Summary
I said I was going to make this topic and do some comparisons so here it is!Quad Cores:
i7-3700 @ 3.4ghz w/ hyper-threading - 4 minutes
i7-3570k @ 3.4ghz - 8 minutes 40 seconds
A10-5800k @ 3.8ghz - 13 minutes 17 seconds
Core 2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.3ghz - 17 minutes 26 seconds.
Dual Cores:
Core 2 Duo T7200 (mobile CPU) @ 2.0ghz - 28 minutes
AMD X2 4000+ @ 2.1ghz - 45 minutes
Core Duo T2500 (mobile CPU) @ 2.0ghz - 52 minutes
Avidemux/Handbrake Settings:
Output - Mpeg4 (x264) - Quality @ 18.
Audio - Copy
Container - .Mkv
Priority - Normal
- encoding 13 minute long 17gb raw Starcraft 2 footage.
There is no debate that more cores help with multi-threaded tasks like video rendering. How big are improvements from a dual core to a quad core and architecture improvement..? Time to do some real world tests!
I will be comparing some old and newer CPUs to see how the cores and architecture really help for render times.
For the tests I am using...
Windows 7 64 bit, Mac OS X, and Linux.
Avidemux or Handbrake
My own footage
No other programs running to disrupt tests.
---
The first battle is between the i5 3570k @ stock clocks vs an AMD X2 4000+ at stock clocks.
The 3570k is recording to a 7200 RPM SATA 3 WD Black 1TB.
The AMD X2 4000+ is recording to a 7200 RPM IDE Samsung 200gb.
Last edited: