GasX
Lifer
- Feb 8, 2001
- 29,033
- 6
- 81
That's when you want a cyclocross bike, no?I suppose the advantage is when trying to do cyclo-cross style riding with it, and stability and power delivery become more important?
That's when you want a cyclocross bike, no?I suppose the advantage is when trying to do cyclo-cross style riding with it, and stability and power delivery become more important?
What makes them better? They are 3 times the price and they use an SPD type cleat plus they weigh slightly more than the pedals I bought.
If anything I was thinking I should have gone with the eggbeaters. They have a set of pedals that are markedly lighter than the SPD pedals I bought but only $10 more expensive.
That's when you want a cyclocross bike, no?
Which is why I don't get 29ers.
If a cyclocross bike doesn't cut it, then a 29er will barely be any better.
I guess you get a bit more comfort on the bigger tire and sprung front, and maybe a tiny bit more durability, but in the end you'll be faster most of the time on a CX-bike.
Which is why I don't get 29ers.
If a cyclocross bike doesn't cut it, then a 29er will barely be any better.
Well, the 26er will always be lighter, and therefore quicker up the hill. Wheel and tire weight are what worries me most about 29ers. It's not like 26ers are sprightly on the acceleration, or particularly lightweight.
What I read in the reviews was that the 29er was the better bike to get to the places, where a 26er is fun, which is how you spend most of the time. A CXer just takes that one stop further.
I think in the end, there' one thing about CX, that should make me reject them: They're raced on circuits, with pits. Essentially they're expected to break down over the average outing. And I think that may be a little bit too....adventurous for me.
I'll probably end up with a basic 26" hardtail, if I get a job before winter. With an eye on keeping the weight around 10 kilos.
What's the general opinion on CF frames for MTBs? I'm always a bit worried about durability, and I already dented my road bikes frame, which would have probably totaled a CF frame. On the other hand MTB frames should be slightly more resistant to off-angle forces, as crashing out on them happens more regularly...
I'm not afraid to drop 2k euro on a decent bike if it saves me 2 kilos over a 1k bike, if both last ~ 5 years of "caring but rough" use.
Also, I'm not much into downhill racing either. Always prefer a nice physical climb, and the way down is just that awkward, dangerous bit necessary to get home again - or to the next climb. Of course, that may be just the roadie in me talking.
Well, the 26er will always be lighter, and therefore quicker up the hill. Wheel and tire weight are what worries me most about 29ers. It's not like 26ers are sprightly on the acceleration, or particularly lightweight.
What I read in the reviews was that the 29er was the better bike to get to the places, where a 26er is fun, which is how you spend most of the time. A CXer just takes that one stop further.
I think in the end, there' one thing about CX, that should make me reject them: They're raced on circuits, with pits. Essentially they're expected to break down over the average outing. And I think that may be a little bit too....adventurous for me.
I'll probably end up with a basic 26" hardtail, if I get a job before winter. With an eye on keeping the weight around 10 kilos.
What's the general opinion on CF frames for MTBs? I'm always a bit worried about durability, and I already dented my road bikes frame, which would have probably totaled a CF frame. On the other hand MTB frames should be slightly more resistant to off-angle forces, as crashing out on them happens more regularly...
I'm not afraid to drop 2k euro on a decent bike if it saves me 2 kilos over a 1k bike, if both last ~ 5 years of "caring but rough" use.
Also, I'm not much into downhill racing either. Always prefer a nice physical climb, and the way down is just that awkward, dangerous bit necessary to get home again - or to the next climb. Of course, that may be just the roadie in me talking.
I've been riding road bikes for years and I love bombing down steep hills. The faster the better. I've hit 48mph on a steep decent on my road bike. :biggrin:
As for the 29er, I really like the way it rolls over rocks, ruts and uneven trails and didn't really notice that I was slower on the climbs. I'm not racing anyone so who cares if I get to the top first? Plus, I'm riding with guys with 29ers so we're all on about the same equipment anyway.
I've been riding road bikes for years and I love bombing down steep hills. The faster the better. I've hit 48mph on a steep decent on my road bike. :biggrin:
The Canyon looks pretty good to me other than the brakes. Don't care for Avids which are what I have on my own bike. They are a PITA to bleed and seem to need it all the time. Plan to pick up a set of shimano SLX or XT brakes at soon. I don't see a single 26er hard tail listed in their 2014 preview. You would think somebody would want to fill in that niche since everybody else seems to be dropping out of it and lots of people still prefer 26ers.
I try to live by the famous quote "Don't buy upgrades. Ride grades."
I will admit I am liking those wheels though. Maybe if I start racing I'll look into some myself. A pound off the wheels would definitely help over the course of a good ride.
Man, I'm beat. Just got back from Newport... tons of hills and trails today. The climbing killed me but bombing down the hills was great fun, even got some air over a few little jumps. The wheels held up fine and probably made climbing just a little bit easier but ultimately it is me that needs to improve, the bike is only as capable as I am. I have no idea how far we rode but we were out there a couple hours and it was very warm with full sun.
1. Wearing a helmet for just easy riding around is totally up to you.
2. $10 combo bike locks are fine
3. put the lock through the frame, between the top and bottom.