Well, since the rest of the UN members don't seem to agree with us on whether Saddam is hiding these weapons, in compliance to article 1441 or helping terrorists, we want war because we have exhausted all diplomacy and war is the only thing left.
5. Wait, we want war because Saddam is a really bad guy and we want to liberate his people.
No, it has nothing to do with oil nor the fact that our economy is going down the toilet and we want to distract the jobless people from protesting our governments lame attempts to unsuccessfully restore the economy. We want war because Saddam is a really bad guy and his people need to be liberated. They will be free when their country is under our control. Yes, under our control equals freedom. That should convince anyone that war is the only solution.
SUMMARY and my point:
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for the war. I think it will help our economy because history has shown that war brings up the economy. I'm sure, the Pres knows this too. I just think Pres. Bush needs to get a better speech writer and stick to one reason because changing stories in the middle just makes his argument weaker!
Here's another thought:
So, this war is to free the people of Iraq from Saddam. Since we're helping people get freedom from dictatorships, does this mean that after this war we will go around to other countries and free those people too? And why not?