Nothinman
Elite Member
- Sep 14, 2001
- 30,672
- 0
- 0
Why not dist-upgrade for regular updates? That is what I've always used and have never had a problem.
Mostly because it's not necessary and it's less typing, so why do it? But it is possible for dist-upgrade to remove packages while upgrade will never do that.
upgrade will do only that, if there's packages with newer versions available it'll grab them and that's it. dist-upgrade gives apt permission to upgrade more important packages at the expense of less important ones so if it decides that a less important package needs to be removed (and thus everything that depends on it too) to upgrade the more important one it will.
If you're sticking with stable it probably won't matter a whole lot, but if you're using something that flucuates more like sid you can end up losing half your installation because only a portion of a set of packages made it to your mirror at the time you upgraded.