Remember now that this is the same group of apes that forced their way into Terri Shiavo's life forcing a feeding tube on her and their views upon her family. If this isn't an intrusion I don't know what is. They claim they want less government regulation but then their actions betray their words.
Let's examine the situation surrounding your sort in more detail. Had they succeeded much academically, they wouldn't be attracted to the right wing agitprop that blames the education system for their failures. These are the same sources that tell them they're the smart ones despite all evidence to the contrary, so it's no mystery why simpletons who aren't exactly accused of intellect are drawn to these empty compliments in exchange for their loyalty. All the teachers in school evaluate them as dummies, but what do schools and teachers know.
As a result your type is basically stuck aggrandizing an ideology for backwards thinkers, given it's the only way they're ever to going to feel intellectually competent.
The War Against Boys
This we think we know: American schools favor boys and grind down girls. The truth is the very opposite. By virtually every measure, girls are thriving in school; it is boys who are the second sex
This sort of vague description shows you're not very good with quantities so it's no great leap to deduce whatever else is based on that lack of competence is worthless.All evidence to the contrary? Again with your stupid cluelessness, despite me pointing out that boys get better test scores yet lag behind on grades.
If the shoe was on the other foot, feminists would have burned the schools down. But despite that feminists criticise schooling system for not doing enough and their lying has been criticised by such 'right-wing agitprop' spreaders like Judith Kleinfeld(whom I quoted before) and Christina Hoff Sommers who really took it to them in her book and became a persona non grata in feminist circles.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-against-boys/304659/
Before examining the situation surrounding me in more detail, where your prediction missed by a couple of miles, it'd behoove you to read. And comprehend.
This sort of vague description shows you're not very good with quantities so it's no great leap to deduce whatever else is based on that lack of competence is worthless.
Take note that Sommers' paycheck is predicated on arguing that position.
Rather comical you complain of social science academics then offer the one who might agree with you and think tank staff as the honest alternative.
hahaha, 'vague description' he says, what a joke.
Her husband earns enough. She got into it because she has a couple of sons. A similar reason to Kleinfeld.
Rather comical how you deflect from the 'right-wing' nonsense upthread. It's always amusing to see you guys slither from one position to the other just as I mentioned in the 'hypocrisy' thread.
It's why it's a fucking waste to bother with you guys. Except for the lulz.
People would be more convinced of whatever you're trying to say if you could construct some sort of coherent argument.
People? Like you? Don't flatter yourself.
Moot thread is moot
Yes, for example the argument that the lowly educated trump sorts here post exactly like you.
Lowly educated? You are again bloody clueless.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/applying-occams-razor-vs-asserting-occams-racist/
You write/think more or less like Ooorooo or AnonymouseUser. Think about that for a while.
Sure, it'd still be better than comprehending your cluelessless.
Hardly. Just reverse the thread title. Not only did they lose the Senate but now the supreme Court. Fuck them.Moot thread is moot
Don't worry, they can't comprehend what I say either.
Can't comprehend or don't accept your BS? I suspect it's the later
They aren't forgoing much of importance.
Comprehend this, we won, you lost. Now go back to your regressive cave and reflect on your dismissive attitude. Come back in 4 years with something other than calling everybody who disagrees with you a racist, or sexist, or stupid or deplorable. Maybe then we'll invite you in from the cold. Till then, fuck off.Your friends aren't exactly known for comprehension skills.
Not really saying much given the kind of material you or they post as "important".
LMAO!!!! I don't have any friends on here. I guess you're not as smart as you think you are and why many reject your BS.Your friends aren't exactly known for comprehension skills.
Comprehend this, we won, you lost. Now go back to your regressive cave and reflect on your dismissive attitude. Come back in 4 years with something other than calling everybody who disagrees with you a racist, or sexist, or stupid or deplorable. Maybe then we'll invite you in from the cold. Till then, fuck off.
LMAO!!!! I don't have any friends on here. I guess you're not as smart as you think you are and why many reject your BS.
I haven't posted in here in months and never replied to any of those you speaking of in this thread. But keep on thinking you're all knowing and wise even though it's just more of the BS you espouse in here.If only you were quite a bit smarter it would be clear that's a euphemism for people you agree with a lot.
I haven't posted in here in months and never replied to any of those you speaking of in this thread. But keep on thinking you're all knowing and wise even though it's just more of the BS you espouse in here.