Republicans need to apologize

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
I would recommend getting skills that will allow you to get a job that has medical already taken care of. Thats the republican plan. And dont get sick.

Actually Employer provided insurance started during WWII under democrats, but that is just a detail. And no, that is not the republican plan. Employer provided benefits need to disappear and be replaced with inexpensive catastrophic plans. Prepaid health care is not insurance.

And typically I do have such benefits, but occasionally it does not work out that way. This the 2nd time in 20+ years.
 

wetech

Senior member
Jul 16, 2002
871
6
81
Well ACA plan which I shopped around for, I am out about $20k before the insurance covers anything. So you tell me the value of that insurance? I would need to have a catastrophic event about every 5 years for me to break even.


It's valuable to the people you're subsidizing.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
Actually Employer provided insurance started during WWII under democrats, but that is just a detail. And no, that is not the republican plan. Employer provided benefits need to disappear and be replaced with inexpensive catastrophic plans. Prepaid health care is not insurance.

And typically I do have such benefits, but occasionally it does not work out that way. This the 2nd time in 20+ years.


Your idea about what insurance should be is so far out in left field it will never come to be. We will go single payer. Because thats the system that works around the world. And your ass is too poor to benefit from the alternative.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Your idea about what insurance should be is so far out in left field it will never come to be. We will go single payer. Because thats the system that works around the world. And your ass is too poor to benefit from the alternative.


Actually it is not out in left field. Health care is no where near a free market solution and it gives us the worst of both words(socialized and freemarket). Single payer has it own issues and you only need to look at any country that has implemented it. Insurance is expensive here because we use it as prepaid heath care, not insurance. This needs to change if we ever hope to bring cost under control.

And no I am not poor, the value is just is not there for what I am getting.
 

Bart*Simpson

Senior member
Jul 21, 2015
604
4
36
www.canadaka.net
I'm still waiting for Republicans to apologize for GWBush.

Why? Your stupid fucking 'genius' Al Gore LOST to Bush. If Bush was so bad than Gore was a schlemiel for losing to him. Blame Gore. If that dumfuck hadn't insisted on making gun control such a big deal he'd have carried West Virginia and his home state of Tennessee and won the election regardless of Florida.

We don't apologize for our victories.

That's what you people and your soon-to-be-gone Obama do.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
Actually it is not out in left field. Health care is no where near a free market solution and it gives us the worst of both words(socialized and freemarket). Single payer has it own issues and you only need to look at any country that has implemented it. Insurance is expensive here because we use it as prepaid heath care, not insurance. This needs to change if we ever hope to bring cost under control.

And no I am not poor, the value is just is not there for what I am getting.


There is no free market on health. For instance if you were having a heart attack you would pay anything to have it fixed in that moment. Left to the free markets people would sign away everything they own to get serviced for the heart attack that is happening right now.

Your ideas are dumb and you are poor. I pay more in taxes every week then your monthly health nut. Go get a job with real benefits.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
Why? Your stupid fucking 'genius' Al Gore LOST to Bush. If Bush was so bad than Gore was a schlemiel for losing to him. Blame Gore. If that dumfuck hadn't insisted on making gun control such a big deal he'd have carried West Virginia and his home state of Tennessee and won the election regardless of Florida.

We don't apologize for our victories.

That's what you people and your soon-to-be-gone Obama do.

GW bush = A victory.

buhahahaahahahahahahahahahahahaha
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,113
925
126
An apology might have been warranted, but you guys put up Romney to run against him. You see, the way it works, is if the Democrats have a bad or unpopular candidate running, you can't just put up any garbage and expect it to win - we kind of expect you to keep up your end and give us a decent alternative.

Well, shit...you do have a valid point! Stop making sense!!!
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
There is no free market on health. For instance if you were having a heart attack you would pay anything to have it fixed in that moment. Left to the free markets people would sign away everything they own to get serviced for the heart attack that is happening right now.

Your ideas are dumb and you are poor. I pay more in taxes every week then your monthly health nut. Go get a job with real benefits.

And that is exactly what insurance is for. The expensive and unexpected, not the common and routine. Insurance should not cover things that are inexpensive and routine, injecting a 3rd party into such transactions only makes them more expensive.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
And that is exactly what insurance is for. The expensive and unexpected, not the common and routine. Insurance should not cover things that are inexpensive and routine, injecting a 3rd party into such transactions only makes them more expensive.

Yeah but that's not really how health expenditures come out. Basically if you're old or if you've come down with a persistent medical condition you are very expensive. Everyone else is very cheap. Of course insurers figured this out a long time ago, which is why they made getting private insurance either impossible or incredibly expensive if you were old or sick. This is why we are where we are, after all.

It's not like we are spending all our health care money on routine things. While I support an HSA model coupled with national universal catastrophic insurance let's not fool ourselves into thinking that's suddenly going to fix health care cost inflation.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,606
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Well ACA plan which I shopped around for, I am out about $20k before the insurance covers anything. So you tell me the value of that insurance? I would need to have a catastrophic event about every 5 years for me to break even.
LOL!!! You're paying less than $10k per year. Let's say you're in a car accident and have to be flown by helicopter. That ride alone is $15,000 or more. You apparently have no clue how much it costs in the case of a catastrophic event. One of my coworker's son and girlfriend were in a car accident. His bills were in the hundreds of thousands of dollars - hers are over a million dollars now. Both are extremely lucky to be alive. Fortunately, such accidents aren't too common. But, guess what - if you take the costs versus risk and divide it among everyone, then it's going to cost you about $10k per year to cover those costs, not to mention cover the profits of the insurance companies.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
LOL!!! You're paying less than $10k per year. Let's say you're in a car accident and have to be flown by helicopter. That ride alone is $15,000 or more. You apparently have no clue how much it costs in the case of a catastrophic event. One of my coworker's son and girlfriend were in a car accident. His bills were in the hundreds of thousands of dollars - hers are over a million dollars now. Both are extremely lucky to be alive. Fortunately, such accidents aren't too common. But, guess what - if you take the costs versus risk and divide it among everyone, then it's going to cost you about $10k per year to cover those costs, not to mention cover the profits of the insurance companies.

You miss the point, that is what insurance is for. It is not for every trip to the doc for a runny nose. Insurance is for the catastrophic, not the common.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Yeah but that's not really how health expenditures come out. Basically if you're old or if you've come down with a persistent medical condition you are very expensive. Everyone else is very cheap. Of course insurers figured this out a long time ago, which is why they made getting private insurance either impossible or incredibly expensive if you were old or sick. This is why we are where we are, after all.

It's not like we are spending all our health care money on routine things. While I support an HSA model coupled with national universal catastrophic insurance let's not fool ourselves into thinking that's suddenly going to fix health care cost inflation.

And Docs also figures out a long time ago that they can bill the insurance companies what ever they want, since the consumer is not the one paying the bill. Price transparency and HSA would go a long way to solving the current price spiral.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
And Docs also figures out a long time ago that they can bill the insurance companies what ever they want, since the consumer is not the one paying the bill. Price transparency and HSA would go a long way to solving the current price spiral.

I assure you that the insurance companies very much care what the doctor bills. That aside, I agree that improved price transparency would be absolutely beneficial, which is one of the good things included in the affordable care act. That being said, a huge amount of health care spending isn't really amenable to the effects of pricing transparency. Do you think someone in a car accident is going to shop around for the best ambulance price? Is someone half dead from cancer in a position to research and evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of various lab providers? Of course not.

Every little bit helps and I do agree with both the HSA/catastrophic combination as a good health care model and efforts to improve shopping around/price transparency. I just don't think they are actually going to solve the problem.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
I assure you that the insurance companies very much care what the doctor bills. That aside, I agree that improved price transparency would be absolutely beneficial, which is one of the good things included in the affordable care act. That being said, a huge amount of health care spending isn't really amenable to the effects of pricing transparency. Do you think someone in a car accident is going to shop around for the best ambulance price? Is someone half dead from cancer in a position to research and evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of various lab providers? Of course not.

I have used an HSA twice and I can tell you providers try to bill for whatever they can get. Yes insurance does try to mitigate that, but there still is quite a bit graft in the process.

I would guess that 90% of medical transaction are not made under such duress and a consumer can shop around, for everything else there is catastrophic insurance.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
I have used an HSA twice and I can tell you providers try to bill for whatever they can get. Yes insurance does try to mitigate that, but there still is quite a bit graft in the process.

Of course providers try to bill for whatever you can get. Insurance companies are much better at getting better prices than individuals are. It's kind of their whole business, after all.

I would guess that 90% of medical transaction are not made under such duress and a consumer can shop around, for everything else there is catastrophic insurance.

Remember, 5% of customers account for approximately 50% of health care spending. These are often people with multiple intersecting problems and myriad tests, medications, procedures, etc happening on a regular basis. Unless our plan is that these individuals devote massive time and effort to shopping around (which carries its own huge opportunity costs) this should not be expected. It's just not an efficient process.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Of course providers try to bill for whatever you can get. Insurance companies are much better at getting better prices than individuals are. It's kind of their whole business, after all.

And I have also found cash prices without insurance are often less expensive than with insurance for common things. I would point to places like the surgical center of OK that does major surgical procedures for less than peoples copay at a normal hospital. This is real thing.

Remember, 5% of customers account for approximately 50% of health care spending. These are often people with multiple intersecting problems and myriad tests, medications, procedures, etc happening on a regular basis. Unless our plan is that these individuals devote massive time and effort to shopping around (which carries its own huge opportunity costs) this should not be expected. It's just not an efficient process.

And this does not disagree with what i stated about 90% of medical transactions not being under duress.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,820
29,571
146
You miss the point, that is what insurance is for. It is not for every trip to the doc for a runny nose. Insurance is for the catastrophic, not the common.

Uh, and you pay for the common because it only takes one catastrophy to bankrupt you. This is how all insurance works.

Any type of insurance can always be considered a scam until the single moment that it isn't.

Also, if you are going to the doctor for a runny nose, then you are doing healthcare wrong; and you would be, in fact, a main reason that costs are ridiculous for everyone.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
And I have also found cash prices without insurance are often less expensive than with insurance for common things. I would point to places like the surgical center of OK that does major surgical procedures for less than peoples copay at a normal hospital. This is real thing.

As someone who has had a great deal more interaction with the medical community than I would like both with and without insurance I can say I have rarely found that to be the case. I'm sure it's the case sometimes, but that's again a marginal effect.

And this does not disagree with what i stated about 90% of medical transactions not being under duress.

Yes but it does disagree with the larger point of people dedicating themselves to shopping around as an effective means of health care cost control. I'm sure it will help at the margins, but it's not a solution. It also incurs significant opportunity costs which need to be accounted for.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
15,785
1,500
126
I'd like to see a statistical analysis of instances where the Tea Party Congress cooperated or supported with Obama, versus those instances when they didn't.

Just for being a media sponge like all people necessarily are, my impression has been that they opposed him at every turn. And when he attempted to get things done through executive order -- with fewer executive orders than had been historically evident with other presidents -- they raised opposition to that.

What is my point? Can you guess?

The point is this. You can be right about some things some of the time. You can be wrong about some things some of the time. But you can't be right about everything all of the time.

Therefore, it proves out the sordid underbelly of the more committed GOP supporters and elected officials, who will deny exactly what I'm implying here.

"Oh na-na-NO! The Na-na-na-N----- ga-gonna ma-mess with mah health care! The Na-na-N----- gonna give up our Roman Empire impositions in the Middle East! The Na-na-N----- drew a line in the sand and then backed off! The Na-na-N----- doesn't want to buy in to an apocalyptic conflict of religions and call it Rad-I-cal IS-Lam-ic Ter-ror-ism!

"The na-na-N----- doesn't look like me! The na-na-N----- is an Affirmative Action President who got through Harvard without putting in the effort! The na-na-N----- was born in KINN-YA!"

And for most of you folks whining about the "Liberal Media" -- it's a myth. Some myths may be partly true, but they aren't accurate. You think that propaganda is just "something in print." FALSE.

In a scholarly study of the subject going back to Goebbels and Harold Laswell, it is intricately bound up in a field we call "psychological warfare."

So the practice requires the creation of an event or its management, with a "story" about it. In the recent cases, four people are killed in Libya after Bush caused 4,000+ troops to die and tens-thousands more to be crippled in an unnecessary war. Suddenly, the fly-in-the-ointment is a Godzilla fly, with Representative Goudy and the other perpetrators of the "Pillory-Hillary committee investigation" continued to bang the gong. It leads to the e-mail scandal, when the number of "sensitive" e-mails was such a small fraction of the total that a GE production manager seeing the same QC numbers on light-bulb shipments would count on the collapse of Sylvania.

But, repeat it enough, people will believe it. Hillary's a Liar? Trump's the biggest Liar in human history!

You'll never get an apology from these folks. But the same folks should understand this: Obama, when he took office, just let the Bush/Cheney fiasco slide.

I would've given 'em 99 years in the electric chair, and then a fair trial!

Oh. And one more. They're saying that Comey's conclusions and DOJ's failure to "prosecute" Clinton shows the system is "rigged." They're whining about objectivity and reality. There's no "there . . . there."

Now let's wait and see what happens to those Criminals in the Flint, Michigan Fiasco. I'd say 99 years in the electric chair with that one is about right.
 
Last edited:

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,722
6,201
126
I would've given 'em 99 years in the electric chair, and then a fair trial!

That is some rage you have there. Imagine the emotional . magnitude of what it would be if you had to forgive them because they had no idea of what they did. You know their guilt. History will too. Grace is found in surrender hidden under grief.
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,022
2,872
136
It would be good if a whole lot of people and organizations disclosed their failings, apologized, and participated in actions demonstrating assumption of responsibility for their contributions to failings in life.

I am concerned that demanding such behavior from others includes disavowal of one's own contributions to these failings, and I am struggling to reject the notion of forgiving a disavowal defense on the basis that one's own contributions to an unpleasant reality are less than another's, regardless of the degree of imbalance.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
15,785
1,500
126
That is some rage you have there. Imagine the emotional . magnitude of what it would be if you had to forgive them because they had no idea of what they did. You know their guilt. History will too. Grace is found in surrender hidden under grief.

Moonbeam! So Christian of you! I can buy it. But I'm not running for office. Point is, as much as "my party" practices MLK's view of things, I feel like John Brown in the 21st century.

But here's the underlying crux of the insanity going forward. I choose Senator Joanie Ernst in her convention remarks to explain it.

She said we shouldn't say that a war was a mistake, because it shows disrespect to our troops.

And basically, what she means by it even if she didn't think about what it meant, is that it's OK to plan the future and base a great nation's history in a Lie.

We've been at that crossroads too many times before. And the assholes never admit their mistakes. Instead, you "can't apologize for America, you can't blame America, you can't find fault with America."

If you don't find the faults, you can't fix them.

The troops deserve GREATER respect for making a sacrifice in a worthless war arranged by a worthless presidency.

Also, this wider view of things is about public opinion, which has an emotional and even irrational basis. There is one Lie in particular that intrigues me, even for being 53 years old. It still comes up as a talking point in the political conversation -- most recently, pertaining to Cruz's father.

I'll stop with that.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,722
6,201
126
BonZaiDuck, I do not think you can transfer the pain of one lie by conjuring up another. The nation, the congress and the Executive branch wanted a lie to go to war because they could not accept to pain. Now they want a lie to keep from feeling our guilt. To lie again would be to say we are responsible for our crimes. How can you blame anybody for being unaware of what motivates them. There is noting we can do but as individuals offer up our pain on the alter of Love. It is the only death that changes everything.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
15,785
1,500
126
BonZaiDuck, I do not think you can transfer the pain of one lie by conjuring up another. The nation, the congress and the Executive branch wanted a lie to go to war because they could not accept to pain. Now they want a lie to keep from feeling our guilt. To lie again would be to say we are responsible for our crimes. How can you blame anybody for being unaware of what motivates them. There is noting we can do but as individuals offer up our pain on the alter of Love. It is the only death that changes everything.

I'm trying to decipher your remark here, because I consider it worthwhile.

I've had a friend tell me recently, after I gave him a paper I'd written about the Great Lie I only implied in my post. It insinuated a simple application of predicate logic -- there are inferences, but only inferences used in the "discovery of evidence." He was only half-serious, suggesting that certain 19th century intellects had argued that "it's impossible to prove anything."

As a practical person, I can't buy that. Things happen in only one way. And sometimes, the prevailing understanding of public opinion clings to a fantasy explanation or a myth.

Somehow, with high-school provided by Jesuits and then through college, I came to the view that the Truth is more important than anything.

Therefore, public policy, public opinion, the future path of history and the decision-making that chooses that path is wrong or simply disastrous if the Lies prevail.

So I'll say I'm an advocate for the Truth first; a Citizen of the World second; a Citizen of the USA third.

If people are "unaware" of what motivates them, then they should become aware. There's an underlying mass psychology, and we're all a part of it. There are various mass psychologies -- take for instance the citizens of Ferguson. I think Darren Wilson was a casualty. But the underlying problems in Ferguson had to be exposed.

We live in a narcissistic culture, steeped in the mythology of the rugged Individual and our individuality. This is why propaganda campaigns work. "I'm smart. I'm an individual. I'm not average. I'm not part of an 'average of the mass.' I can't be fooled."

So -- they're fooled.

I'd like to see a few things taught at the high-school level. An introduction to symbolic logic or something like predicate calculus, together with statistics and probability. It would be a stretch to provide a course in media and public opinion. People might say that it's "political indoctrination."

Ignorance is Bliss. I'd like to see more dissatisfied and unhappy people, because things would change more quickly for the better.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |