sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,597
- 6,144
- 126
and why we neeed new? today is more harder than ever to enlighten buyers to steer away from TN.
They are much improved from the early days. Doesn't make much sense to obsess over this.
and why we neeed new? today is more harder than ever to enlighten buyers to steer away from TN.
And still much, much more improvement required before TN panels can compete on anything but price. The viewing angles are still horrible and still 6 bit panels with dither.They are much improved from the early days. Doesn't make much sense to obsess over this.
And still much, much more improvement required before TN panels can compete on anything but price. The viewing angles are still horrible and still 6 bit panels with dither.
Not obsessive, just basic observation. At least now we have low cost eIPS as options. I'd select the $199.00 2209A over any TN in that price range. And did.
And still much, much more improvement required before TN panels can compete on anything but price. The viewing angles are still horrible and still 6 bit panels with dither.
Not obsessive, just basic observation. At least now we have low cost eIPS as options. I'd select the $199.00 2209A over any TN in that price range. And did.
Asus VE248H
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824236102
or
SAMSUNG BX2431
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824001440
I've seen IPS displays and quite frankly I think TN panels are more suited for the typical PC gamer. The advantages of IPS doesn't really outweigh the input lag and lack of deep blacks I see on many IPS screens. Viewing angle is never an issue for me (because I sit in front of my monitor) and color precision isn't essential since most of us don't do graphic work. I'm not trying to begrudge IPS monitors but just wanted to make clear that these panels are better suited for non-gamers.
The only thing I like about IPS panels is that they come in 16:10 rather than the ubiquitous 16:9 aspect ratios for TN.
Asus VE248H
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824236102
or
SAMSUNG BX2431
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824001440
You accepting the torch?
So, I was going to buy the Asus VH236H for my brother for Christmas, but I waited too long and the sweet deal ($129 after rebate) ended. What do you guys recommend for around $150? I'm hoping to get a 22" or 23" monitor for that price.
See my post just above regarding the Acer.
John
Thanks. I'm debating whether to go for 1680 or go up to 1980. I am leaning towards 1980 X 1080 at a minimum.
The Acer is 16:10, a rarity in a TN panel these days. 1920 x 1080 is a television screen aspect ratio (16:9) and not a computer screen (16:10) aspect ratio. It is unfortunate that the industry chose to go almost exclusively with a television format for computing to save a few bucks.
John
Furthermore, until you see an IPS without the matte finish that hinders even more color, I personally feel again that IPS is superior in every way shape and form and will continue to be.
Newegg had an "Encore Tuesday" deal on the Acer G235HAbd 23" monitor for $140 so I bought it:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824009266
I would've preferred 1920 x 1200 to be honest, but my brother won't really care. In my case, I bought the U2410 because I did care.