Originally posted by: ZootyGray
Originally posted by: Pale Rider
I'm curious to see if anyone is reconsidering the Phenom now that multiple hardware sites have them running at 3.5 GHz on air with the "new" south bridge.
I would like to see some performance numbers posted but no one has so far (including AT).
I really have to disagree with too many of you. Unbelievable!!!!
THIS THREAD clearly, if you read the OP, is NOT ABOUT INTEL AT ALL.
This is about Phenom:
= "I would like to see some performance numbers posted but no one has so far."
= "Phenom now that multiple hardware sites have them running at 3.5 GHz".
= "running at 3.5 GHz on air with the "new" south bridge".
= "with the "new" south bridge"
THIS OP IS ALL ABOUT PHENOM!!!!
ANYTHING INTEL is simply off-topic!!!!
Pardon me; but I really value the ENGLISH language. If you are so illiterate as to believe that this is, IN ANY WAY, about intel crawp - then I have no additional time to waste trying to convince you otherwise.
You can justify FLAMEWAR all you like - flamers need no justification. It's all bs. So thank you very little for trashing a thread that's clearly
(if you speekada eengleeeshh)
all about AMD recent news about PHENOM
and the best test report is RIGHT HERE ON ANANDTECH. (hello?)
- I don't need your illiterate apologies either - but I would like to be able to discuss the AMD PHENOM without disruption.
And that is clearly impossible in THIS HIJACKKEDD THREAD - thank you very little mr moderator, SIR (salutes der geshtapoh and walks away in disgust)
I readily cop to my mistakes - but not this. This is all yours to decipher - hint - it's in code - real esoteric stuff.
I bet you think I have a bad attitude also. You a shrink? Get away from me, cos I did not ask for that. That's all your problem. You think I am supposed to like it?
Read it ALL again for the first time >>> Then have a flame party - at your own expense, not mine.
(leaves knowing the illiterates in the group will find a way to justify continuance of same)
(somebody had the audacity to utter the word "objective") (my opinion of 'objective' is already subjective) (don't think too hard about this)
I feel like I should apologize for somebody elses problem; but the problem is I already dealt with my codependency issues. So it's all yours. You see, I truly DO NOT CARE. Thx for your help "brother".