Bitek
Lifer
- Aug 2, 2001
- 10,658
- 5,228
- 136
Yes. Yes it is. Very selfish of Trump.
Probably. Incompetent would be my word
Last edited:
Yes. Yes it is. Very selfish of Trump.
Here is link to that:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...pay-federal-workers-amid-shutdown/2439801002/
It said that the military won't be affected.
Remember he just got done telling the serciemen and women, he he gave them a 10% raise, which of course was another lie.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...theyve-not-been-given/?utm_term=.eb0bc283a321
Lindsey Graham seems to be trying to engineer a deal for $5B in border security/wall money for DACA eligibles and TPS recipients.
Anything short of citizenship for all DACA eligibles and permanent status for TPS people is going to be one hell of a difficult sell to the Democrats at this point. Also any deal would have to include some kind of fail safe when Trump tries to piss backwards through some sort of administrative fuckery like he's trying with the SNAP program. This is the problem when dealing with a fundamentally untrustworthy person who will do anything, deals are harder to close because nobody can take your word.
Lindsey Graham seems to be trying to engineer a deal for $5B in border security/wall money for DACA eligibles and TPS recipients.
Anything short of citizenship for all DACA eligibles and permanent status for TPS people is going to be one hell of a difficult sell to the Democrats at this point. Also any deal would have to include some kind of fail safe when Trump tries to piss backwards through some sort of administrative fuckery like he's trying with the SNAP program. This is the problem when dealing with a fundamentally untrustworthy person who will do anything, deals are harder to close because nobody can take your word.
Citizenship is a reasonable price.
Trump was the one who blew up the DACA program in the first place in his failed hostage taking gambit, so merely returning to the status quo is not acceptable.
If a wall is good enough for "those" people, why isn't good enough for mighty whitey?
lol.
Probably a SS requirement. Doesn't stop Hillary from trafficking humans through it though.If the Obamas can have a wall to keep out the right wing nut jobs then America needs one, too. I mean, Mexico is full of them, you know?
It looks more like 8', anyway, if that-
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...lding-wall-Obamas-new-Washington-DC-home.html
Between Obama's name and Putin's dick, I don't see how he has any room in his mouth to be able to speak!
If a wall is good enough for "those" people, why isn't good enough for mighty whitey?
lol.
Probably a SS requirement. Doesn't stop Hillary from trafficking humans through it though.
Between Obama's name and Putin's dick, I don't see how he has any room in his mouth to be able to speak!
If a wall is good enough for "those" people, why isn't good enough for mighty whitey?
lol.
Lindsey Graham seems to be trying to engineer a deal for $5B in border security/wall money for DACA eligibles and TPS recipients.
Anything short of citizenship for all DACA eligibles and permanent status for TPS people is going to be one hell of a difficult sell to the Democrats at this point. Also any deal would have to include some kind of fail safe when Trump tries to piss backwards through some sort of administrative fuckery like he's trying with the SNAP program. This is the problem when dealing with a fundamentally untrustworthy person who will do anything, deals are harder to close because nobody can take your word.
No, but you can send your bitch.
View attachment 2018