Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Can't say that I'd feel bad if a worthless site like 4chan was blocked. It does more harm than good.
What religion are you? Or are you agnostic? Whatever your beliefs, I wouldnt feel bad outlawing it, because it does more harm than good. And it doesnt affect me anyway.
See where Im going here?
Well I'm not saying that we should establish the precedent that blocking sites is OK for ISPs.
But how many crimes or threatened crimes come out because of 4chan. It's a bunch of worthless people with no life congregating, which is never a good thing. Hacking email accounts of politicians, "attacking" people and other sites and causing them hell, posting threats that always have to be taken seriously and end up wasting my money on a police investigation. They deserve to be taken down and prosecuted for what they have done.
And I'm not religious.
Crimes? None that Im aware of. Threats of crime? Shit man theres threats of crime on THIS site almost every day. How about we nationally block radical islamic websites hmm?
Hacking into a governor's email account and posting the password on the internet? Threatening to blow up a school? Indentity theft as you yourself posted above.... "
There is a current raid thread on /b/ right now against the guy who unleashed DDoS attacks on 4chan last night after the ban was lifted. Pics, address, name, phone numbers, and IP addys. He's fucked.
edit: they just posted his SSN...
That is a crime if you're not aware. These kind of people are scum. Just because they do it over the Internet doesn't mean it is any better. There is a difference between association as guaranteed by the constitution and what these people are doing.
You, sir, are an idiot. Palins email was not hacked by 4chan. It was hacked by ONE person, who may or may not be a posted on 4chan. 4chan, or "anon", has not been implicated in the hacking. Unless theres another incedent your talking about?
How many people on AT have commited a crime? 4chan is a message board for Christ's sake. It's members make the site, but it stands as a messageboard. Do you think AT should be censored by ISP's because a few of its members are pedophiles? Or rapists? Or murderers? Hmm?
Sure. There is some sick stuff posted on /b/. But you know what? If anything illegal (illegal being the key word) is posted, its removed. You obviously have no clue what free speech is. People like you would be great directors in a country like China. Or Iran.
edit: and BTW...posting a SSN is NOT illegal.