No, I think the cover up was simply trying to avoid blame for a failure right before an election.
Potentially there could be more to this story a la Iran Contra, and we may never know what really happened.
No matter what, Susan Rice has a security clearance sufficient to have access to both the classified report and the unclassified report. I believe she knew on Sunday she was lying.
1. His administration messed up in Benghazi. How or why, it's taking a long time to figure out – because the White House isn't super keen to talk about it. Only on Sunday did the President admit there had been some “sloppiness” in the handling of this terrorist attack, which is a slight upgrade from his earlier verdict of “not optimal.” The three things we do know for certain are: a) four Americans were killed, b) the cause of their deaths was misrepresented by the administration, and c) the President went fundraising in Las Vegas just one day later. No, it's not very “optimal” at all.
It even gets mentioned in this Telegraph article.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/t...ama-did-in-2012-besides-winning-the-election/
Only the foreign press is talking about Obama fuck-ups in Benghazi.
Oh was that Obamas doing now?
Hilarious that you can't tell the difference between "foreign press" and a blog hosted by a UK tabloid. Seems there's no bottom you won't feed from to reinforce your rage. I see he also wrote about Saint Nick and the Mayans. What was their role in Benghazi?It even gets mentioned in this Telegraph article.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/t...ama-did-in-2012-besides-winning-the-election/
Even the foreign press is talking about Obama fuck-ups in Benghazi.
Hilarious that you can't tell the difference between "foreign press" and a blog hosted by a UK tabloid. Seems there's no bottom you won't feed from to reinforce your rage. I see he also wrote about Saint Nick and the Mayans. What was their role in Benghazi?
You've become a self-parody.
Obama is the only one who can exert executive privilege for work product, correct?
You're still the pathetic little ass kisser that you've always been Bow. You'll tell any lie rather than admit that Obama made serious mistakes in Libya.
You're still the pathetic little ass kisser that you've always been Bow. You'll tell any lie rather than admit that Obama made serious mistakes in Libya.
I have no idea what you are saying.
Says the guy that has yet to produce any evidence showing a cover up or any political motivated maneuvering.
Did the Obama make serious mistakes in Libya? Just asking.
I have no idea what you are saying.
Says the guy that has yet to produce any evidence showing a cover up or any political motivated maneuvering.
Is there anyone else in the administration besides Barack Obama who can use executive privilege? It's an irrelevant question.
Is there anyone else in the administration besides Barack Obama who can use executive privilege? It's a simple question.
Did Obama make a mistake? No. Were there things that could have been done to prevent the tragedy? Yes. Was any one person responsible? No. Is it something we should learn from? Yes. Was there a cover up? No.
And even if there were mistakes made that Obama is directly responsible for does that mean he tried to cover it up? No.
You've got nothing and it's best if you just moved on.
You and the small number of partisan deniers in this forum are among the few people in the world that think Obama and his administration didn't make serious errors in Benghazi. Knock yourself out whining about the coverage of his failure and keep posting in this thread.
Yep! You still have nothing.
When in doubt yell, "liberal" or "partisan, to deflect. You are a tool. You happily recite talking points from the right without ever questioning them. Nice job parrot!
(Reuters) - The State Department made a "grievous mistake" in keeping the U.S. mission in Benghazi open despite inadequate security and increasingly alarming threat assessments in the weeks before a deadly attack by militants, a Senate committee said on Monday.
404 lie not found, wimps still won't man up with evidence of lies.
Even the Obama State Department finds there were systemic failures by the Obama State Department. A Senate committee agrees that Obama's State Department made grievous errors in Benghazi. It's not even debatable, why do you and the handful of other partisan Democrat extremist posters even try to absolve Obama of responsibility in the matter? You are just proving and then re-enforcing the fact that you and every partisan Democrat that posts in this thread is a fucking lying idiot.
They have admitted they made errors, why are you trying to debate it?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS...k-report-finds/story?id=18012210#.UONAeqwu3-8
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/01/us-usa-benghazi-report-senate-idUSBRE8BU07L20130101
The lie has already been pointed out numerous times that the Obama administration lied to the American public about it being a protest against the video instead of an organized terrorist attack on 9-11 in Benghazi.
You're just lying about the lie.
Are you retarded or just hard headed?
The lie you keep referring to were CIA talking points, cleared by them and by other intellegence agencies. If there was a lie it wasn't from the Obama admin, it was from the CIA.