Are those micro management? i really don't want to do stuff like feed/train troops, build towns...etc. I just want to use strategy with basic rules like you would in chess.
I did try Medieval briefly, but its poor graphics was a big turn off, then for some reason i just sucked at it on top of the fact it just didnt feel very strategic to me, like it wasnt accurate or something? i dunno
this genre has always been very popular for some reason, so many strategy games, but unsure if i really have the time to play much...i'm kinda in limbo till some good FPS games come out, likely later this year.
Quick rule of thumb, as someone who has been playing strategy games for 20 years:
The prettier they get, usually the less depth and real-world strategy. Not always, but the popular, glitzy/flashy strategy games generally are made to appeal to wider audience, at the cost of depth, realism, and real-world tactics and strategy.
On the flip side, the games that place a great emphasis on historical accuracy, depth, realism, strategy, and minutiae, do so usually at the expense of accessibility and "noob friendliness".
What you're asking for is tricky: Realism, depth, actual strategy (not click fest, tank rush nonsense), visually pretty, but not too challenging or hard to grasp to a new player.
That's tough.
I would echo some other posters recommendation and say your best bet, by far, is the Total War series. IMO, and I've played them all, they're all enjoyable and offer a tremendous amount of depth for what they are, and for their times, are visually superior to anything in the same genre. Yes, you're going to forfeit some accuracy and realism, but that's just the trade-off.